Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Community of Madrid Orchestra conducted by José Ramón Encinar. Manuel Miján as the saxophonist.
I - A Night Piece: 0:00
II - The Voice of the Devil: 8:59
III - The Eve of St. Agnes: 15:17
Humet's "Three Nocturnes" was composed between 1999-2001, being the composer's first orchestral piece. In 2005 it received the composition prize from the Villa de Madrid "Joaquín Rodrigo". It was premiered at the National Auditorium of Music in Madrid on October 4 of 2006, performed by the Community of Madrid Orchestra conducted by José Ramón Encinar, with Manuel Miján as the saxophonist. The score is dedicated to Dutch saxophonist Carola Cuypers.
According to the composer, the piece was inspired by the reading of three English poems from the 19th century that evoke the spirit and atmosphere of the night with different nuances and perspectives; The first movement by "A Night Piece" from William Wordsworth, the second by "The Voice of the Devil" from William Blake, and the third by "The Eve of St. Agnes" from John Keats. The piece features a saxophone in a soloistic role, a "voice of the poem, with its warm and sensual timbre, which allegorically evokes the atmospheres and concepts of the texts", according to Humet.
The composer also further states the following about the scoring: "The orchestra is conceived organically, with internal movement at all levels, and with a refined instrumentation that takes into account the sonic spectrum of each instrument. The movement arises from the soloist's own musical phrase, which is reflected like a shadow with a life of its own in the orchestral mass. The overall colour of the orchestration is sweet and tranquil, like the night evoked in the poems. The three movements end with a fusion of sound into silence, which is the deepest music of the soul."
The first movement refers to the following fragment of its respective poem: “[…] and the mind / Not undisturbed by the delight is feels, / Which slowly settles into peaceful calm, / Is left to muse upon the solemn scene”. It begins with glasses with water being bowed, creating a sustained and ethereal sound. Harp and both pizzicato and bowed strings join in, before the soloist enters with sustained notes in the high register. This initial state of statis gives way to the melodic and evocative phrasing of the saxophone. The orchestra supports the soloist with a densely and colourful texture.
Clarinets and bass clarinet share a brief dialogue, before the music reaches an expressive climax in the central part. Another brief transition with clarinet and muted trumpet lead to another contemplative solo for the saxophone over strings. Suddenly the entire orchestra grows agitated in a tumultuous climax. A cadenza-like passage for the saxophonist showcases the virtuosity of the soloist and the possibilities of the instrument. The movement ends with a brief return to the opening statism, before the music dissolves in the silence.
The second movement refers to the following fragment of its respective poem: “[…] 1. Man has no Body distinct from his Soul for that calld Body is a portion of Soul discernd by the five Senses, the chief inlets of Soul in this age. / 2. Energy is the only life and is from the Body and reason is the bound or outward circumference of Energy. / 3. Energy is Eternal Delight”. It opens with a lyrical solo of the saxophone supported by harp and strings. The full orchetra then enters with a dissonant and chaotic response, as if struggling with the soloist. A tumultuous and rhythmic climax is reached, after which the saxophonist begins another solo over strings. After an intense orchestral climax, the soloist engages in another lyrical solo, with occasional orchestral outbursts. As with the first movement, the music enigmatically fragments into the silence.
The third movement refers to the following fragment of its respective poem: “[…] hey told her how, upon St. Agnes’Eve, / Young virgins might have visions of delight. / And soft adorings from their loves receive / Upon the honey’d middle of the night, If ceremonies due they did aright; / As supperless to bed they must retire, And couch supine their beauties, lilly white; Nor look behind, nor sideways, but require / Of heaven with upward eyes for all they desire […]”. After a brief introduction with extended techniques, the soloist begins a sensuous solo over sustained strings. A more rhythmic passage introduces contrast, before the saxophone continues. After a brief pause, a richly scored orchestral texture creates a rarefied landscape. The soloist returns with a final lyrical solo, only accompanied by the harp near the end, before the music once again dissolves in the silence.
Picture: "The Mysteries of the Horizon" (1955) by the Belgian painter René Magritte.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/26fqrb2k and tinyurl.com/23rr5373
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.
