Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Albany Symphony Orchestra conducted by George Lloyd.
I - Introduction & Variations: Introduction. Tranquillo - Poco meno lento - Variation I. Comodo - Variation II. Grazioso - Variation III. Grave - Variation IV. Vivo (0:00) - Adagio (15:00) - Allegro (27:00)
Lloyd's Symphony No.12 was composed in 1989, being commissioned by the Albany Symphony Orchestra. It was premiered at the Troy Music Hall in Troy, New York, performed by the aforementioned orchestra conducted by the composer. Circa 1980, Lloyd revisited his early first three symphonies (written between 1932-3) with ambivalent feelings. He initially contemplated destroying them, but thankfully decided not to because it would require renumbering all his later ones. After revising the first, Lloyd was inspired by its formal structure, a single movement based on the variation principle, to model his last symphony after the first one.
After over twenty years of neglect, Lloyd's music was rediscovered by the public at large after a 1977 BBC broadcast performance of his Symphony No.8. The composer tonal postromanticism, which was deemed a regressive by the English musical establishment, was appreciated by the public. In addition to the BBC, Lloyd found a steadfast champion in the form of the Albany (New York) Symphony Orchestra, which played his music and commissioned more, and in the Albany Record Company, one of America's more enterprising high-quality compact disc labels. This symphony was both commissioned by that orchestra and recorded and released by that label.
The first section is structured as a theme and variations. It begins with a wistful motive on violins, which is the root of a lyrical and ambiguous main theme shared between strings and woodwinds. After a virtuosic clarinet solo transition, the instruments introduces a lyrical and cantabile second theme, with murmuring strings and harp accompaniment. This graceful melody is passed to flute and violins, continually varied and imbued with new orchestral colouring. The main theme is briefly recapitulated in a varied way. The first variation is pastoral in nature, with florid ornamentation of woodwinds. The of colourful orchestration. After a brief climax, the third variation opens with dissonant chords, followed by a funereal transformation of the main theme. The final variation is festive and animated, with prominent use of tambourine, xylophone and marimba leading to a vigorous climax. A brief pause leads to the next part.
The second section is an adagio in form of an arch. It opens with reminiscences of the second theme from the previous part, which unfolds into a deeply lyrical way between low and upper strings. Follows a serene passage dominated by strings, the music becoming more expressive and emotional. A contrasting, more melancholic passage leads us to a passionate and sustained climax. The main theme of the previous part returns in a dramatic and dissonant conclusion to this climax. After a diminuendo, the adagio ends with a serene and evocative coda, before the finale suddenly springs forth.
The third section is an allegro in a modified sonata form. It begins with reminiscences of the rhythmic opening motive of the symphony, contrasted by gentle melodic phrases. Follows an intricate fugato development of the motive. A march-like idea is also introduced by the brass, which is soon developed in another impetuous fugato, growing in a crescendo to an imperious and agitated climax. The scoring is highly imaginative, bringing the extensive percussion into play. A contrasting and florid transition leads to a varied recapitulation of the themes, culminating in a contrapuntal climax in which the material is cleverly combined. Another seismic conclusion to rival that of its predecessor is shrewdly avoided, and a quiet lento coda is substituted, its texture coloured by the unearthly sounds of celesta and harp.
Picture: Three paintings by Greek painter Hero Kanakakis.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/26sy7ec7 and tinyurl.com/2af9zwup
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.
Albany Symphony Orchestra conducted by George Lloyd.
I - Introduction & Variations: Introduction. Tranquillo - Poco meno lento - Variation I. Comodo - Variation II. Grazioso - Variation III. Grave - Variation IV. Vivo (0:00) - Adagio (15:00) - Allegro (27:00)
Lloyd's Symphony No.12 was composed in 1989, being commissioned by the Albany Symphony Orchestra. It was premiered at the Troy Music Hall in Troy, New York, performed by the aforementioned orchestra conducted by the composer. Circa 1980, Lloyd revisited his early first three symphonies (written between 1932-3) with ambivalent feelings. He initially contemplated destroying them, but thankfully decided not to because it would require renumbering all his later ones. After revising the first, Lloyd was inspired by its formal structure, a single movement based on the variation principle, to model his last symphony after the first one.
After over twenty years of neglect, Lloyd's music was rediscovered by the public at large after a 1977 BBC broadcast performance of his Symphony No.8. The composer tonal postromanticism, which was deemed a regressive by the English musical establishment, was appreciated by the public. In addition to the BBC, Lloyd found a steadfast champion in the form of the Albany (New York) Symphony Orchestra, which played his music and commissioned more, and in the Albany Record Company, one of America's more enterprising high-quality compact disc labels. This symphony was both commissioned by that orchestra and recorded and released by that label.
