Uploaded April 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Eastman Rochester Symphony Orchestra conducted by Howard Hanson.
I - Incantation. Allegretto (𝅘𝅥 = 100) - Senza misura (𝅘𝅥 = about 112): 0:00
II - Canzona. Andante espressivo (𝅘𝅥 = 100-8): 5:15
III - Estampie. Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 152) - Senza misura, cadenza - Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 138) : 8:47
IV - Bar (Dance). Allegro vivace (𝅘𝅥. = 92): 12:08
V - Sharagan (Hymn). Lento molto espressivo (𝅘𝅥 = 104) - Andante con moto (𝅘𝅥 = 120) - Andante maestoso (𝅘𝅥 = 104): 13:38
VI - Ballata. Andante (𝅗𝅥 = 84) - (𝅗𝅥 = 72): 18:36
Hovhaness's Concerto for Orchestra No.1 "Arevakal" (Season of the Sun) was composed in 1951, written for the Little Orchestra Society, which premiered the work in New York on February 18 of 1952, conducted by Thomas Scherman. The composition was finished in the same year he moved to New York City and became a full-time composer, as well as he began working for Voice of America, first as a scriptwriter for the Armenian section, then as director of music, composer and musical consultant for the Near East and Transcaucasian sections.
Arevakal is the name by which the Lenten season is designated in the Armenian Church and means literally, "the coming of the sun". The concerto is dedicated to the turn-of-the-century spiritualist Andrew Jackson Davis, Seer of Poughkeepsie. Although the Arevakal Concerto is meant to be listened to on its own terms as music, it is also quite plain that its six movements are intended to evoke some element of mystic ritual.
The first movement is monothematic in form. It begins with a melodic main theme on horn, supported by violas and cellos. It unfolds in a slow and contemplative way, reminiscent of a ritual chant. A solemn, contrapuntal passage for strings ensues as kind of a development of the material. Oboe performs a lyrical solo, followed by the clarinet in a more oriental manner. The allegretto then suddenly ends without a former coda.
The short second movement is also monothematic. It opens with a hymn-like main theme on full strings, with solo trumpet soon joining in a solemn manner. The andante espressivo then concludes with a kind of epilogue, curiously scored for trumpet and two horns, which contrapuntally develop the material until the movement draws to a close with no coda.
The third movement is structured in ternary form, its title referring to the medieval dance form popular in the XIII and XIV centuries. It begins with an animated and rhythmic main theme introduced by oboe, soon in a polytonal canonic counterpoint with clarinet and timpani. Hovhaness extensively employs these canonic and polytonal techniques in the third and fourth movements of the suite. The central section features a lyrical second theme presented by solo flute over a polytonal ostinato figure on harp. The Estampie is then vigorously recapitulated on full orchestra before the dance ends.
The fourth movement is structured in the medieval German verse pattern (A-A-B, two Stollen followed by the Abgesang), taking its name from the Armenian dance of Eastern Anatolia. It opens with a lively and cheerful rhythmic theme presented by first violins, harp (in a different key) and snare drum, also creating a polytonal-canonic texture that intensifies as the rest of strings join in, followed by woodwinds. The dance then suddenly ends.
The fifth movement is written in ternary form, called Sharagan or hymn of praise. It begins with a slow and solemn main theme on trumpet sustained by oboes, clarinets and timpani. The central section is a kind of development of the material, with canonic contrapuntal dialogues between woodwinds. It also contains a number of the Landino cadences, which sound so strange to modern ears. The hymn theme is then recapitulated, leading to a solemn climax on full orchestra with which the Sharagan ends.
The sixth movement is structured in an expanded ternary form (A-B-B-A-A), titled "Ballata", apparently with reference to the 14th century Italian verse structure cultivated by Francesco Landino. It opens with a solemn and contemplative main theme on horn, supported by harp chords, viola and cello pedal notes and pizzicato basses. Clarinets then introduce a second theme and engage in canonic counterpoint exchanges, joined by bassoons, strings. The music culminates in a broad and expansive climax. A recapitulation of the main material is carried by trumpet and strings. The work then ends with a solemn climax.
Picture: Edited version of "From the Aragats' slopes" (1951) by the Armenian painter Martiros Sarian.
