Uploaded March 2020 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
You really would think Matt Rogers would learn from past mistakes and get a grip of himself! Obviously not!
CREDITS:
Danny McNeal
Nigel Rees
Becca Schenk
Directorate General of Meteorology Oman
David Kuttner
John Vasta
Gulf News
Met Office UK
Cloud Appreciation Society
strangesounds.org
kafe.com
dailyhive.com
wesawthat.blogspot.com
stuff.co.nz
geek.com
MUSIC CREDIT:
"King Liar" by Lord Nelson
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts. Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
You really would think Matt Rogers would learn from past mistakes and get a grip of himself! Obviously not!
CREDITS:
Danny McNeal
Nigel Rees
Becca Schenk
Directorate General of Meteorology Oman
David Kuttner
John Vasta
Gulf News
Met Office UK
Cloud Appreciation Society
strangesounds.org
kafe.com
dailyhive.com
wesawthat.blogspot.com
stuff.co.nz
geek.com
MUSIC CREDIT:
"King Liar" by Lord Nelson
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts. Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
