RDWorks Learning Lab 222 Beam combiners A new approach @SarbarMultimedia

Uploaded December 2021 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago

I looked at the performance of beam combiners more than 4 years ago and decided then that it was impossible to set them with any precision. I have managed for 6 years without one and at the last review, I power tested before and after to find a 5% power loss. I thought this was a heavy premium to pay for an unpredictable indication of where the beam would hit your work. Cloudray are most insistent that a beam combiner is the only way to provide a "red dot" for the lightweight head on the Russ Spec machine they have produced. I found myself with a dilemma......... agree to shipping a high spec high quality machine with a piece of known substandard kit or design a replacement that would do the job properly. I accepted the latter challenge and this video is an an analysis of the task to be performed and then testing the design that I created.

RDWorks Learning Lab 222 Beam combiners A new approach

RDWorks Learning Lab 208 Can I Remove the Focal Point

TangerineTiger 13 Lets Compare RF and Glass tubes

Fiber Laser Learning Lab 11 We are no longer Flying Blind

RDWorks Learning Lab 170 Lets Focus on Lenses Part 4 (first results)

RDWorks Learning Lab 226 Can my Beam Collimator Work

RDWorks Learning Lab 207 The Importance of Beam Intensity

RDWorks Learning Lab 163 Lenses Part 2 Lets Focus

RDWorks Learning Lab 181 Redsail clone upgraded head

$RDWorks Learning Lab 210 Lets Focus on Focus AGAIN The dictionary describes a focal point as that place where parallel rays of light passing through a lens are refracted to converge on a single point. That may apply to visible light for cameras and telescopes where light sources are uniform and lenses are high precision and usually multiples, but in the world of Chinese lasers things are a long way from that dictionary definition. The use of a single lens and then a choice of just two forms, plano convex and meniscus, is the first disadvantage. The simple spherical geometry of these lens forms will never achieve that dictionary perfection. The longer the focal length of the lens, the greater the imperfection. The single feature that ALL lasers beams posses is a non-uniform intensity profile. The perfect laser beam will conform to a Gaussian intensity distribution. ( a bell shape graph) where the central light intensity is many times greater than the outer regions of the beam. Combine the focussing weakness of spherical lens geometry with the non uniform intensity within the laser beam and we no longer have that idealized model of focus that we are all taught. We set the focal point for a lens to that distance where we create the smallest burn spot or the thinnest drawn line. This is not setting the LIGHT focal point but that point where the the light INTENSITY is sufficient to damage the material we are marking/cutting . I clearly demonstrate that the traditional model of focus is of very limited value in our weird world of lasers.$