Uploaded January 2025 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
On 6 September 1939, three days after Britain declared war with Nazi Germany, Montagu Hulton-Harrop became the first Royal Air Force fighter pilot to be shot down during the Second World War.
The tragic tale of Hulton-Harrop is worsened by the fact that he was shot down by his own side. Two RAF spitfire pilots faced a court martial and the resulting investigation shed light on many frailties in the famed “Dowding System”.
The Battle of Barking Creek, as it was labelled by RAF personnel, was shrouded in strict secrecy at the time. Throughout the years that followed it became a folk-lore like short anecdote, retold over and over again by historians, journalists, and in the memoires of the pilots involved.
Recollections of the incident differed greatly from story to story and details were often completely wrong.
This talk presents the results of the first forensic investigation into the Battle of Barking Creek and the exact series of events that caused the incident.
Using previously restricted documents that have recently been released by the National Archives Nick Black will re-construct the incident in its entirety, controverting the popular narrative and giving a thorough analysis of who, or what, was to blame for Hulton-Harrop’s death, and what the RAF learned that helped them in the Battle of Britain less than a year later.
The events surrounding the Battle of Barking Creek offers an insight into the RAF’s preparations for war with Germany and allows a glimpse inside the minds of young, eager and sometimes inexperienced fighter pilots in their first taste of aerial combat.
The episode also adds extra context to the lives of some legendary fighter aces including “Sailor” Malan, John Freeborn, and Roger Bushell.
This lecture was first broadcast in 2021.
On 6 September 1939, three days after Britain declared war with Nazi Germany, Montagu Hulton-Harrop became the first Royal Air Force fighter pilot to be shot down during the Second World War.
The tragic tale of Hulton-Harrop is worsened by the fact that he was shot down by his own side. Two RAF spitfire pilots faced a court martial and the resulting investigation shed light on many frailties in the famed “Dowding System”.
The Battle of Barking Creek, as it was labelled by RAF personnel, was shrouded in strict secrecy at the time. Throughout the years that followed it became a folk-lore like short anecdote, retold over and over again by historians, journalists, and in the memoires of the pilots involved.
Recollections of the incident differed greatly from story to story and details were often completely wrong.
This talk presents the results of the first forensic investigation into the Battle of Barking Creek and the exact series of events that caused the incident.
Using previously restricted documents that have recently been released by the National Archives Nick Black will re-construct the incident in its entirety, controverting the popular narrative and giving a thorough analysis of who, or what, was to blame for Hulton-Harrop’s death, and what the RAF learned that helped them in the Battle of Britain less than a year later.
The events surrounding the Battle of Barking Creek offers an insight into the RAF’s preparations for war with Germany and allows a glimpse inside the minds of young, eager and sometimes inexperienced fighter pilots in their first taste of aerial combat.
The episode also adds extra context to the lives of some legendary fighter aces including “Sailor” Malan, John Freeborn, and Roger Bushell.
This lecture was first broadcast in 2021.
![The End of Gentlemanly Warfare Great Britain’s Evolving Arguments for Strategic Bombing 1930 - 1945
In this lecture Katie Brown analyses the rhetoric employed in British arguments for and against strategic bombing.
This free Trenchard lecture is supported by the Royal Aeronautical Society and is part of the RAF Museums Research Lecture Programme. You can find out more about the RAeS at http://www.aerosociety.com/
If you would like to support the RAF Museum, you can make a donation at: https://support.rafmuseum.org/Donate-Now
TALK OUTLINE
In a 1932 House of Commons debate, the Lord President of the Council Stanley Baldwin uttered his now infamous warning that “the bomber will always get through.”
More notably, he went on to argue that “[t]he only defence is an offence, which means that you have to kill more women and children more quickly than the enemy if you want to save yourselves.”
Baldwin’s statements, while originating as a call for disarmament, quickly became a rallying cry for both the “militarists” in Great Britain—individuals who supported the continued supply of British defences—and the “pacifists”—those who fought for aerial restrictions and the outlawry of war.
Why then was it so important for Baldwin, and those who would later parrot his phrasing, to focus specifically on the murdering of women and children to justify disarmament?
Traditionally, British society had gendered pacifism and calls for disarmament as feminine. Yet, Baldwin was a prominent male politician evoking a standard masculine, patriarchal martial ideal of protecting the state and the weaker women and children as justification for pacifist ideology.
While militarists in the interwar years also commonly evoked the chivalric tenant to justify war, it became increasingly common for pacifists, both male and female, to call for the end of global war in order to protect women and children.
What then accounted for the change in the pacifist argument, this masculinization of peace? Did Britons’ concern for “the fairer sex” reach to other, non-British nations?
This paper applies a gendered lens to analyse and deconstruct the rhetoric surrounding the disputes, and in turn provides a nuanced interpretation of British arguments for and against strategic bombing to answer these questions.
This lecture was first broadcast in 2021 The End of Gentlemanly Warfare Great Britain’s Evolving Arguments for Strategic Bombing 1930 - 1945](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XqqZTLbYN3E/mqdefault.jpg)









