Uploaded March 2019 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Reads something on a conspiracy website, believes it is 'da troof'. Or alternatively, reads something on a conspiracy website and knows he can tell his braindead minions it's 'da troof'.
CREDITS:
Pixabay
Image Editor @ Flickr
mildenhall.af.mil
franslanting.photoshelter.com
Istockphoto
MUSIC CREDIT
"The Neverending Why" by Placebo
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting, & research & is done
in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably
copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said
works was used , this was NOT a verbatum copy of the work &
has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all
samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder
allthough its content is "associated" with a specific person's work
it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm
the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of
the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
Reads something on a conspiracy website, believes it is 'da troof'. Or alternatively, reads something on a conspiracy website and knows he can tell his braindead minions it's 'da troof'.
CREDITS:
Pixabay
Image Editor @ Flickr
mildenhall.af.mil
franslanting.photoshelter.com
Istockphoto
MUSIC CREDIT
"The Neverending Why" by Placebo
This work was produced under fair use for the purposes of
criticism, commentary, news reporting, & research & is done
in good faith & there is NO claim made to the original presumably
copyrighted work & only small portions of, or, a remixing of said
works was used , this was NOT a verbatum copy of the work &
has NO effect on the originals potential market use , further all
samples & excerpts were publicly posted BY the copyright holder
allthough its content is "associated" with a specific person's work
it is NOT endorsed by said person & was NOT created to harm
the individual in question , it was made to critique their work or acts.
Attempts by copyright holders to silence criticism by misuse of
the DMCA should result in the removal of their access to that tool.
