Should You Always Follow the Evidence? (Evidentialism Explained) @lizjackson111
Should You Always Follow the Evidence? (Evidentialism Explained)  @lizjackson111
Uploaded November 2020 | Updated September 2026, 19 hours ago
This video is about a theory in epistemology called evidentialism. Evidentialism is the view that what we should believe is determined only by our evidence. We then discuss three recently challenges to evidentialism: epistemic partiality, moral encroachment, and beneficial beliefs. We conclude by examining some ways that an evidentialist might respond to these challenges.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out my website: liz-jackson.com
For more on my research: liz-jackson.com/research
For popular-level interviews, podcasts, and blog posts I’ve done: liz-jackson.com/public-philosophy

Follow me on social media:
Twitter: twitter.com/lizjackson111
Instagram: @lizjackson111
Facebook: facebook.com/lizjackson111
Should You Always Follow the Evidence? (Evidentialism Explained)Is Faith Rational? (Your Biggest Questions Answered)Would God Existing Be Good or Bad?Why Pretending Makes You SmarterCan Other People Change What You Know?Most Arguments Are Bad (Here’s Why)Philosophy Explained (Questions Science Can’t Answer)This Sounds Like an Argument… But Is It?Can Something Be ‘True for You’?My First Book (What It’s About)Logic Explained (Super Simple)Is Low-Confidence Belief Rational?
PhiLIZophy |

Should You Always Follow the Evidence? (Evidentialism Explained)

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER