Uploaded October 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
USSR Symphony Orchestra conducted by Yevgeny Svetlanov.
I - Andante cantabile (0:00) - Rondo (10:23)
Glinka's Andante cantabile and Rondo was composed circa 1823-4, written while he had an undemanding job in the civil service in St. Petersburg. The piece was never published during Glinka's lifetime, and remained in manuscript among his posthumous papers. It was not until 1955, almost a century after the composer's death, that it was edited and published in Moscow as part of the first volume of the Glinka Complete Edition.
At the time, Glinka became a musical dilettante and came under the influence of Charles Mayer, a former pupil of John Field who had attracted a large following of music students in the Russian capital. Mayer soon befriended the talented young man and encouraged him to compose works and submit them to his critique. It was at this time that Glinka wrote the andante cantabile and rondo, the most substantial piece of the period. These works show the composer's musical development in large forms as well as early preoccupations, such as ornamental counterpoint. The language employed here is a mixture of classical and romantic, with no use of Russian elements yet.
Despite being considered the father of Russian classical music, Glinka was almost completely self-taught, having only taken some piano lessons from his governess and Irish virtuoso John Field. His most important musical experiences came from two quite contradictory quarters: his work with his uncle's serf orchestra, near the family's country estate in Novospasskoye, and his 1823 tour of the Caucasus, ostensibly to cure his many imaginary illnesses, but more importantly to experience the indigenous music and dances of the local Circassian population. From the latter he obtained a lifelong fondness for folk subjects and characters, and from the former he gained a natural expertise in handling the orchestra, an ability which even his detractors have had to concede.
But the importance of his uncle's serf orchestra went beyond that, for they played a rather impressive repertoire that came to serve as the bedrock of Glinka's compositional technique. Overtures by Cherubini and Méhul loomed large in their repertoire, but so did the overtures to Mozart's great operas (less Abduction and Così fan tutte) and Beethoven's Fidelio. Glinka's task, while still a teenager, was to train the peasants to play their parts note-perfectly over a period of weeks. In this way he gained not only a full overview of the music's orchestration, but also a detailed grasp of its form and workmanship. It was an invaluable experience and one comparable, in its way, to Wagner's writing out of the score of Beethoven's Ninth at roughly the same age.
The piece is divided in two main sections. The andante cantabile begins with a deliberate and romantic main theme in D minor, presented by strings with great expression. It is soon taken by clarinet and rest of woodwinds, and then gradually unfolded. After it is reexposed from the beginning, the material is developed in the form of several continuous variations composed of modulations and dramatic alterations of the material. The andante then seamlessly leads to the second section.
The rondo (A-B-A'-C-A''-B''-A'''-Coda) opens with a rhythmic and agitated main theme in D minor, clearly derived from the main theme of the andante and reminiscent of Beethoven. In contrast, the second theme is elegant and graceful, introduced by the clarinet over strings accompaniment. The main material is then forcefully restated, building towards a climax. Then a deeply lyrical third theme is then presented by woodwinds over gentle string arpeggios. The main theme is recapitulated in a varied way, followed by the second in a minor key. A rushing coda then ends the work with a dramatic and passionate gesture.
Picture: "A Turkish Girl" (1837-8) by Russian painter Karl Bryullov.
Musical analysis written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/26fh9f9g
Unfortunately, the score is not available.
USSR Symphony Orchestra conducted by Yevgeny Svetlanov.
I - Andante cantabile (0:00) - Rondo (10:23)
Glinka's Andante cantabile and Rondo was composed circa 1823-4, written while he had an undemanding job in the civil service in St. Petersburg. The piece was never published during Glinka's lifetime, and remained in manuscript among his posthumous papers. It was not until 1955, almost a century after the composer's death, that it was edited and published in Moscow as part of the first volume of the Glinka Complete Edition.
At the time, Glinka became a musical dilettante and came under the influence of Charles Mayer, a former pupil of John Field who had attracted a large following of music students in the Russian capital. Mayer soon befriended the talented young man and encouraged him to compose works and submit them to his critique. It was at this time that Glinka wrote the andante cantabile and rondo, the most substantial piece of the period. These works show the composer's musical development in large forms as well as early preoccupations, such as ornamental counterpoint. The language employed here is a mixture of classical and romantic, with no use of Russian elements yet.
Despite being considered the father of Russian classical music, Glinka was almost completely self-taught, having only taken some piano lessons from his governess and Irish virtuoso John Field. His most important musical experiences came from two quite contradictory quarters: his work with his uncle's serf orchestra, near the family's country estate in Novospasskoye, and his 1823 tour of the Caucasus, ostensibly to cure his many imaginary illnesses, but more importantly to experience the indigenous music and dances of the local Circassian population. From the latter he obtained a lifelong fondness for folk subjects and characters, and from the former he gained a natural expertise in handling the orchestra, an ability which even his detractors have had to concede.
But the importance of his uncle's serf orchestra went beyond that, for they played a rather impressive repertoire that came to serve as the bedrock of Glinka's compositional technique. Overtures by Cherubini and Méhul loomed large in their repertoire, but so did the overtures to Mozart's great operas (less Abduction and Così fan tutte) and Beethoven's Fidelio. Glinka's task, while still a teenager, was to train the peasants to play their parts note-perfectly over a period of weeks. In this way he gained not only a full overview of the music's orchestration, but also a detailed grasp of its form and workmanship. It was an invaluable experience and one comparable, in its way, to Wagner's writing out of the score of Beethoven's Ninth at roughly the same age.
