HappyCabbie | TheProof - LifeInATent cleans up the internets @HappyCabbie | Uploaded June 2012 | Updated October 2024, 13 hours ago.
twitter.com
blogtv.com/people/happycabbie
A follow up on youtube.com/watch?v=0LWAP6tnMLI and the discussion we had on BlogTV
LifeInATent does have a history of going after reply channels back when they were competing with MeganSpeaks. Here he is trying to interfere with someone's AdSense
productforums.google.com/d/msg/adsense/gNdHUfetnKY/STYGLrabtGIJ
productforums.google.com/forum/#!searchin/adsense/lifeinatenttv/adsense/aLRozr4SMjo/avYldvNf-jYJ
Here is some of his posts in the YouTube forums
productforums.google.com/forum/#!searchin/youtube/lifeinatenttv/youtube/SpnaMHhDtY4/gZ6aIaqebEIJ
Here you can read LifeInATent state that he doesn't have a problem with reply channels but only has a problem when they show cleavage. productforums.google.com/d/msg/youtube/Gp5etSr375U/UibJi6kJgvEJ
He now posts under LifeInATentTV in the help forums because LifeInATent was banned from the forums for exactly these type of posts in the forums.
Now just last month LifeInATent was defending reply channels as seen here
youtube.com/watch?v=kYtho9c1dTE&feature=youtu.be
and if you forward to 2:38 you can see him defend the use of boobs to gain views, something he previously found offensive and now finds offensive again.
So the question is this, why was he defending reply videos when Megan was making them, but now that she no longer is, he is trying to shut down anyone who does them. Sorry, but the timing is highly dubious and I do have to call bullwinkle.
Check out the YouTube Creator Playbook, it is free youtube.com/yt/creators/playbook.html
From page 41
"Only add tags to the tag section of your metadata. Adding additional
tags to the description of your video constitutes spam and may
result in the removal of your video or demotion in search, or account
termination."
It is because so many people do this that videos get flagged down for spam
twitter.com
blogtv.com/people/happycabbie
A follow up on youtube.com/watch?v=0LWAP6tnMLI and the discussion we had on BlogTV
LifeInATent does have a history of going after reply channels back when they were competing with MeganSpeaks. Here he is trying to interfere with someone's AdSense
productforums.google.com/d/msg/adsense/gNdHUfetnKY/STYGLrabtGIJ
productforums.google.com/forum/#!searchin/adsense/lifeinatenttv/adsense/aLRozr4SMjo/avYldvNf-jYJ
Here is some of his posts in the YouTube forums
productforums.google.com/forum/#!searchin/youtube/lifeinatenttv/youtube/SpnaMHhDtY4/gZ6aIaqebEIJ
Here you can read LifeInATent state that he doesn't have a problem with reply channels but only has a problem when they show cleavage. productforums.google.com/d/msg/youtube/Gp5etSr375U/UibJi6kJgvEJ
He now posts under LifeInATentTV in the help forums because LifeInATent was banned from the forums for exactly these type of posts in the forums.
Now just last month LifeInATent was defending reply channels as seen here
youtube.com/watch?v=kYtho9c1dTE&feature=youtu.be
and if you forward to 2:38 you can see him defend the use of boobs to gain views, something he previously found offensive and now finds offensive again.
So the question is this, why was he defending reply videos when Megan was making them, but now that she no longer is, he is trying to shut down anyone who does them. Sorry, but the timing is highly dubious and I do have to call bullwinkle.
Check out the YouTube Creator Playbook, it is free youtube.com/yt/creators/playbook.html
From page 41
"Only add tags to the tag section of your metadata. Adding additional
tags to the description of your video constitutes spam and may
result in the removal of your video or demotion in search, or account
termination."
It is because so many people do this that videos get flagged down for spam