Uploaded April 2018 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Listening to the live stream and watching the chat, never heard so much conspiratorial claptrap since, well, last time! But this clip takes the biscuit lol! Oh and he was very rude to a lady in the chat who dared to have an opinion that didn't involve kissing his arse. Revolting little man.
#GetAGrip
CREDITS:
Richard Foster via Flickr
thinkstock
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Super Stupid" by Funkadelic
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
Listening to the live stream and watching the chat, never heard so much conspiratorial claptrap since, well, last time! But this clip takes the biscuit lol! Oh and he was very rude to a lady in the chat who dared to have an opinion that didn't involve kissing his arse. Revolting little man.
#GetAGrip
CREDITS:
Richard Foster via Flickr
thinkstock
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Super Stupid" by Funkadelic
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
