Uploaded March 2025 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
In this free online talk Victoria Taylor examines combat motivation, experience, and morale in the Luftwaffe and how this could differ across the service and the theatres it fought within.
This free lecture is part of the RAF Museum's Research Lecture Programme.
If you would like to support the RAF Museum, you can make a donation at: support.rafmuseum.org/Donate-Now
Talk Outline
‘I'm lying here in a village outside Leningrad. The bullets and grenades fly back and forth. What is man against it?’ This fraught letter from the mid-throes of Operation BARBAROSSA came not from a soldier with the German Heer (army), as one might expect, but instead from a low-ranking Luftwaffe serviceman with the Luftnachrichten-Regiment 11 (Air Signals Regiment 11) on 21 September 1941.
In a topic that is dominated by the post-war memoirs of the famous German fighter aces, the Luftwaffe’s historians have often neglected the lived-in combat experiences of its men across the organisation’s ranks and roles during the Second World War.
That air signals units, anti-aircraft personnel, and even bomber crews sometimes became embroiled in brutal close-range fighting on the ground, or that the medical personnel tasked with patching up casualties in the flying arms were haunted by the broken airmen they attended to, rarely factors into our general understanding of the Luftwaffe’s wartime history.
When a wider swathe of letters from both its flying and non-flying personnel are considered, a more complex and contradictory image of the Luftwaffe begins to appear – especially when considering its various sources of combat motivation, from their families to the Führer.
Drawing upon original letters sent home to their loved ones in the Third Reich and other contemporary sources, such as the Allied interrogations of captured Luftwaffe personnel, this lecture considers how combat motivation, experience, and morale could differ across the Luftwaffe and the theatres it fought within, although opinions of the war’s direction among its multiple branches could also vary considerably even when they were serving on the same front.
In turn, this allows a more thorough perception of its operational culture, esprit de corps (or, in some cases, lack thereof), and eventual collapse to be more thoroughly developed beyond the gunsights of the Luftwaffe’s fighter pilots.
About Victoria Taylor
Victoria Taylor is a PhD candidate at the University of Hull and Sheffield Hallam University, where she is completing her thesis on the Luftwaffe and National Socialism in the Third Reich.
For this doctoral research, she was awarded the 2020 Royal Air Force Museum Doctoral Academic Prize in 2021.
She also completed her Masters in Historical Research (MRes) on Britain’s wartime and post-war mythologization of Operation CHASTISE at Hull, for which she was awarded the Royal Air Force Museum’s RAF Centenary Master’s Academic Prize in 2019.
Victoria’s specialisation is in the history of airpower, aviation, and the public imagination. Her main focus is on British and German aviation during the interwar period and the Second World War, which she has frequently covered during her past collaborations with the BBC, the Royal Air Force Benevolent Fund, and History Hit.
This lecture was first broadcast in 2022
In this free online talk Victoria Taylor examines combat motivation, experience, and morale in the Luftwaffe and how this could differ across the service and the theatres it fought within.
This free lecture is part of the RAF Museum's Research Lecture Programme.
If you would like to support the RAF Museum, you can make a donation at: support.rafmuseum.org/Donate-Now
Talk Outline
‘I'm lying here in a village outside Leningrad. The bullets and grenades fly back and forth. What is man against it?’ This fraught letter from the mid-throes of Operation BARBAROSSA came not from a soldier with the German Heer (army), as one might expect, but instead from a low-ranking Luftwaffe serviceman with the Luftnachrichten-Regiment 11 (Air Signals Regiment 11) on 21 September 1941.
In a topic that is dominated by the post-war memoirs of the famous German fighter aces, the Luftwaffe’s historians have often neglected the lived-in combat experiences of its men across the organisation’s ranks and roles during the Second World War.
