Uploaded April 2025 | Updated September 2026, 3 days ago
Folks, the skeptics are not sending their best. Today, we're discussing three arguments that purport to demonstrate that ghosts are not real. I was unimpressed by these "refutations" and wanted to explain why I think they miss the center of the spectral target. While I don't positively believe in ghosts, I don't think pretending weak arguments are decisive is very productive.
In short, these arguments rely on dubious assumptions about the nature and behavior of ghosts, assumptions which are ultimately little more than speculations on the part of skeptics. In response, I offer a few speculations of my own, which can serve as undercutting defeaters. At best, the skeptic succeeds only in refuting a narrow subset of ghostly hypotheses. While these arguments are interesting and notable, they fall short of being conclusive refutations.
DUALISM PLAYLIST youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgCsHWkb9NYvJN4Yq-qMyOJilAVsdY2b9&si=6IEro1Yf_ZBmeuWJ
Twitter thread where I first encountered Wang Chong https://x.com/echetus/status/1861192727892832762
Wang Chong - IEP https://iep.utm.edu/wangchon/
PHILOSOPHY ON THE FRINGES - Ghosts and Hauntings podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ghosts-and-hauntings/id1670780660?i=1000674793925
Dale Allison Interview - Encountering Mystery youtu.be/YpMiprlCx-o?si=ESsxm9cwNEjWDMMX
Greenbrier Ghost - Jimmy Akin’s Mysterious World youtu.be/Vy6q4FF997M?si=jJvg-yTHwgbad4Qg
Music for this episode was performed by yours truly (except the drums).
Linktree https://linktr.ee/emersongreen
00:00 Intro
01:29 Argument from Physical Shape
05:32 Argument from Population
16:24 Argument from Ghostly Efficacy
21:36 What are ghosts?
Folks, the skeptics are not sending their best. Today, we're discussing three arguments that purport to demonstrate that ghosts are not real. I was unimpressed by these "refutations" and wanted to explain why I think they miss the center of the spectral target. While I don't positively believe in ghosts, I don't think pretending weak arguments are decisive is very productive.
In short, these arguments rely on dubious assumptions about the nature and behavior of ghosts, assumptions which are ultimately little more than speculations on the part of skeptics. In response, I offer a few speculations of my own, which can serve as undercutting defeaters. At best, the skeptic succeeds only in refuting a narrow subset of ghostly hypotheses. While these arguments are interesting and notable, they fall short of being conclusive refutations.
DUALISM PLAYLIST youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgCsHWkb9NYvJN4Yq-qMyOJilAVsdY2b9&si=6IEro1Yf_ZBmeuWJ
Twitter thread where I first encountered Wang Chong https://x.com/echetus/status/1861192727892832762
Wang Chong - IEP https://iep.utm.edu/wangchon/
PHILOSOPHY ON THE FRINGES - Ghosts and Hauntings podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ghosts-and-hauntings/id1670780660?i=1000674793925
Dale Allison Interview - Encountering Mystery youtu.be/YpMiprlCx-o?si=ESsxm9cwNEjWDMMX
Greenbrier Ghost - Jimmy Akin’s Mysterious World youtu.be/Vy6q4FF997M?si=jJvg-yTHwgbad4Qg
Music for this episode was performed by yours truly (except the drums).
Linktree https://linktr.ee/emersongreen
00:00 Intro
01:29 Argument from Physical Shape
05:32 Argument from Population
16:24 Argument from Ghostly Efficacy
21:36 What are ghosts?

![Schopenhauer on Mind & Matter
Arthur Schopenhauer developed a fascinating version of dual-aspect monism, according to which from outside, the world appears as representation, but from inside, it appears as will: ontological monism and epistemological dualism. To Schopenhauer, desire-driven will is what we are from inside, and he goes on to argue that we should think of the underlying reality of all appearance in the same way. You represent my will as a body, but there’s an underlying reality to your representation that’s experiential in character. Schopenhauer thinks the basis of this dual-aspect character of reality pervades the natural world, organic and inorganic. Why? Because this is our only form of insight into—or acquaintance with—anything as a thing in itself.
We also discuss the connection between Nietzsche and Schopenhauer, whether Schopenhauer is an idealist or a panpsychist, and explore a couple arguments for panpsychism.
“[O]n the path of objective knowledge, thus starting from the representation, we shall never get beyond the representation...We shall therefore remain at the outside of things; we shall never be able to penetrate into their inner nature, and investigate what they are in themselves…So far, I agree with Kant. But … we ourselves are the thing-in-itself. Consequently, a way from within stands open to us to that real inner nature of things to which we cannot penetrate from without. It is, so to speak, a subterranean passage, a secret alliance, which, as if by treachery, places us all at once in the fortress that could not be taken by attack from without.”
SHOWNOTES, LINKS, & REFERENCES: https://audioboom.com/posts/7758773-33-schopenhauer-on-mind-matter
Transcript https://emersongreenblog.wordpress.com/2020/12/23/schopenhauer-on-mind-matter/
Follow on Twitter @waldenpod and @OnPanpsychism
Listen to Counter Apologetics here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/counter-apologetics/id1273573417?mt=2
Listen to Walden Pod here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/walden-pod/id1474408172
/ timestamps /
00:00 Schopenhauers personality
02:23 Will and Representation
10:15 Panpsychism and the key to movement
16:46 A subterranean passage
20:27 Different sides of the same mountain Schopenhauer on Mind & Matter](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TG3TRQ94KjE/mqdefault.jpg)








