Uploaded October 2022 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Today on Legalese we have my fall Supreme Court Roundup. Of the cases the Supreme Court has agreed to hear this upcoming term I have focused on 5 which I believe have a high likelihood of becoming landmark cases in constitutional law jurisprudence. Including on case dealing with the State Legislature Doctrine, based on Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the Constitution. As well as 2 commerce clause cases, one dealing with the Indian Commerce Clause and another dealing with the dormant commerce clause as well as anti-commandeering doctrine under the tenth amendment. Finally we have 2 cases regarding Section 230, the statute often referred to as the Internet's first amendment.
Moore v Harper – independent state legislature doctrine
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/moore-v-harper
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/moore-v-harper-2
Haaland v Brackeen – Indian Commerce Clause case
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/haaland-v-brackeen
National Pork Producers Council v. Ross –Dormant Commerce Clause
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/national-pork-producers-council-v-ross
Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh – Section 230
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/twitter-inc-v-taamneh
Gonzalez v. Google LLC – section 230
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/gonzalez-v-google-llc
Follow & Support
Legalese Home Page - legaleseshow.com
Rumble - rumble.com/legalese
Substack - constitutionallaw.substack.com
Odysee - odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube - youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23
Anchor - https://anchor.fm/legaleseshow
To contact me for anything from topic requests, suggestions, feedback, to join as a subscriber to the Legalese newsletter or to support the show with a one-time donation or monthly membership through Locals/Patreon/PayPal/Venmo & more you can find all that in the "Links and Contacts" area of my homepage legaleseshow.com
Legalese is a podcast that discusses all things constitutional law as well as current events in politics and other areas of law.
Today on Legalese we have my fall Supreme Court Roundup. Of the cases the Supreme Court has agreed to hear this upcoming term I have focused on 5 which I believe have a high likelihood of becoming landmark cases in constitutional law jurisprudence. Including on case dealing with the State Legislature Doctrine, based on Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the Constitution. As well as 2 commerce clause cases, one dealing with the Indian Commerce Clause and another dealing with the dormant commerce clause as well as anti-commandeering doctrine under the tenth amendment. Finally we have 2 cases regarding Section 230, the statute often referred to as the Internet's first amendment.
Moore v Harper – independent state legislature doctrine
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/moore-v-harper
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/moore-v-harper-2
Haaland v Brackeen – Indian Commerce Clause case
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/haaland-v-brackeen
National Pork Producers Council v. Ross –Dormant Commerce Clause
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/national-pork-producers-council-v-ross
Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh – Section 230
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/twitter-inc-v-taamneh
Gonzalez v. Google LLC – section 230
scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/gonzalez-v-google-llc
Follow & Support
Legalese Home Page - legaleseshow.com
Rumble - rumble.com/legalese
Substack - constitutionallaw.substack.com
Odysee - odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube - youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23
Anchor - https://anchor.fm/legaleseshow
To contact me for anything from topic requests, suggestions, feedback, to join as a subscriber to the Legalese newsletter or to support the show with a one-time donation or monthly membership through Locals/Patreon/PayPal/Venmo & more you can find all that in the "Links and Contacts" area of my homepage legaleseshow.com
Legalese is a podcast that discusses all things constitutional law as well as current events in politics and other areas of law.







![Stromberg v California [Remaster]
This video is a remastered re-release of a very old episode I did on the case of Stromberg v California (1931)... This video was the very first in my series of Today In Supreme Court History...
I noticed this video had started generating a bunch of new views the past few days, and I noticed, like many of my old episodes, the sound quality was absolutely terrible, So this is not a new video, I just did some post-product on work on the original audio track and got it sounding MUCH better than the original episode.
This was a pivotal case because it was the very first time the Supreme Court incorporated the First Amendment protection of free expression on a State, rather than Federal level in 14th amendment jurisprudence based on substantive due process.
Enjoy!
►00:00 Introduction
►05:13 Stromberg v California Case Brief
Follow & Support
Rumble.com/legalese
locals.com/legalese
categoricalimperatives.substack.com
odysee.com/@Legalese
anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23
Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us Stromberg v California [Remaster]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Zo16BxtS_cU/mqdefault.jpg)


