Uploaded May 2021 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
The Russ theory of how lenses work for our laser machines took a major step forward a couple of sessions ago when I proved I could remove a lens's cutting capability by drilling a hole through the central axis where I theorized there was a high light intensity secondary focussing" leak" path projecting beyond the nominal focal point. I postulated that this projecting focal "spike" was the REAL reason why we can cut with a lens. I also demonstrated that the same degraded lens was still able to engrave perfectly. In this session I try to prove the opposite by removing the engraving capability yet leaving the cutting capability . I know it sounds totally bonkers but there is no other way to prove to doubters that there is something in my theory that requires serious consideration. Lenses have been around for more than 4000 years, thus statistically this must have been investigated before. .... but then again they didn't have lasers and YouTube in ancient Egypt.
The Russ theory of how lenses work for our laser machines took a major step forward a couple of sessions ago when I proved I could remove a lens's cutting capability by drilling a hole through the central axis where I theorized there was a high light intensity secondary focussing" leak" path projecting beyond the nominal focal point. I postulated that this projecting focal "spike" was the REAL reason why we can cut with a lens. I also demonstrated that the same degraded lens was still able to engrave perfectly. In this session I try to prove the opposite by removing the engraving capability yet leaving the cutting capability . I know it sounds totally bonkers but there is no other way to prove to doubters that there is something in my theory that requires serious consideration. Lenses have been around for more than 4000 years, thus statistically this must have been investigated before. .... but then again they didn't have lasers and YouTube in ancient Egypt.








