Uploaded March 2018 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
A new weekly series that detail the types of clouds we see in the sky. First off, the lovely swirly cirrus clouds.
Be assured, no mentions of chemtrails or invading planetary systems lol!
CREDITS:
Pixabay.com
Wikipedia
Pexels.com
MaxPixel.com
Met Office UK
geograph.com
alchetron.com
Stefan Bauer via CloudsOnline.com
CloudGallery.com
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Cloud Suite" by David Gates
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
A new weekly series that detail the types of clouds we see in the sky. First off, the lovely swirly cirrus clouds.
Be assured, no mentions of chemtrails or invading planetary systems lol!
CREDITS:
Pixabay.com
Wikipedia
Pexels.com
MaxPixel.com
Met Office UK
geograph.com
alchetron.com
Stefan Bauer via CloudsOnline.com
CloudGallery.com
MUSIC CREDIT:
"Cloud Suite" by David Gates
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting and research & is done in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said works was used , this was NOT a verbatim copy of the work & has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder although its content is "associated" with a specific person's work it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
