Uploaded February 2024 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Episode #68
Today on Legalese we are talking about the death of the Chevron Doctrine. On January 17th, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Relentless Inc. v Department Of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo.
These two cases are asking whether or not the Court should overrule the Chevron Doctrine, which holds a court should defer to the judgement of an administrative agency in their interpretation of a statute if the statute is ambiguous or if Congress has been silent on the propriety of a particular policy decision.
We discuss the key points and most insightful sections of these oral arguments to provide a comprehensive understanding of the information that will be crucial to know for anyone who wants to truly understand these cases. We also briefly discuss some of the most likely potential outcomes in this case.
Show Notes Page For This Episode - constitutionallaw.substack.com/p/show-notes-chevron-is-dead-long-live
Follow & Support
Subscribe To Legalese Newsletter - legaleseshow.com
Legalese Homepage - legalesepodcast.com
“Constitutional Sleight Of Hand: An explicit history of implied powers” Now Available on Amazon - amazon.com/dp/B0BN93R9QX
Contact Me - Bob@legaleseshow.com
Legalese is a podcast that discusses all things constitutional law as well as current events in politics and other areas of law.
Episode #68
Today on Legalese we are talking about the death of the Chevron Doctrine. On January 17th, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Relentless Inc. v Department Of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo.
These two cases are asking whether or not the Court should overrule the Chevron Doctrine, which holds a court should defer to the judgement of an administrative agency in their interpretation of a statute if the statute is ambiguous or if Congress has been silent on the propriety of a particular policy decision.
We discuss the key points and most insightful sections of these oral arguments to provide a comprehensive understanding of the information that will be crucial to know for anyone who wants to truly understand these cases. We also briefly discuss some of the most likely potential outcomes in this case.
Show Notes Page For This Episode - constitutionallaw.substack.com/p/show-notes-chevron-is-dead-long-live
Follow & Support
Subscribe To Legalese Newsletter - legaleseshow.com
Legalese Homepage - legalesepodcast.com
“Constitutional Sleight Of Hand: An explicit history of implied powers” Now Available on Amazon - amazon.com/dp/B0BN93R9QX
Contact Me - Bob@legaleseshow.com
Legalese is a podcast that discusses all things constitutional law as well as current events in politics and other areas of law.
![Stromberg v California [Remaster]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Zo16BxtS_cU/mqdefault.jpg "Stromberg v California [Remaster]
This video is a remastered re-release of a very old episode I did on the case of Stromberg v California (1931)... This video was the very first in my series of Today In Supreme Court History...
I noticed this video had started generating a bunch of new views the past few days, and I noticed, like many of my old episodes, the sound quality was absolutely terrible, So this is not a new video, I just did some post-product on work on the original audio track and got it sounding MUCH better than the original episode.
This was a pivotal case because it was the very first time the Supreme Court incorporated the First Amendment protection of free expression on a State, rather than Federal level in 14th amendment jurisprudence based on substantive due process.
Enjoy!
►00:00 Introduction
►05:13 Stromberg v California Case Brief
Follow & Support
Rumble.com/legalese
locals.com/legalese
categoricalimperatives.substack.com
odysee.com/@Legalese
anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives
youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23
Contact the show: Legalese@gmx.us")