That air signals units, anti-aircraft personnel, and even bomber crews sometimes became embroiled in brutal close-range fighting on the ground, or that the medical personnel tasked with patching up casualties in the flying arms were haunted by the broken airmen they attended to, rarely factors into our general understanding of the Luftwaffe’s wartime history.
When a wider swathe of letters from both its flying and non-flying personnel are considered, a more complex and contradictory image of the Luftwaffe begins to appear – especially when considering its various sources of combat motivation, from their families to the Führer.
Drawing upon original letters sent home to their loved ones in the Third Reich and other contemporary sources, such as the Allied interrogations of captured Luftwaffe personnel, this lecture considers how combat motivation, experience, and morale could differ across the Luftwaffe and the theatres it fought within, although opinions of the war’s direction among its multiple branches could also vary considerably even when they were serving on the same front.
In turn, this allows a more thorough perception of its operational culture, esprit de corps (or, in some cases, lack thereof), and eventual collapse to be more thoroughly developed beyond the gunsights of the Luftwaffe’s fighter pilots.
About Victoria Taylor
Victoria Taylor is a PhD candidate at the University of Hull and Sheffield Hallam University, where she is completing her thesis on the Luftwaffe and National Socialism in the Third Reich.
For this doctoral research, she was awarded the 2020 Royal Air Force Museum Doctoral Academic Prize in 2021.
She also completed her Masters in Historical Research (MRes) on Britain’s wartime and post-war mythologization of Operation CHASTISE at Hull, for which she was awarded the Royal Air Force Museum’s RAF Centenary Master’s Academic Prize in 2019.
Victoria’s specialisation is in the history of airpower, aviation, and the public imagination. Her main focus is on British and German aviation during the interwar period and the Second World War, which she has frequently covered during her past collaborations with the BBC, the Royal Air Force Benevolent Fund, and History Hit.
This lecture was first broadcast in 2022




![The End of Gentlemanly Warfare Great Britain’s Evolving Arguments for Strategic Bombing 1930 - 1945
In this lecture Katie Brown analyses the rhetoric employed in British arguments for and against strategic bombing.
This free Trenchard lecture is supported by the Royal Aeronautical Society and is part of the RAF Museums Research Lecture Programme. You can find out more about the RAeS at http://www.aerosociety.com/
If you would like to support the RAF Museum, you can make a donation at: https://support.rafmuseum.org/Donate-Now
TALK OUTLINE
In a 1932 House of Commons debate, the Lord President of the Council Stanley Baldwin uttered his now infamous warning that “the bomber will always get through.”
More notably, he went on to argue that “[t]he only defence is an offence, which means that you have to kill more women and children more quickly than the enemy if you want to save yourselves.”
Baldwin’s statements, while originating as a call for disarmament, quickly became a rallying cry for both the “militarists” in Great Britain—individuals who supported the continued supply of British defences—and the “pacifists”—those who fought for aerial restrictions and the outlawry of war.
Why then was it so important for Baldwin, and those who would later parrot his phrasing, to focus specifically on the murdering of women and children to justify disarmament?
Traditionally, British society had gendered pacifism and calls for disarmament as feminine. Yet, Baldwin was a prominent male politician evoking a standard masculine, patriarchal martial ideal of protecting the state and the weaker women and children as justification for pacifist ideology.
While militarists in the interwar years also commonly evoked the chivalric tenant to justify war, it became increasingly common for pacifists, both male and female, to call for the end of global war in order to protect women and children.
What then accounted for the change in the pacifist argument, this masculinization of peace? Did Britons’ concern for “the fairer sex” reach to other, non-British nations?
This paper applies a gendered lens to analyse and deconstruct the rhetoric surrounding the disputes, and in turn provides a nuanced interpretation of British arguments for and against strategic bombing to answer these questions.
This lecture was first broadcast in 2021 The End of Gentlemanly Warfare Great Britain’s Evolving Arguments for Strategic Bombing 1930 - 1945](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XqqZTLbYN3E/mqdefault.jpg)