The piece is divided in two main sections. The andante cantabile begins with a deliberate and romantic main theme in D minor, presented by strings with great expression. It is soon taken by clarinet and rest of woodwinds, and then gradually unfolded. After it is reexposed from the beginning, the material is developed in the form of several continuous variations composed of modulations and dramatic alterations of the material. The andante then seamlessly leads to the second section.
The rondo (A-B-A'-C-A''-B''-A'''-Coda) opens with a rhythmic and agitated main theme in D minor, clearly derived from the main theme of the andante and reminiscent of Beethoven. In contrast, the second theme is elegant and graceful, introduced by the clarinet over strings accompaniment. The main material is then forcefully restated, building towards a climax. Then a deeply lyrical third theme is then presented by woodwinds over gentle string arpeggios. The main theme is recapitulated in a varied way, followed by the second in a minor key. A rushing coda then ends the work with a dramatic and passionate gesture.
Picture: "A Turkish Girl" (1837-8) by Russian painter Karl Bryullov.
Musical analysis written by myself. Source: tinyurl.com/26fh9f9g
Unfortunately, the score is not available.









![Symphony No.1 in G minor - Friedrich Gernsheim
Mainz Philharmonic State Orchestra conducted by Hermann Bäumer.
I - Allegro moderato (𝅗𝅥 = 69) - A tempo ma un poco più sostenuto - Animato - Tempo I - Vivo ed appassionato - Tempo I - A tempo ma un poco più sostenuto - Animato - Molto tranquillo: 0:00
II - Larghetto (𝅘𝅥𝅮 = 72) - Andante (𝅘𝅥 = 72) - Tempo I - Andante - Tempo I: 15:24
III - Scherzo. Vivace (𝅗𝅥. = 100) - Trio. Meno mosso. Marschmässig (𝅘𝅥. = 63) - Da capo scherzo - Coda. Più mosso: 25:09
IV - Finale. Allegro moderato assai (𝅗𝅥 = 66) - Con fuoco ed animato - Tranquillo - Con fuoco - Sehr breit und ruhig, wie zu anfang - Con fuoco ed animato - Tranquillo - Animato - Molto allegro e sempre stringendo al fine: 32:51
Gernsheims Symphony No.1 was composed on 1874, being premiered in Rotterdam on February 25 of 1875, during the composer’s tenure there as Music Director of the city’s Philharmonic Society. The piece was a great success, and it was soon played in Cologne, Leipzig, and Munich, among other places. The symphony is actually not Gernsheim’s first; an earlier effort in E-flat major was composed in 1857 during his stay in Paris, but this work remains unknown to this day. The piece was very well received, Max Bruch considered it a work that ranks without question among the best that has been written in this genre in our time.
Gernsheim was a conservative composer and a friend of Johannes Brahms, to whom he is frequently compared. They met on 1862 and both shared their disregard for program music and lack of interest in opera. Gernsheim had learned much from Brahms, especially in his manner of working out thematic content and, to a lesser extent, in his manner of orchestration. However, his music also successfully melds together echoes of Beethoven, Mendelssohn, Spohr, Schubert and (of course) Brahms into a convincing style of his own. His first symphony, completed a year before Brahmss First saw the light of day, winningly melds the dramatic urgency of Beethoven, the melodic fluency of Mendelssohn, and the romantic ardour and harmonic richness of Schumann.
The first movement is structured in sonata form. It begins with a dramatic and expressive main theme in G minor, introduced in piano by strings before rising in a fortissimo climax on full orchestra. The horn then introduces the lyrical and cantabile second theme in B-flat major, followed by the rest of woodwinds supported by strings. After an animato climax and a return to tranquillity, this entire exposition is then repeated, an archaic element unusual for the times. One can hear the influence of Beethoven in works such as the Coriolan Overture. The development focuses on the main theme, culminating in a rushing and passionate climax. The materials are then recapitulated, with the notable deviation of the second theme being in G major. The music returns to G minor for the coda, beginning in pianissisimo before reaching a thunderous fortissisimo peak, before the movement ends with a powerful restatement of the main theme.
The second movement is also written in sonata form, with some slight differences. It opens with a lyrical and nostalgic main theme in B-flat major, presented by horns, bassoons and clarinets. It is expressively taken by strings and rest of woodwinds. Then a calm and lyrical second theme in G-flat major, introduced by strings before woods join in as well, unfolded in a flowing counterpoint. The ensuing development is centred around the main theme, beginning in B-flat major and soon offering dramatic contrast with a G minor modulation, before returning to B-flat major. The recapitulation is inverted, beginning with the second theme before the main one both in the home key. A calm pianissimo chord then ends the larghetto.
The third movement is a scherzo in ternary form. It begins with a vigorously rhythmic main theme in E-flat major, introduced in pianissimo by strings before passing in forte to full orchestra. The first part of the scherzo is repeated before a bold C minor modulation. The head of the theme is restated, followed by a brief departure to A-flat major before returning to E-flat major. The trio section introduces a more melodic second theme in C major, taking the form of a march presented by clarinets and bassoons over pizzicati strings. After the music reaches a forte climax, the scherzo is repeated in its entirety. The movement ends with a brilliant coda.
[Musical analysis continued in the comments section].
Picture: Self-Portrait with Cupid and Death (1875) by the German painter Hans Thoma.
Musical analysis written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/29gqa7pq and
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/yp7jshj5 Symphony No.1 in G minor - Friedrich Gernsheim](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OfLl19s4Hwk/mqdefault.jpg)
