Why epiphenomenalism is almost certainly false @EmersonGreen
Why epiphenomenalism is almost certainly false  @EmersonGreen
Uploaded June 2020 | Updated September 2026, 13 hours ago
Subscribe to the podcast here: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/walden-pod/id1474408172

(I) Plausible Examples of Mental Causation
a. Utterances about phenomenal consciousness
b. The placebo effect
(II) Popper’s Deductive Evolutionary Argument
(III) James’s Abductive Evolutionary Argument

Citations for this episode can be found here: audioboom.com/posts/7606144-24-why-epiphenomenalism-is-almost-certainly-false

emersongreenblog.wordpress.com/2020/06/12/why-epiphenomenalism-is-almost-certainly-false

patreon.com/waldenpod

@waldenpod

https://linktr.ee/emersongreen

/ timestamps /

00:00 Introduction

03:31 a short argument against epiphenomenalism

05:41 misc.

08:00 the placebo effect

11:07 Popper’s Deductive Evolutionary Argument

13:40 James’s Abductive Evolutionary Argument

17:30 why is anyone an epiphenomenalist?

18:57 a better solution

20:53 mental causation =/= free will

22:04 Returning to the Abductive Evolutionary Argument

24:30 the multiverse can't save you

26:23 emergence and epiphenomena
Why epiphenomenalism is almost certainly falseThe Problem of Teleological EvilFree Will: Still RealYou Are A Soul — w/ Ralph Stefan WeirFRIGHTFULLY Bad Skeptical Arguments Against GhostsPost-Debate Interview w/ Justin Schieber of Real AtheologySchopenhauer on Mind & MatterYes, Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary EvidenceThe Participation Theodicy with @johnbuck40084 Things I Learned About EPISTEMOLOGYThe Problem of Other Minds & the Privacy of ConsciousnessWhat is consciousness is a bad question
Emerson Green |

Why epiphenomenalism is almost certainly false

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER