Uploaded July 2021 | Updated September 2026, 2 days ago
In this second livestream, we will address your questions about session 2, which is focused on Random Mutations.
===
Summary of topic of discussion:
What are Random Mutations? And why are they such a big deal in evolutionary thinking?!
Today we are going to learn about genetics and mutations, and understand what role mutations play in the Theory of Evolution.
Evolution is about the change of features and traits of creatures over time. But the ToE claims that those changes, on the macro level, primarily due to random events can bring about huge variation in shapes of creatures that live today versus their ancient ancestors.
===
Related videos:
This is the original episode to which the Q&A is related to:
youtu.be/WkTR6j19dT0
Extended material video of On Evolution series referenced in the video:
youtu.be/c9j0P4wtHSo
===
References and further materials related to the asked questions:
Q9: The e.coli experiment:
An article about whether evolutionary thinking accepts that mutations can be directed (Berkeley) https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/mutations_07
===
Stream originally aired on Saturday 10th of July, 4pm GMT.
Watch here:
youtu.be/lsRGSsDguWA
What is Random Mutation? | #EvolutionCourse Livestream 2
In this second livestream, we will address your questions about session 2, which is focused on Random Mutations.
===
Summary of topic of discussion:
What are Random Mutations? And why are they such a big deal in evolutionary thinking?!
Today we are going to learn about genetics and mutations, and understand what role mutations play in the Theory of Evolution.
Evolution is about the change of features and traits of creatures over time. But the ToE claims that those changes, on the macro level, primarily due to random events can bring about huge variation in shapes of creatures that live today versus their ancient ancestors.
===
Related videos:
This is the original episode to which the Q&A is related to:
youtu.be/WkTR6j19dT0
Extended material video of On Evolution series referenced in the video:
youtu.be/c9j0P4wtHSo
===
References and further materials related to the asked questions:
Q9: The e.coli experiment:
An article about whether evolutionary thinking accepts that mutations can be directed (Berkeley) https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/mutations_07
===
Stream originally aired on Saturday 10th of July, 4pm GMT.
Watch here:
youtu.be/lsRGSsDguWA
What is Random Mutation? | #EvolutionCourse Livestream 2








![Dr. William Lane Craig, On God & Philosophy, Q&A | Kalam Cosmological Argument
What a conversation with Dr. Craig about Kalam Cosmological Argument! He described it at the end with: I dont think I ever had a more stimulating discussion on the [Kalam Cosmological] argument than this one!
I hope you all enjoy it and benefit from it!
Dr. William Lane Craig is a renowned American Christian Philosopher, known for popularizing the Kalam Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, which was initially formulated by Imam Al-Ghazaly, the renowned Muslim Scholar.
Dr. Craig’s youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/reasonablefaithorg
Dr. Craig’s website: https://www.reasonablefaith.org
@ReasonableFaithOrg
Dr. Craig has been ranked 10th most influential philosopher 1990-2020, and 3rd Theological by: https://academicinfluence.com/people?year-min=1990&discipline=philosophy#search-results
And:
https://academicinfluence.com/people?year-min=1990&discipline=theology
Streamed on August 27th at 4pm ET / 8pm GMT.
What is Kalam Cosmological Argument?
Premise 1: all what begins to exist has a cause, 2: the universe begins to exit,
Therefore, 3: the universe has a cause.
Questions:
Beginnings:
B1. The word beginning means that time is real. Some would claim that time may just be an illusion played by our brains, or invoke the relativistic nature of time . Comments?
B2. Some say that the universes beginning might be eternally old, and they would claim that a past infinity can exist. Comments?
B3. When confronted that actual infinities cannot exist, some would then extrapolate to God, and say that we (believers) say that God is eternally old. Comments?
B4. Is it fair in your opinion to refer to a beginning of the universe before the big bang while we do not have empirical evidence for that?
B5. Some still invoke CCC to get away from beginnings while the BGV theorem makes it clear that there must be an absolute beginning. Your comment?
B6. What is your response to some claims that the direction of time (from past to present to future) might be an illusion due to the huge entropic event of the big bang?
Causality:
C1. I have gone into many discussions where I have been surprised by some people denying that causality is a law of nature. Where would you position causality, in physics, or philosophy or logic?
C2. Some appeal to Quantum events to try to deny causality; virtual particles, radioactive decay, tunneling, quantum foam, ... etc. What would be your response?
C3. When we say that all what begins has a cause, some would go the length that we do not know about everything, so we cannot make such a statement! Is there be a possible world that does not have causality at its foundation?
C4. I have seen some contest causality using Bells Theorem. Is it true that it is against causality? Is there a relation between hidden variables and causality?
C5. Is it possible to refer to some quantum experiments like delayed-choice quantum eraser to conclude that a future version of the universe might have retro-caused itself in the past?
The Universe:
U1. Some say the universe can be caused by quantum fluctuation, then inflation, then they invoke negative energy of gravity as the balancing factor that prevents breaking of conservation. Comments?
U2. Some physicists dare say that quantum mechanics breaks conservation of energy. You talked to top physicists; Is this is a valid statement? Is it possible at all to break conservation?
U3. Is it possible to use virtual particles popping in and out of existence as an excuse for breaking conservation? Is it fair to deal with virtual particles as if they are real?
God:
O1. A cause outside of time is personal or non-personal. Why do you philosophically assert that the cause is personal (God)?
G1. When we say: The universe has a cause, some would say that the conclusion does not have God in it, and that we believers force God into the logic. Why does the cause have to be God?
G2. Some would then argue that using the same logic of KCA, we should invoke a beginning to God, and a cause, hence defeating ourselves. Some have even dared say that maybe infinite regress is possible. What is the shortest answer to that?
G3. Is it possible to deduce Gods attributes from observing the universe, or is religion mandatory in that respect in your opinion?
G4. If we are to extend KCA in the shortest form to explicitly include God, how would it be formulated?
G5. Is it rational to reject God as an explanation to the complexity and tuning of the universe because He has to be more complex?
Religion:
R1. Is it possible to make a philosophical argument for the necessity of religion?
R2. What would in your opinion be a way to determine a true religion using logic / philosophy, if there is any?
For more:
https://findingtruthchannel.com
https://youtube.com/c/findingtruthchannel
https://facebook.com/findingtruthchannel
#WilliamLaneCraig #KalamCosmologicalArgument #Kalam #KCA
Share the link:
https://youtu.be/o_cZd4R4vbY Dr. William Lane Craig, On God & Philosophy, Q&A | Kalam Cosmological Argument](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/o_cZd4R4vbY/mqdefault.jpg)

