Uploaded May 2019 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Dr Doom eagerly shows us her scant knowledge of biology and ecology and indeed her inability to research and preference to make shit up and blame it on her imaginary planet. So sad.
For anyone interested, here's a couple of links:
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/en/knowledge-and-statistics/red-tide.aspx
riob.org/IMG/pdf/Muthanna_Alomar.pdf
CREDITS:
Gulf News
thenational.ae
Khaleej Times
moccae.gov.ae
greenprophet.com
Pixabay
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Blood and Thunder" by Mastodon
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts. Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
Dr Doom eagerly shows us her scant knowledge of biology and ecology and indeed her inability to research and preference to make shit up and blame it on her imaginary planet. So sad.
For anyone interested, here's a couple of links:
https://www.moccae.gov.ae/en/knowledge-and-statistics/red-tide.aspx
riob.org/IMG/pdf/Muthanna_Alomar.pdf
CREDITS:
Gulf News
thenational.ae
Khaleej Times
moccae.gov.ae
greenprophet.com
Pixabay
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Blood and Thunder" by Mastodon
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts. Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
