Uploaded June 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This take is about as anti-fiction as you can get.
// The same way fictional non-consensual acts exist. Only the representation of it is already enough. That's why they are both considered illegal.
Wow. You just said representation of fictional non-consensual acts is illegal. Let's put aside the many "romance" books that these TikTok women love to buy and read that are sold on many western bookstores. You can watch The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo on streaming, the Rooney Mara and the Noomi Rapace version. You can watch I Spit in Your Grave on streaming. You can watch Revenge on streaming. You can watch Shutter on streaming. You can watch Shimoneta on streaming. You can read fictional stories and see drawings or comics depicting non-consensual acts online, and they're not even on the dark web. What's so "illegal" about the representation of non-consensual acts in fiction?
// There are children being harmed because that content normalizes a perspective that children are a sexual property that can be taken advantage of.
Good thing that young anime characters are not real children, right? Or can you not tell the difference?
// That's real violence because it has real consequences against children.
No. It's the real abuse content featuring real people that has consequences, not the "abuse" content featuring made-up characters that are not real. No one is being abused for consuming fiction. I suggest you back off.
This take is about as anti-fiction as you can get.
// The same way fictional non-consensual acts exist. Only the representation of it is already enough. That's why they are both considered illegal.
Wow. You just said representation of fictional non-consensual acts is illegal. Let's put aside the many "romance" books that these TikTok women love to buy and read that are sold on many western bookstores. You can watch The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo on streaming, the Rooney Mara and the Noomi Rapace version. You can watch I Spit in Your Grave on streaming. You can watch Revenge on streaming. You can watch Shutter on streaming. You can watch Shimoneta on streaming. You can read fictional stories and see drawings or comics depicting non-consensual acts online, and they're not even on the dark web. What's so "illegal" about the representation of non-consensual acts in fiction?
// There are children being harmed because that content normalizes a perspective that children are a sexual property that can be taken advantage of.
Good thing that young anime characters are not real children, right? Or can you not tell the difference?
// That's real violence because it has real consequences against children.
No. It's the real abuse content featuring real people that has consequences, not the "abuse" content featuring made-up characters that are not real. No one is being abused for consuming fiction. I suggest you back off.