Musical analyis partially written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/29thf4w9
To check the score: tinyurl.com/22tvj4eg
Eastman Rochester Symphony Orchestra conducted by Howard Hanson.
I - Incantation. Allegretto (𝅘𝅥 = 100) - Senza misura (𝅘𝅥 = about 112): 0:00
II - Canzona. Andante espressivo (𝅘𝅥 = 100-8): 5:15
III - Estampie. Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 152) - Senza misura, cadenza - Allegro (𝅘𝅥 = 138) : 8:47
IV - Bar (Dance). Allegro vivace (𝅘𝅥. = 92): 12:08
V - Sharagan (Hymn). Lento molto espressivo (𝅘𝅥 = 104) - Andante con moto (𝅘𝅥 = 120) - Andante maestoso (𝅘𝅥 = 104): 13:38
VI - Ballata. Andante (𝅗𝅥 = 84) - (𝅗𝅥 = 72): 18:36
Hovhaness's Concerto for Orchestra No.1 "Arevakal" (Season of the Sun) was composed in 1951, written for the Little Orchestra Society, which premiered the work in New York on February 18 of 1952, conducted by Thomas Scherman. The composition was finished in the same year he moved to New York City and became a full-time composer, as well as he began working for Voice of America, first as a scriptwriter for the Armenian section, then as director of music, composer and musical consultant for the Near East and Transcaucasian sections.
Arevakal is the name by which the Lenten season is designated in the Armenian Church and means literally, "the coming of the sun". The concerto is dedicated to the turn-of-the-century spiritualist Andrew Jackson Davis, Seer of Poughkeepsie. Although the Arevakal Concerto is meant to be listened to on its own terms as music, it is also quite plain that its six movements are intended to evoke some element of mystic ritual.
The first movement is monothematic in form. It begins with a melodic main theme on horn, supported by violas and cellos. It unfolds in a slow and contemplative way, reminiscent of a ritual chant. A solemn, contrapuntal passage for strings ensues as kind of a development of the material. Oboe performs a lyrical solo, followed by the clarinet in a more oriental manner. The allegretto then suddenly ends without a former coda.
The short second movement is also monothematic. It opens with a hymn-like main theme on full strings, with solo trumpet soon joining in a solemn manner. The andante espressivo then concludes with a kind of epilogue, curiously scored for trumpet and two horns, which contrapuntally develop the material until the movement draws to a close with no coda.
The third movement is structured in ternary form, its title referring to the medieval dance form popular in the XIII and XIV centuries. It begins with an animated and rhythmic main theme introduced by oboe, soon in a polytonal canonic counterpoint with clarinet and timpani. Hovhaness extensively employs these canonic and polytonal techniques in the third and fourth movements of the suite. The central section features a lyrical second theme presented by solo flute over a polytonal ostinato figure on harp. The Estampie is then vigorously recapitulated on full orchestra before the dance ends.
The fourth movement is structured in the medieval German verse pattern (A-A-B, two Stollen followed by the Abgesang), taking its name from the Armenian dance of Eastern Anatolia. It opens with a lively and cheerful rhythmic theme presented by first violins, harp (in a different key) and snare drum, also creating a polytonal-canonic texture that intensifies as the rest of strings join in, followed by woodwinds. The dance then suddenly ends.
The fifth movement is written in ternary form, called Sharagan or hymn of praise. It begins with a slow and solemn main theme on trumpet sustained by oboes, clarinets and timpani. The central section is a kind of development of the material, with canonic contrapuntal dialogues between woodwinds. It also contains a number of the Landino cadences, which sound so strange to modern ears. The hymn theme is then recapitulated, leading to a solemn climax on full orchestra with which the Sharagan ends.
The sixth movement is structured in an expanded ternary form (A-B-B-A-A), titled "Ballata", apparently with reference to the 14th century Italian verse structure cultivated by Francesco Landino. It opens with a solemn and contemplative main theme on horn, supported by harp chords, viola and cello pedal notes and pizzicato basses. Clarinets then introduce a second theme and engage in canonic counterpoint exchanges, joined by bassoons, strings. The music culminates in a broad and expansive climax. A recapitulation of the main material is carried by trumpet and strings. The work then ends with a solemn climax.
