Uploaded January 2013 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
My previous video, Part 1:
youtube.com/watch?v=ND6cYpke-o8&lc=zJSc-dWkcQBlS6mGqjhdMWNk_Nq0CN0gwPVZNIcPpUM
I know, AGAIN a video about WLCraig... I had to expose another example of his charitable nature in an intellectual sense. Because Richard Dawkins does not deal especially with the 2 premises of the simple Kalam cosmological argument, by WL Craig's logic, he exhibits a "tacit agreement" with Craig's argument... By the same logic, Craig himself shows a tacit agreement with the arguments for naturalism and the meaning of life in atheism, which Jacques Monod has stated, and supported by scientific data in his book "Chance and Necessity". Craig has read the book and quotes from it, yet he does not dispute any of these arguments and agrees with them because he doesn't offer refutations. Same logic as Dawkins' "tacit agreement" with Craig's argument!
Links to videos, used in this video:
youtube.com/watch?v=rWRoJ9myovY
youtube.com/watch?v=6Vn38nVW-Wo
My previous video, Part 1:
youtube.com/watch?v=ND6cYpke-o8&lc=zJSc-dWkcQBlS6mGqjhdMWNk_Nq0CN0gwPVZNIcPpUM
I know, AGAIN a video about WLCraig... I had to expose another example of his charitable nature in an intellectual sense. Because Richard Dawkins does not deal especially with the 2 premises of the simple Kalam cosmological argument, by WL Craig's logic, he exhibits a "tacit agreement" with Craig's argument... By the same logic, Craig himself shows a tacit agreement with the arguments for naturalism and the meaning of life in atheism, which Jacques Monod has stated, and supported by scientific data in his book "Chance and Necessity". Craig has read the book and quotes from it, yet he does not dispute any of these arguments and agrees with them because he doesn't offer refutations. Same logic as Dawkins' "tacit agreement" with Craig's argument!
Links to videos, used in this video:
youtube.com/watch?v=rWRoJ9myovY
youtube.com/watch?v=6Vn38nVW-Wo










