Uploaded February 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Most people think YouTube videos sound bad because of microphones, compression, or creators doing something wrong.
Often, it isn’t.
In this video I’m talking about the viewer side of YouTube - the things you control but probably never touch. Audio choices. Playback speed. Subtitles - including moving them so they don’t get in the way.
These aren’t tricks or hacks. They’re just tools that already exist, quietly improving the experience if you let them.
A small change to how you listen can make a bigger difference than new speakers, headphones, or blaming the algorithm.
Watch it properly.
Use the controls.
Enjoy the video.
Most people think YouTube videos sound bad because of microphones, compression, or creators doing something wrong.
Often, it isn’t.
In this video I’m talking about the viewer side of YouTube - the things you control but probably never touch. Audio choices. Playback speed. Subtitles - including moving them so they don’t get in the way.
These aren’t tricks or hacks. They’re just tools that already exist, quietly improving the experience if you let them.
A small change to how you listen can make a bigger difference than new speakers, headphones, or blaming the algorithm.
Watch it properly.
Use the controls.
Enjoy the video.

![RESULTS: What the Data Actually Says: Vertical vs Delta Loop on 40m
This video demonstrates a clean, repeatable method for comparing antennas using WSPR via fixed time slots, fixed power, and real data - not opinions. It is not about comparison done by ear, S-meters, or quick swaps - which can lead to the wrong conclusion.
What this video covers:
- A practical A/B antenna testing method using WSPR
- Why ABABAB testing beats day-to-day comparisons
- How to log RX and TX properly
- How I analysed the data using ChatGPT as a coding assistant
- Why time of day matters more than people think
What this video is NOT
- Not a propagation report
- Not a claim that one antenna is best
- Not sponsored or influenced
Links
https://www.wsprnet.org/drupal/ - WSPRnet database
https://wspr.hb9vqq.ch/ HB9VQQ - Sanity-check site
https://mega.nz/folder/IjZgkQCL#RsEp13CDeK2JvWTMiOuMyw - Files
EXACT CHATGPT PROMPT USED:
Hello ChatGPT.
I have conducted a controlled A/B antenna comparison using WSPR only.
Both antennas were tested:
at the same station
on the same band
at the same power
within clearly defined time windows
Nothing else was changed.
I am about to send you three files:
1 The Timeslots Log in UTC (which antenna was in use and exactly what time)
2 The Receive Log in UTC (work out which antenna was in at any time via the Timeslots log)
3 The Transmit log downloaded from WSPRnet in UTC
The logs are accurate and in clear two-minute chunks – there is no need to be concerned about the times.
My timeslot log includes the antenna label for every 2-minute WSPR slot (including RX-only slots).
Your tasks:
TX analysis: Identify which antenna was in use for each transmit period. For each antenna, calculate:
- total number of reports
- number of unique reporters
- median SNR (not maximum)
- median distance
Group TX results into distance buckets:
- short haul (0–2000 km)
- medium haul (2000–4000 km)
- long haul ([greater than] 4000 km)
For each bucket, show report count and median SNR.
RX analysis: Using the RX log, separate decodes by antenna and time window.
For each antenna, calculate:
- total decode count
- median RX SNR
- median distance (if available)
Output requirements:
Present results in clear tables.
Do not declare a single winner.
Explain what each antenna appears to be better suited for - based on the data.
Focus on differences in behaviour, coverage, and application rather than preference or opinion.
Base conclusions strictly on the data provided, not on predicted behaviour
Explain how you calculated the results
I will send the files in the next message. Please confirm you are comfortable with my prompt. RESULTS: What the Data Actually Says: Vertical vs Delta Loop on 40m](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/c845_k48EjI/mqdefault.jpg)








![Drama with the Dead-Man Tower / Anchor Upgrades
Important engineering upgrades in the antenna field - improving the foundations for the new lightweight tower, installing a Dead-Man anchor for the electric winch, and grounding the tower to the radial network.
The day starts with a look at the original winch post and the maths behind its load capacity. Although the first anchor could handle around 200 kg, the mechanical advantage of the increased height on the falling-derrick (not a “gin pole”!) introduced additional torque and stress. The solution? An engineered Dead-Man anchor buried crosswise - the same principle used in bridge and harbour design.
We pour, cure, and backfill the new anchor, review older ones, and make key decisions about reinforcement and concrete volume. Then its on to grounding: bonding the radial field directly to the tower base and cabinet using copper strap and self-amalgamating tape for long-term corrosion resistance.
Along the way, we cover:
➡️ Calculating load and fulcrum points on a small tower system
➡️ Practical tips for mixing and pouring small-batch concrete outdoors
➡️ Grounding and bonding strategy for multi-antenna installations
➡️ Managing radials around automated mowers
➡️ Handling real-world compromises when parts or materials are missing
Also featuring: spontaneous design decisions, visits from Junior and Django, drill bit snapping mid-hole!
By the end of the day, all anchors are upgraded, the tower base is bonded, and we’re ready for the next phase - raising the lightweight tower in time for CQ Worldwide.
0:00 – Intro & plan of attack
0:45 – Why the old anchor wasn’t enough
2:00 – Mixing and pouring the new concrete
6:00 – Upgrading existing anchors (and some decisions!)
8:00 – Explaining the Dead-Man concept
10:00 – Improvised engineering & “Callum moments”
13:30 – Dogs arrive on site
16:00 – Drilling, bending & building the Dead-Man anchor
20:00 – Grounding the tower and radials
23:00 – Review & next-phase tower talk
📡 More DX Commander builds:
➡️ [Signature 12.4 Setup and Test]
➡️ [40 m 4-Square Explained]
➡️ [Remote Station Build Series] Drama with the Dead-Man Tower / Anchor Upgrades](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eJWCe6fPe6Y/mqdefault.jpg)