Picture: Edited version of "From the Aragats' slopes" (1951) by the Armenian painter Martiros Sarian.
Musical analyis partially written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/29thf4w9
To check the score: tinyurl.com/22tvj4eg

![Symphony No.8 Hommage à Teilhard De Chardin - Edmund Rubbra
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Moderato: 0:00
II - Allegretto con brio: 8:49
III - Poco lento: 15:21
Rubbras Symphony No.8 was composed between 1966-8, completed after over a ten-year gap. To the composers dismay, by the late 1960s Rubbras music was out of fashion, and his new music attracted little attention. It wasnt premiered until January 5 of 1971, performed by the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Sir Charles Groves. As in the Seventh Symphony, the work is in three movements, with a slow finale. This time, however, the mood of the movement is optimistic rather than elegiac, a work of immense striving and profound spiritual strength. As the subtitle indicates, the work is a hommage to French polymath Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.
Rubbras symphonies differ from the prevailing model of the symphony in that they are built on a principle of continuous, organic development from a single basic idea. By contrast, the traditional symphony is built on dramatic lines, with contrasting movements, each of which usually has contrasting themes as its main character. The symphony arose during a time which rebelled against counterpoint, while Rubbras intention was to use the example of the great contrapuntal music of the English madrigalists for his model, capturing something of the modal feeling of English folk and church music by the false relationships between parts. Thus, Rubbras symphonies form themselves according to the logic of their main idea, rather than fitting into the standard symphonic shape.
De Chardin was a Jesuit priest, geologist, palaeontologist and philosopher. His studies in these areas gradually led him to a reappraisal of evolutionary theory in the light of Christian thought. He saw matter and spirit as co-evolving towards Christ as the omega point. The dichotomy between science and religion is therefore a false one. It is an optimistic view of the long-term future of mankind but, as Rubbra himself wrote, it was not part of my intention, even if possible, to translate these ideas into music: but they meet, I hope, in a like optimism.’ In many ways, the Symphony portrays a pilgrimage, also hinted at in the choral suite Inscape (1965) and the extraordinary final song of The Jade Mountain cycle of 1962.
The first movement begins with a chord on strings from whose intervals the entire symphony is derived upon, unlike previous ones by Rubbra that were built on a single motive. A mysterious and ethereal theme is introduced and gradually unfolded and developed. As said before, the music is not built on a pair of contrasting themes developed dramatically, but on the organic and continuous growth of the initial ideas. The tension provided between the perfect fourth and third intervals guide most of the moderato. The movement culminates in a solemn and expressive climax, subsiding in an enigmatic coda in which only at the very end the perfect third interval prevails.
The second movement opens with a rhythmic main theme presented between strings and woods, built on the aforementioned perfect third from the symphonys opening chord. More melodic and bucolic passages offer some contrast, but thematically they all come from the same source. As in the first movement, the material is nearly continuously developed and transformed, with prominent roles given to celesta, harp and xylophone. A contemplative woodwind section offers respite, before a crescendo concludes the allegretto with a radiant and triumphal coda.
The third movement begins with an enigmatic opening that introduces the three predominant intervals of the poco lento; seconds, third and sixths. A three-note motive also plays a prominent role. As in the first movement, these elements derived from the opening chords, guide the entire movement to a near continuous linear ascent towards an intense and expressive climax. A long and calm diminuendo ensues with solos of the cello and flute. The symphony ends with a peaceful G major chord with overlapping fourths on the celesta, looking back at the very opening of the piece and bringing it to a luminous close.
Pictures: [Left] Pere Pierre Teilhard de Chardin SJ in the Omega Nebula 349 by William Hart McNichols. [Right] Three-colour composite image of the Omega Nebula (Messier 17, or NGC 6618), based on images obtained with the EMMI instrument on the ESO 3.58-metre New Technology Telescope at the La Silla Observatory.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/22l3mrhr and https://tinyurl.com/2ytropyc
Unfortunately, the score isnt freely available. Symphony No.8 Hommage à Teilhard De Chardin - Edmund Rubbra](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KJmVMI012ys/mqdefault.jpg)








