A Critique of Michael Heisers Liberal View of Divine Inspiration. @stevecopland6001
A Critique of Michael Heisers Liberal View of Divine Inspiration.  @stevecopland6001
Uploaded September 2025 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
After watching a two part series on the Inspiration of Scripture by Dr. Michael Heiser, I learned that God probably didn’t speak directly to Moses or the prophets, that no prophecy contains future knowledge, that we have no idea who wrote a 3rd of the Bible, that prophets included pagan sources as well as God for their inspiration, and that God never altered the people He chose.

Nowhere did he mention that the prophets had the Holy Spirit upon them, or that the apostles were born again men and partakers of the divine nature. All of this is spiritless, liberal intellectualism which undermines the true inspiration of Scripture.

Part One Link: youtube.com/watch?v=8u1arU3fzIs&t=1s
Part Two Link: youtube.com/watch?v=JXIbGCAxHgU
A Critique of Michael Heisers Liberal View of Divine Inspiration.World Religions and Cults: HinduismThe Parables of Jesus: Worldly Wealth or Treasue in Heaven?Michael Heiser and Troy Martin  on 1st Corinthians 11: Arrogant, Perverted and Unbiblical!Refuting Free-Grace Heresy: Are Apostates Saved?Reclaiming Early Church Practice: Why Start a House Church?World Religions and Cults: Jehovahs Witnesses  #worldreligions #apostateprophetEvolution or Creation:The Birth of the Theory of EvolutionWorld Religions and Cults: Seventh-day AdventistsThe Second Blessing: A Dangerous DoctrineReclaiming Early Church Practice: Changing the ParadigmWorld Religions and Cults: Jehovahs Witnesses
Steve Copland |

A Critique of Michael Heiser's Liberal View of Divine Inspiration.

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER