Uploaded November 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Lento e liberamente (0:00) - Scherzando ma grazioso (4:44) - Lento (8:33) - Molto adagio (14:02)
Rubbra's Symphony No.10 was composed on 1974, being commissioned by the Arts Council for the Northern Sinfonia Orchestra. Scored for a reduced chamber orchestra (one flute, two oboes one of which doubles English horn, two clarinets, two bassoons, two horns and strings), it was premiered by said orchestra on January 8 of 1975, conducted by Rudolf Schwarz. The symphony is dedicated to fellow composer Sir Arthur Bliss, which is rather surprising considering Bliss never appreciated Rubbra's music, going so far as to compare his symphonies to stale pork pies.
Saxton sees affinities with the Sibelius seventh. Both works play extensively with scalar motives and are written in one movement in multiple sections. However, Rubbra's practice of constant transformation and little, if any, traditional development or reliance on classical forms takes this symphony out of Sibelian territory, as does the emphasis on intricate counterpoint. Rubbra uses is primary method of building a symphony, which is to state a germ motive and let the symphony grow organically, as a whole, in a texture of constantly developing polyphony. Overall, the symphony is one of the best examples of the success of the method of letting the symphony find its form and expression through growth rather than the traditional Romantic idea of struggle among contrasting themes.
The piece is loosely structured in sonata form, with each section being separated by a brief pause. It begins with a lento exposition whose opening is given to solo cello, which introduces an interval built around the notes B, F-sharp and A, which is the basis of the whole work. Over this interval, two themes are constructed and unfolded through passages in scale-wise motion, building a complex and powerful polyphonic texture. This leads to a climax culminating on the note B in octaves on the horn, before the same process continues but focusing on F-sharp and A. The music continues to build, almost to an unbearable pitch, until it breaks off and, after a brief silence, the next section begins.
Follows a scherzando development of the material, offering an immediate contrast to the preceding climax. The music takes us into the world of the dance as celebration, a feature of earlier English music and an aspect of musical expression dear to Holst and Tippett. However, the hold of the initial material is still there, for the oboe solo moves downwards from F-sharp to B, thus reversing the direction of the symphony's opening statement. This rhythmically inventive development eventually leads into the third section, a kind of a recapitulation with a return to the initial slow tempo and a wonderfully evocative English horn solo. As always with Rubbra, this is entirely derived from the symphony’s fundamental material.
As the slow music is pervaded by the character of the dance's counterpoint, with poignant violin and viola solo passages, an ecstatic climax is reached. The final section is a substantial and ruminative coda that is a kind of reflection on the whole symphony. It stresses the prevailing diminished fifth interval, but, in moving from the tonal centre of B to that of A, underlines the importance of this shift throughout the symphony before it comes to rest on a luminous A major chord.
Picture: "Landscape Beach" (1975) by British painter Donald Hamilton Fraser.
Sources: tinyurl.com/2bdpskmw and tinyurl.com/2de4n8m3
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.
BBC National Orchestra of Wales conducted by Richard Hickox.
I - Lento e liberamente (0:00) - Scherzando ma grazioso (4:44) - Lento (8:33) - Molto adagio (14:02)
Rubbra's Symphony No.10 was composed on 1974, being commissioned by the Arts Council for the Northern Sinfonia Orchestra. Scored for a reduced chamber orchestra (one flute, two oboes one of which doubles English horn, two clarinets, two bassoons, two horns and strings), it was premiered by said orchestra on January 8 of 1975, conducted by Rudolf Schwarz. The symphony is dedicated to fellow composer Sir Arthur Bliss, which is rather surprising considering Bliss never appreciated Rubbra's music, going so far as to compare his symphonies to stale pork pies.
Saxton sees affinities with the Sibelius seventh. Both works play extensively with scalar motives and are written in one movement in multiple sections. However, Rubbra's practice of constant transformation and little, if any, traditional development or reliance on classical forms takes this symphony out of Sibelian territory, as does the emphasis on intricate counterpoint. Rubbra uses is primary method of building a symphony, which is to state a germ motive and let the symphony grow organically, as a whole, in a texture of constantly developing polyphony. Overall, the symphony is one of the best examples of the success of the method of letting the symphony find its form and expression through growth rather than the traditional Romantic idea of struggle among contrasting themes.
The piece is loosely structured in sonata form, with each section being separated by a brief pause. It begins with a lento exposition whose opening is given to solo cello, which introduces an interval built around the notes B, F-sharp and A, which is the basis of the whole work. Over this interval, two themes are constructed and unfolded through passages in scale-wise motion, building a complex and powerful polyphonic texture. This leads to a climax culminating on the note B in octaves on the horn, before the same process continues but focusing on F-sharp and A. The music continues to build, almost to an unbearable pitch, until it breaks off and, after a brief silence, the next section begins.
Follows a scherzando development of the material, offering an immediate contrast to the preceding climax. The music takes us into the world of the dance as celebration, a feature of earlier English music and an aspect of musical expression dear to Holst and Tippett. However, the hold of the initial material is still there, for the oboe solo moves downwards from F-sharp to B, thus reversing the direction of the symphony's opening statement. This rhythmically inventive development eventually leads into the third section, a kind of a recapitulation with a return to the initial slow tempo and a wonderfully evocative English horn solo. As always with Rubbra, this is entirely derived from the symphony’s fundamental material.
As the slow music is pervaded by the character of the dance's counterpoint, with poignant violin and viola solo passages, an ecstatic climax is reached. The final section is a substantial and ruminative coda that is a kind of reflection on the whole symphony. It stresses the prevailing diminished fifth interval, but, in moving from the tonal centre of B to that of A, underlines the importance of this shift throughout the symphony before it comes to rest on a luminous A major chord.
Picture: "Landscape Beach" (1975) by British painter Donald Hamilton Fraser.
Sources: tinyurl.com/2bdpskmw and tinyurl.com/2de4n8m3
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.






![Symphony No.1 in G minor - Friedrich Gernsheim
Mainz Philharmonic State Orchestra conducted by Hermann Bäumer.
I - Allegro moderato (𝅗𝅥 = 69) - A tempo ma un poco più sostenuto - Animato - Tempo I - Vivo ed appassionato - Tempo I - A tempo ma un poco più sostenuto - Animato - Molto tranquillo: 0:00
II - Larghetto (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 72) - Andante (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Tempo I - Andante - Tempo I: 15:24
III - Scherzo. Vivace (𝅗𝅥. = 100) - Trio. Meno mosso. Marschmässig (𝅘𝅥. = 63) - Da capo scherzo - Coda. Più mosso: 25:09
IV - Finale. Allegro moderato assai (𝅗𝅥 = 66) - Con fuoco ed animato - Tranquillo - Con fuoco - Sehr breit und ruhig, wie zu anfang - Con fuoco ed animato - Tranquillo - Animato - Molto allegro e sempre stringendo al fine: 32:51
Gernsheims Symphony No.1 was composed on 1874, being premiered in Rotterdam on February 25 of 1875, during the composer’s tenure there as Music Director of the city’s Philharmonic Society. The piece was a great success, and it was soon played in Cologne, Leipzig, and Munich, among other places. The symphony is actually not Gernsheim’s first; an earlier effort in E-flat major was composed in 1857 during his stay in Paris, but this work remains unknown to this day. The piece was very well received, Max Bruch considered it a work that ranks without question among the best that has been written in this genre in our time.
Gernsheim was a conservative composer and a friend of Johannes Brahms, to whom he is frequently compared. They met on 1862 and both shared their disregard for program music and lack of interest in opera. Gernsheim had learned much from Brahms, especially in his manner of working out thematic content and, to a lesser extent, in his manner of orchestration. However, his music also successfully melds together echoes of Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Spohr, Schubert and (of course) Brahms into a convincing style of his own. His first symphony, completed a year before Brahmss First saw the light of day, winningly melds the dramatic urgency of Beethoven, the melodic fluency of Mendelssohn, and the romantic ardour and harmonic richness of Schumann.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a dramatic and expressive main theme in G minor, introduced in piano by strings before rising in a fortissimo climax on full orchestra. The horn then introduces the lyrical and cantabile second theme in B-flat major, followed by the rest of woodwinds supported by strings. After an animato climax and a return to tranquillity, this entire exposition is then repeated, an archaic element unusual for the times. One can hear the influence of Beethoven in works such as the Coriolan Overture. The development focuses on the main theme, culminating in a rushing and passionate climax. The materials are then recapitulated, with the notable deviation of the second theme being in G major. The music returns to G minor for the coda, beginning in pianissisimo before reaching a thunderous fortissisimo peak, before the movement ends with a powerful restatement of the main theme.
The second movement is also written in sonata form, with some slight differences. It opens with a lyrical and nostalgic main theme in B-flat major, presented by horns, bassoons and clarinets. It is expressively taken by strings and rest of woodwinds. Then a calm and lyrical second theme in G-flat major, introduced by strings before woods join in as well, unfolded in a flowing counterpoint. The ensuing development is centred around the main theme, beginning in B-flat major and soon offering dramatic contrast with a G minor modulation, before returning to B-flat major. The recapitulation is inverted, beginning with the second theme before the main one both in the home key. A calm pianissimo chord then ends the larghetto.
The third movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a vigorously rhythmic main theme in E-flat major, introduced in pianissimo by strings before passing in forte to full orchestra. The first part of the scherzo is repeated before a bold C minor modulation. The head of the theme is restated, followed by a brief departure to A-flat major before returning to E-flat major. The trio section introduces a more melodic second theme in C major, taking the form of a march presented by clarinets and bassoons over pizzicati strings. After the music reaches a forte climax, the scherzo is repeated in its entirety. The movement ends with a brilliant coda.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: Self-Portrait with Cupid and Death (1875) by the German painter Hans Thoma.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/29gqa7pq and
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/yp7jshj5 Symphony No.1 in G minor - Friedrich Gernsheim](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OfLl19s4Hwk/mqdefault.jpg)