Community of Madrid Orchestra conducted by José Ramón Encinar. Manuel Miján as the saxophonist.
I - A Night Piece: 0:00
II - The Voice of the Devil: 8:59
III - The Eve of St. Agnes: 15:17
Humet's "Three Nocturnes" was composed between 1999-2001, being the composer's first orchestral piece. In 2005 it received the composition prize from the Villa de Madrid "Joaquín Rodrigo". It was premiered at the National Auditorium of Music in Madrid on October 4 of 2006, performed by the Community of Madrid Orchestra conducted by José Ramón Encinar, with Manuel Miján as the saxophonist. The score is dedicated to Dutch saxophonist Carola Cuypers.
According to the composer, the piece was inspired by the reading of three English poems from the 19th century that evoke the spirit and atmosphere of the night with different nuances and perspectives; The first movement by "A Night Piece" from William Wordsworth, the second by "The Voice of the Devil" from William Blake, and the third by "The Eve of St. Agnes" from John Keats. The piece features a saxophone in a soloistic role, a "voice of the poem, with its warm and sensual timbre, which allegorically evokes the atmospheres and concepts of the texts", according to Humet.
The composer also further states the following about the scoring: "The orchestra is conceived organically, with internal movement at all levels, and with a refined instrumentation that takes into account the sonic spectrum of each instrument. The movement arises from the soloist's own musical phrase, which is reflected like a shadow with a life of its own in the orchestral mass. The overall colour of the orchestration is sweet and tranquil, like the night evoked in the poems. The three movements end with a fusion of sound into silence, which is the deepest music of the soul."
The first movement refers to the following fragment of its respective poem: “[…] and the mind / Not undisturbed by the delight is feels, / Which slowly settles into peaceful calm, / Is left to muse upon the solemn scene”. It begins with glasses with water being bowed, creating a sustained and ethereal sound. Harp and both pizzicato and bowed strings join in, before the soloist enters with sustained notes in the high register. This initial state of statis gives way to the melodic and evocative phrasing of the saxophone. The orchestra supports the soloist with a densely and colourful texture.
Clarinets and bass clarinet share a brief dialogue, before the music reaches an expressive climax in the central part. Another brief transition with clarinet and muted trumpet lead to another contemplative solo for the saxophone over strings. Suddenly the entire orchestra grows agitated in a tumultuous climax. A cadenza-like passage for the saxophonist showcases the virtuosity of the soloist and the possibilities of the instrument. The movement ends with a brief return to the opening statism, before the music dissolves in the silence.
The second movement refers to the following fragment of its respective poem: “[…] 1. Man has no Body distinct from his Soul for that calld Body is a portion of Soul discernd by the five Senses, the chief inlets of Soul in this age. / 2. Energy is the only life and is from the Body and reason is the bound or outward circumference of Energy. / 3. Energy is Eternal Delight”. It opens with a lyrical solo of the saxophone supported by harp and strings. The full orchetra then enters with a dissonant and chaotic response, as if struggling with the soloist. A tumultuous and rhythmic climax is reached, after which the saxophonist begins another solo over strings. After an intense orchestral climax, the soloist engages in another lyrical solo, with occasional orchestral outbursts. As with the first movement, the music enigmatically fragments into the silence.
The third movement refers to the following fragment of its respective poem: “[…] hey told her how, upon St. Agnes’Eve, / Young virgins might have visions of delight. / And soft adorings from their loves receive / Upon the honey’d middle of the night, If ceremonies due they did aright; / As supperless to bed they must retire, And couch supine their beauties, lilly white; Nor look behind, nor sideways, but require / Of heaven with upward eyes for all they desire […]”. After a brief introduction with extended techniques, the soloist begins a sensuous solo over sustained strings. A more rhythmic passage introduces contrast, before the saxophone continues. After a brief pause, a richly scored orchestral texture creates a rarefied landscape. The soloist returns with a final lyrical solo, only accompanied by the harp near the end, before the music once again dissolves in the silence.
