Uploaded August 2021 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Episode #59
Today we continue with the latest video for my ongoing series "Today In Supreme Court History" with the second installment in a three part series I am doing on the foundational Constitutional law case of McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819)
A case which is considered by some of our most prominent lawyers, jurists & scholars to be the most important case in the corpus of constitutional law. People like Rob Natelson, Randy Barnett, Josh Blackman, David Schwartz. As well as not so prominent constitutional scholars like me. I endorse this view of this case.
Episode One: Was a case brief on the with the historical and legal background relevant to the case.
Episode Two: We will be examining the role the Necessary & Proper Clause plays in this case, as well as a deep dive into the Original Public Meaning of the Necessary & Proper Clause
Part Three: Will be the legacy of McCulloch right up to today & why it is that the bad reputation this case has for constitutional conservatives who see McCulloch as the source of nearly unlimited federal power under the United States,. We will discuss how and why that reputation is largely unfair and inaccurate.
This episode covers::
►00:00 Introduction
►01:00 Textual Analysis of "Necessary" and "Proper"
►05:10 Original Meaning Of The Clause & The Three Great Purposes
►10:30 Interpretation of Necessary & Proper In McCulloch v Maryland
►23:27 Conclusion On The Original Meaning of Necessary and Proper
Episode on Legal Tender Cases (1871) - youtu.be/tQYaftCQJ3c
Court Opinion In McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819) - supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/17/316
Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:
LBRY - lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee - odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube - youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23
Bitchute - bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives
Substack - categoricalimperatives.substack.com
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder
Twitter - twitter.com/LockeanLiberal
How to support the channel:
Patreon: patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen Producer
PayPal.Me - paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
All PayPal Donation Options - paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USD
Venmo Donations - venmo.com/LockeanLiberal
Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made
E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com
Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.
Episode #59
Today we continue with the latest video for my ongoing series "Today In Supreme Court History" with the second installment in a three part series I am doing on the foundational Constitutional law case of McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819)
A case which is considered by some of our most prominent lawyers, jurists & scholars to be the most important case in the corpus of constitutional law. People like Rob Natelson, Randy Barnett, Josh Blackman, David Schwartz. As well as not so prominent constitutional scholars like me. I endorse this view of this case.
Episode One: Was a case brief on the with the historical and legal background relevant to the case.
Episode Two: We will be examining the role the Necessary & Proper Clause plays in this case, as well as a deep dive into the Original Public Meaning of the Necessary & Proper Clause
Part Three: Will be the legacy of McCulloch right up to today & why it is that the bad reputation this case has for constitutional conservatives who see McCulloch as the source of nearly unlimited federal power under the United States,. We will discuss how and why that reputation is largely unfair and inaccurate.
This episode covers::
►00:00 Introduction
►01:00 Textual Analysis of "Necessary" and "Proper"
►05:10 Original Meaning Of The Clause & The Three Great Purposes
►10:30 Interpretation of Necessary & Proper In McCulloch v Maryland
►23:27 Conclusion On The Original Meaning of Necessary and Proper
Episode on Legal Tender Cases (1871) - youtu.be/tQYaftCQJ3c
Court Opinion In McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819) - supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/17/316
Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:
LBRY - lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Odysee - odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a
Youtube - youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23
Bitchute - bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives
Substack - categoricalimperatives.substack.com
Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler
Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder
Twitter - twitter.com/LockeanLiberal
How to support the channel:
Patreon: patreon.com/categoricalimperatives
Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen Producer
PayPal.Me - paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ
All PayPal Donation Options - paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USD
Venmo Donations - venmo.com/LockeanLiberal
Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made
E-mail the Show: CategoricalImperatives@gmx.com
Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

![Stromberg v California [Remaster]
This video is a remastered re-release of a very old episode I did on the case of Stromberg v California (1931)... This video was the very first in my series of Today In Supreme Court History...
I noticed this video had started generating a bunch of new views the past few days, and I noticed, like many of my old episodes, the sound quality was absolutely terrible, So this is not a new video, I just did some post-product on work on the original audio track and got it sounding MUCH better than the original episode.
This was a pivotal case because it was the very first time the Supreme Court incorporated the First Amendment protection of free expression on a State, rather than Federal level in 14th amendment jurisprudence based on substantive due process.
Enjoy!
►00:00 Introduction
►05:13 Stromberg v California Case Brief
Follow & Support
Rumble.com/legalese
locals.com/legalese
categoricalimperatives.substack.com
odysee.com/@Legalese
anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23
Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us Stromberg v California [Remaster]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Zo16BxtS_cU/mqdefault.jpg)








