Uploaded March 2025 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
In this video Air Commodore Fin Monahan will examine how RAF organisational culture emerged, highlighting some of its key features, and how this research is being brought to bear as part of the ASTRA innovation programme.
This free lecture is part of the RAF Museum's Research Lecture Programme. If you would like to support the RAF Museum, you can make a donation at: support.rafmuseum.org/Donate-Now
TALK OUTLINE
The first independent air force, the Royal Air Force, was formed on 1 April 1918 during the First World War. It was a merger of the Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Naval Air Service. Its leaders and personnel brought cultural predispositions with them from their former services.
Moreover, the RAF formed against the cultural backdrop of highly codified British class based society. The leaders of the new Service represented a fairly narrow cross-section of that society and the way they setup the RAF was indicative of that.
With the express aim of developing an ‘Air Force spirit’ they developed a fully functioning system of orders, regulations, doctrine, tactics and flying standards underpinned by a functional structure that laid out, for their personnel, the way to behave, fly and fight.
A range of artefacts was introduced including a new uniform, badges, coats of arms, memorials, an Ensign and a global network of RAF stations. Many of the artefacts, processes, practices, traditions, rituals and customs that were instituted were, like their leaders, representative of a traditional military organisation of its era.
However, as RAF personnel responded to the environment their leaders had established, a distinctive and new military culture rapidly emerged with its own slang, humour, sub cultures and attitudes towards life in the new service. But, as RAF culture became entrenched, some aspects of it would hinder progress and development of the Service.
Bringing a rich vein of new material to light, this paper will examine how RAF organisational culture emerged highlighting some of its key features. It will also underline how the author’s research is being brought to bear as part of the RAF’s ASTRA innovation programme as the Service embraces space, autonomy, artificial intelligence, and cyberspace.
This lecture was first broadcast on the Museum's Crowdcast Channel in 2021.
In this video Air Commodore Fin Monahan will examine how RAF organisational culture emerged, highlighting some of its key features, and how this research is being brought to bear as part of the ASTRA innovation programme.
This free lecture is part of the RAF Museum's Research Lecture Programme. If you would like to support the RAF Museum, you can make a donation at: support.rafmuseum.org/Donate-Now
TALK OUTLINE
The first independent air force, the Royal Air Force, was formed on 1 April 1918 during the First World War. It was a merger of the Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Naval Air Service. Its leaders and personnel brought cultural predispositions with them from their former services.
Moreover, the RAF formed against the cultural backdrop of highly codified British class based society. The leaders of the new Service represented a fairly narrow cross-section of that society and the way they setup the RAF was indicative of that.
With the express aim of developing an ‘Air Force spirit’ they developed a fully functioning system of orders, regulations, doctrine, tactics and flying standards underpinned by a functional structure that laid out, for their personnel, the way to behave, fly and fight.
A range of artefacts was introduced including a new uniform, badges, coats of arms, memorials, an Ensign and a global network of RAF stations. Many of the artefacts, processes, practices, traditions, rituals and customs that were instituted were, like their leaders, representative of a traditional military organisation of its era.
However, as RAF personnel responded to the environment their leaders had established, a distinctive and new military culture rapidly emerged with its own slang, humour, sub cultures and attitudes towards life in the new service. But, as RAF culture became entrenched, some aspects of it would hinder progress and development of the Service.
Bringing a rich vein of new material to light, this paper will examine how RAF organisational culture emerged highlighting some of its key features. It will also underline how the author’s research is being brought to bear as part of the RAF’s ASTRA innovation programme as the Service embraces space, autonomy, artificial intelligence, and cyberspace.
This lecture was first broadcast on the Museum's Crowdcast Channel in 2021.






![The End of Gentlemanly Warfare Great Britain’s Evolving Arguments for Strategic Bombing 1930 - 1945
In this lecture Katie Brown analyses the rhetoric employed in British arguments for and against strategic bombing.
This free Trenchard lecture is supported by the Royal Aeronautical Society and is part of the RAF Museums Research Lecture Programme. You can find out more about the RAeS at http://www.aerosociety.com/
If you would like to support the RAF Museum, you can make a donation at: https://support.rafmuseum.org/Donate-Now
TALK OUTLINE
In a 1932 House of Commons debate, the Lord President of the Council Stanley Baldwin uttered his now infamous warning that “the bomber will always get through.”
More notably, he went on to argue that “[t]he only defence is an offence, which means that you have to kill more women and children more quickly than the enemy if you want to save yourselves.”
Baldwin’s statements, while originating as a call for disarmament, quickly became a rallying cry for both the “militarists” in Great Britain—individuals who supported the continued supply of British defences—and the “pacifists”—those who fought for aerial restrictions and the outlawry of war.
Why then was it so important for Baldwin, and those who would later parrot his phrasing, to focus specifically on the murdering of women and children to justify disarmament?
Traditionally, British society had gendered pacifism and calls for disarmament as feminine. Yet, Baldwin was a prominent male politician evoking a standard masculine, patriarchal martial ideal of protecting the state and the weaker women and children as justification for pacifist ideology.
While militarists in the interwar years also commonly evoked the chivalric tenant to justify war, it became increasingly common for pacifists, both male and female, to call for the end of global war in order to protect women and children.
What then accounted for the change in the pacifist argument, this masculinization of peace? Did Britons’ concern for “the fairer sex” reach to other, non-British nations?
This paper applies a gendered lens to analyse and deconstruct the rhetoric surrounding the disputes, and in turn provides a nuanced interpretation of British arguments for and against strategic bombing to answer these questions.
This lecture was first broadcast in 2021 The End of Gentlemanly Warfare Great Britain’s Evolving Arguments for Strategic Bombing 1930 - 1945](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XqqZTLbYN3E/mqdefault.jpg)