Picture: "The Mysteries of the Horizon" (1955) by the Belgian painter René Magritte.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/26fqrb2k and tinyurl.com/23rr5373
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.

![Symphony No.5 in B-flat major - Sergei Prokofiev
Scottish National Orchestra conducted by Neeme Järvi.
I - Andante (𝅘𝅥 = 48) - Poco più mosso - Tempo I - Un poco animando - Poco più mosso - Tempo I - Meno mosso: 0:00
II - Allegro marcato (𝅘𝅥 = 132) - Pochissimo più animato - Meno mosso - Più mosso (un poco pìu animato chel tempo I) - Meno mosso - Allegro marcato, come prima: 12:26
III - Adagio (𝅘𝅥 = 60) - Poco più animato - Più lento: 21:02
IV - Allegro giocoso (𝅗𝅥 = 72) - Poco più tranquillo - Tempo I: 33:00
Prokofievs Symphony No.5 was conceived on 1943 during the composers stay in Alma-Ata (the largest city in Kazakhstan), relocated alongside other composers like Myaskovsky, Shostakovich or Khachaturian. He composed the work during his stay in summer of 1944 at the Composers House in Ivanovo, while the war was still raging but the tide had turned in the Allies favor. It was premiered at the Moscow Conservatory on January 13 of 1945, performed by the USSR State Symphony Orchestra conducted by the composer. There is a well-known story that during the first performance with the composer conducting, celebratory artillery salutes could be heard marking the Red Army’s invasion of Germany.
The symphony became a great success, being awarded a Stalin prize on 1946. Soon it was performed in the United States and in the freed Europe. To this day, it remains one of Prokofievs most popular works. Prokofiev himself described the piece as: a hymn to free and happy Man, to his mighty powers, his pure and noble spirit. I cannot say that I deliberately chose this theme. It was born in me and clamoured for expression. The music matured within me. It filled my soul. In later interviews, the composer revealed that most of the material actually originated from previous years, going as far back as 1933. Although the symphony lacks a programme per se, it is undeniably a depiction of war and victory.
Unfortunately for Prokofiev, the success was short-lived, as son after the composer fell and injured his head, restricting subsequent activities. Although he continued to compose, it was the last time he would conduct an orchestral premiere of his own music. More chillingly, the patriotic fervour of the war did not last, and governmental control returned with an iron fist. In 1948, Prokofievs music was severely condemned by the Soviet Composer’s Union and a number of his compositions were specifically banned, making him a persona non grata in the Moscow concert hall. In a final stroke of unkind fate, the long-suffering composer died on the same day in 1953 as Stalin. Unlike his colleagues with whom he had spent the summer of 1944 in retreat, he would never experience the loosening of artistic restrictions that followed the dictator’s death.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a broad and lyrical main theme in B-flat major, introduced by flute and bassoon before passing onto full orchestra as it rises in an epic and solemn way. After a more agitated transition, a melodic and expressive second theme is presented by flute and oboe over strings, culminating in a grand climax. This exposition ends with a rhythmic figure that plays a key role in the ensuing development, which starts with the main theme on low strings. The music becomes more frantic and dramatic as the material is transformed, reaching an intense and passionate climax. It directly leads into the varied recapitulation of the themes. The substantial coda is a slower and heavier version of the main theme, closing the andante with tremendous force after a brief lyrical interruption.
The second movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It opens with a rhythmic and lively main theme in D minor, presented in the form of a bellicose toccata full of syncopated rhythms. A more melodic passage offers contrast before returning to the opening driving and motoric textures. The central trio section is largely derived from material of Prokofievs ballet Cinderella (also premiered on 1945). It features a playful and dance-like second theme in D major, shared between strings and woodwinds. The music reaches an unbridled and dionysiac climax, a sharp contrast from the previous tension. The scherzo then continues with a slow march that gradually accelerates, with the main theme returning with an increasing sense of menace. The allegro marcato then ends after a dissonant crescendo.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: Photograph of the Soviet War Memorial in Treptower Park (1946-9), Germany.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/273j27ja and https://tinyurl.com/24njfw6w
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2agn87t6 Symphony No.5 in B-flat major - Sergei Prokofiev](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JXGuNbF-kvg/mqdefault.jpg)


![Symphony in Three Movements - Igor Stravinsky
Royal Scottish National Orchestra conducted by Sir Alexander Gibson. Raymon OConnell as the pianist.