The first section is structured as a theme and variations. It begins with a wistful motive on violins, which is the root of a lyrical and ambiguous main theme shared between strings and woodwinds. After a virtuosic clarinet solo transition, the instruments introduces a lyrical and cantabile second theme, with murmuring strings and harp accompaniment. This graceful melody is passed to flute and violins, continually varied and imbued with new orchestral colouring. The main theme is briefly recapitulated in a varied way. The first variation is pastoral in nature, with florid ornamentation of woodwinds. The of colourful orchestration. After a brief climax, the third variation opens with dissonant chords, followed by a funereal transformation of the main theme. The final variation is festive and animated, with prominent use of tambourine, xylophone and marimba leading to a vigorous climax. A brief pause leads to the next part.
The second section is an adagio in form of an arch. It opens with reminiscences of the second theme from the previous part, which unfolds into a deeply lyrical way between low and upper strings. Follows a serene passage dominated by strings, the music becoming more expressive and emotional. A contrasting, more melancholic passage leads us to a passionate and sustained climax. The main theme of the previous part returns in a dramatic and dissonant conclusion to this climax. After a diminuendo, the adagio ends with a serene and evocative coda, before the finale suddenly springs forth.
The third section is an allegro in a modified sonata form. It begins with reminiscences of the rhythmic opening motive of the symphony, contrasted by gentle melodic phrases. Follows an intricate fugato development of the motive. A march-like idea is also introduced by the brass, which is soon developed in another impetuous fugato, growing in a crescendo to an imperious and agitated climax. The scoring is highly imaginative, bringing the extensive percussion into play. A contrasting and florid transition leads to a varied recapitulation of the themes, culminating in a contrapuntal climax in which the material is cleverly combined. Another seismic conclusion to rival that of its predecessor is shrewdly avoided, and a quiet lento coda is substituted, its texture coloured by the unearthly sounds of celesta and harp.
Picture: Three paintings by Greek painter Hero Kanakakis.
Musical analysis partially written by myself. Sources: tinyurl.com/26sy7ec7 and tinyurl.com/2af9zwup
Unfortunately, the score isn't freely available.










![Roaring Rotterdam for Orchestra - Joep Franssens
Netherlands Radio Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Gerd Albrecht.
I - Tempo I: Sostenuto, ma ritmico (♪ = 168) - Tempo II (♪ = 138) - (♪ = 168) - (♪ = 138) - Sempre come un corale (𝅘𝅥 = 84) - Appasionato maestoso (𝅘𝅥 = 69) - Tempo II (♪ = 138) 0:00
Franssenss Roaring Rotterdam was composed on 1997, being commissioned by the [Netherlands] Radio Philharmonic Orchestra (Radio Filharmonisch Orkest), with financial support from the Fonds voor de Scheppende Toonkunst, a Dutch foundation funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science in order promote the creation of new compositions in the field of classical music and jazz. It was premiered on November 17 of 1997, as the opener of a concert series titled Roaring Rotterdam, from which the title is derived. A version for 4 pianos was realized on 1997, being later revised on 2016.
After completing his musical studies with Louis Andriessen and Klaas de Vries, Franssens became inspired by Ligeti’s micropolyphony and the phase-shifting technique of Steve Reich. The relationship with Ligeti’s music becomes clear in works written in the eighties such as Echo’s and Phasing. The influence of Reich can already be heard in Between the Beats, an early piece for two pianos. During the nineties, Franssens’ sound became more open and more optimistic in tone. Because of the melodious, generous and emotional character of his music, he encountered growing resistance within the Dutch music scene. Contrarily he received growing acclaim by a wider audience. His first CD with Echo’s, Phasing and Sanctus was a hit.
The work with a series of ostinato figures introduced by the string basses of the orchestra, clearly inspired by the opening chorus of Bachs St. John Passion. The music gradually grows in a long crescendo, reaching two powerful and expressive climaxes. Other influences of the piece are Smetana’s The Moldau and the opening of Wagner’s Das Rheingold, the pop group Yes and more generally American minimalism. The meandering river of sound leads to a fortissimo chorale, coming to a halt on a lengthy bed of sound filled with octaves and fifths. The language seems at first glance clearly to belong to postmodernism, though in one way or another, the deeply serious tone of this piece is at odds with the anything goes attitude. What is more, it seems anything but fragmentary, given that all the discrete elements of the piece combine towards the end of the piece and culminate in an ineluctable granite-like chorale, a triumph of harmonic and rhythmic simplicity and unambiguousness.
Picture: Photograph of a lanscape in Rotterdam (2016) by David Broetz.
Musical analysis mostly written by myself. Sources: https://tinyurl.com/2brun3zn and https://tinyurl.com/26o828xn
To check the score: https://tinyurl.com/29w5wtcg Roaring Rotterdam for Orchestra - Joep Franssens](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ssO3Ss-Kj7w/mqdefault.jpg)