I - (𝅘𝅥 = 80-160) - (𝅘𝅥 = 80) - (𝅘𝅥 = 160) - (𝅘𝅥 = 80) - (𝅗𝅥 = 80): 0:00
II - Andante (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 76) - Più mosso (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 92) - Tempo I (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 76) - Interlude. Listesso tempo - (attacca): 9:49
III - Con moto (𝅘𝅥 = 108) - Più presto (𝅘𝅥 = 144) - Meno mosso (Con moto 𝅘𝅥 = 108) - Listesso tempo, tranquillo - Alla breve (𝅗𝅥 = 80): 16:00
Stravinskys Symphony in Three Movements was composed between June 1942 and August 1945, a few months after the end of World War II. It was commissioned for the New York Philharmonic Orchestra, to whom the work is dedicated. The work was initially conceived as an overture, not being described as a Symphony until relatively late. Stravinsky later thought it would be better renamed as Three Symphonic Movements or even Concerto for Orchestra. It was premiered at Carnegie Hall on January 24 of 1946, performed by the New York Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by the composer. It was first recorded four days later with the same orchestra, and in 1972 it was adapted as a ballet by Balanchine.
Stravinsky was a firm advocate for absolute music, he famously claimed that music in itself was incapable of expressing anything. However, in his symphony he admitted the inspiration of documentaries about the then-ongoing World War II, going as far as calling the work his war symphony. The first movement was apparently inspired war films documenting scorched-earth tactics by the Japanese army in China, while the third was influenced by war footage of German goose-stepping soldiers and the news of the recent allied victories. On other occasions, the composer denied any direct extra-musical inspiration or the existence of a program. Stravinsky was also inspired by his previous works, as he revisited The Rite of Spring in an (incomplete) attempt to rescore it. The influence of the rites dissonance and harshness is most notable in the outer movements.
When the U.S. entered World War II in December 1941, Hollywood went to war as well, and film producer Louis B. Mayer soon commissioned Stravinsky to compose works for the wartime news footage his studio was churning out. Stravinsky was also invited by his Hollywood neighbour, author Franz Werfel, to write music for a film based on Werfel’s book The Song of Bernadette. Although all of these projects were eventually scrapped (Werfel’s movie was released with Alfred Newman’s more conventional music), Stravinsky decided to use the themes he had developed for these projects into the piece. He adapted his war music for the outer movements, while the central movement was based on a theme he had written for the appearance of the Virgin Mary in The Song of Bernadette.
The first movement is loosely structured in sonata form. It opens with a fiercely dissonant and violent introduction in F minor. The main theme (in the same key) is also menacing in tone, introduced in piano by woodwinds. Bitonality is widely used throughout the work, with part of the main theme revolving around A minor against E-flat major. The second theme, in G minor, is nearly as ruthlessly violent as the opening. The influence of The Rite of Spring on the basic material is clearly audible. A more solemn and expansive third theme is also bitonal in nature (G major and D-flat major). This exposition ends with a ferocious E minor cadence.
The development opens with fragments of the introductory and thematic material, largely bitonal as well but with brief moments anchored in B minor, D major and F major (this one coinciding with a reference to The Firebird). A series of fiercely dissonant chords seem to reference the climax of the first movement of Beethovens Eroica. This development is interrupted by a rarefied pastoral episode in G major, then modulating to F major and D major. After an A minor transition, the main themes are recapitulated. The return of the introduction material in C minor signals the beginning of the coda, then restated in the original F minor. The movement then ends with a rather ambiguous C major chord.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: Photograph of a crash landing of a U.S. Navy Grumman F6F-3 Hellcat (Number 30) of Fighting Squadron 2 (VF-2) aboard the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CV-6), into the carriers port side 20mm gun gallery, 10 November 1943.
Sources: https://tinyurl.com/yn2alvlc, https://tinyurl.com/yve23lju and https://tinyurl.com/ysyw8vb9
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/2dq72qhs Symphony in Three Movements - Igor Stravinsky](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/JhJDtdrIxeE/mqdefault.jpg)


![Symphony No.8 Hommage à Teilhard De Chardin - Edmund Rubbra
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Moderato: 0:00
II - Allegretto con brio: 8:49
III - Poco lento: 15:21
Rubbras Symphony No.8 was composed between 1966-8, completed after over a ten-year gap. To the composers dismay, by the late 1960s Rubbras music was out of fashion, and his new music attracted little attention. It wasnt premiered until January 5 of 1971, performed by the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Sir Charles Groves. As in the Seventh Symphony, the work is in three movements, with a slow finale. This time, however, the mood of the movement is optimistic rather than elegiac, a work of immense striving and profound spiritual strength. As the subtitle indicates, the work is a hommage to French polymath Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.
Rubbras symphonies differ from the prevailing model of the symphony in that they are built on a principle of continuous, organic development from a single basic idea. By contrast, the traditional symphony is built on dramatic lines, with contrasting movements, each of which usually has contrasting themes as its main character. The symphony arose during a time which rebelled against counterpoint, while Rubbras intention was to use the example of the great contrapuntal music of the English madrigalists for his model, capturing something of the modal feeling of English folk and church music by the false relationships between parts. Thus, Rubbras symphonies form themselves according to the logic of their main idea, rather than fitting into the standard symphonic shape.
De Chardin was a Jesuit priest, geologist, palaeontologist and philosopher. His studies in these areas gradually led him to a reappraisal of evolutionary theory in the light of Christian thought. He saw matter and spirit as co-evolving towards Christ as the omega point. The dichotomy between science and religion is therefore a false one. It is an optimistic view of the long-term future of mankind but, as Rubbra himself wrote, it was not part of my intention, even if possible, to translate these ideas into music: but they meet, I hope, in a like optimism.’ In many ways, the Symphony portrays a pilgrimage, also hinted at in the choral suite Inscape (1965) and the extraordinary final song of The Jade Mountain cycle of 1962.
The first movement begins with a chord on strings from whose intervals the entire symphony is derived upon, unlike previous ones by Rubbra that were built on a single motive. A mysterious and ethereal theme is introduced and gradually unfolded and developed. As said before, the music is not built on a pair of contrasting themes developed dramatically, but on the organic and continuous growth of the initial ideas. The tension provided between the perfect fourth and third intervals guide most of the moderato. The movement culminates in a solemn and expressive climax, subsiding in an enigmatic coda in which only at the very end the perfect third interval prevails.
The second movement opens with a rhythmic main theme presented between strings and woods, built on the aforementioned perfect third from the symphonys opening chord. More melodic and bucolic passages offer some contrast, but thematically they all come from the same source. As in the first movement, the material is nearly continuously developed and transformed, with prominent roles given to celesta, harp and xylophone. A contemplative woodwind section offers respite, before a crescendo concludes the allegretto with a radiant and triumphal coda.
The third movement begins with an enigmatic opening that introduces the three predominant intervals of the poco lento; seconds, third and sixths. A three-note motive also plays a prominent role. As in the first movement, these elements derived from the opening chords, guide the entire movement to a near continuous linear ascent towards an intense and expressive climax. A long and calm diminuendo ensues with solos of the cello and flute. The symphony ends with a peaceful G major chord with overlapping fourths on the celesta, looking back at the very opening of the piece and bringing it to a luminous close.
Pictures: [Left] Pere Pierre Teilhard de Chardin SJ in the Omega Nebula 349 by William Hart McNichols. [Right] Three-colour composite image of the Omega Nebula (Messier 17, or NGC 6618), based on images obtained with the EMMI instrument on the ESO 3.58-metre New Technology Telescope at the La Silla Observatory.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/22l3mrhr and https://tinyurl.com/2ytropyc
Unfortunately, the score isnt freely available. Symphony No.8 Hommage à Teilhard De Chardin - Edmund Rubbra](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KJmVMI012ys/mqdefault.jpg)


