Uploaded May 2021 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This video is a response to a pragerU video titled "Is communism moral?"
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999Yt
E-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
The song in the outro was produced by 08 (who gave me no way to credit them), you can listen to the whole remix on my second channel: youtu.be/jZOrMsIOZh0
Sources:
PragerU’s video: youtube.com/watch?v=A9J4WLEnpaM3
PragerU funding: sourcewatch.org/index.php/PragerU
Viki1999 funding: patreon.com/viki1999
My video on the death toll of communism: youtube.com/watch?v=wflMmNTXqKk
Heinz Kessler quote: mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/50-years-on-i-built-the-berlin-146041
Transcript:
Hello everybody. I’ve not made a video like this in a while so some of you may now know this. Prager University aka PragerU is not a University. It’s a right wing youtube Channel which tries to seem more credible by falsely calling themselves a university. They are funded by conservative oil barons and anonymous donors.
Personally I disclose all of my donors at the end of each video, that’s what the outro is. But I am just some silly socialist not a prestigious….fake online university with a strong right wing bias. That bias by the way is the reason I am talking to you today. Because they make videos with conservative opinions in them, so I am making a video on their video.
The one we will watch today is titled “Is communism moral?” and initially I didn’t want to make a video on that. I thought a video purely about morals would be mostly opinion based and you can’t prove an opinion wrong. But leave it to pragerU to manage to make a video on a moral question and to make enough factual mistakes for me to make a video on it.
The video starts with Dennis Prager saying your actions matter more than your words and I think everyone can agree with that. If you say you are conservative but then you support fascist policies and feature white supremacist hosts then that behaviour clearly outweighs all Judeo-Christian values you claim to hold. Completely random example by the way no accusations here.
Dennis goes on saying that the same applies to governments. Their actious outweigh their words. As a communist I would say “Material reality outweighs ideological purity” which is just the same thing with more fancy words. Also of course the obvious example of this is America being pro-freedom and democracy and stuff while establishing fascist dictatorships all over south and central America.
Prager then explains capitalism. “The individual pursues success to the best of his abilities (that’s capitalism) versus everyone shares everything equally (that’s communism). “ And if you are a communist, or a capitalist, or know anything about either communism or capitalism you will notice that….well, these definitions have issues.
The main one being that they are straight up wrong. Capitalism is an economy in which businesses are privately owned. That’s it. Commonly we mean free market capitalism which has competitions so I guess that kind of matches this definition? Of course, this also shows a core problem with capitalism. For example my boss pursuing success means I have to work overtime or get fired.
Like, everyone pursuing happiness sounds great but practically that way people will stand in the way of each other’s pursuit. So a better definition would be that capitalism is a economic system based on ruthless competition instead of cooperation.
This definition of communism was probably found in a book from a library…. in a preschool. It’s that bad. There are different definitions on communism. The orthodox Marxist take is that it is a utopic society in which everything has been overproduced so much that there is a practically infinite amount of everything, making money, trading and even the concept of owning things a thing of the past.
That’s the OG Marxist answer, nowadays most people don’t mean this when they say “communism”. And most even think superabundance, which is the fancy word for having infinite amounts of everything, is not possible at all. There is certainly nobody wo has that society as a tangible political goal. Instead, people are socialists who want socialism, which then at some stage turns into this communism.
Because of leftism the socialists split around a hundred years ago, one faction continuing to call themselves socialist, and the other one adopting the name “communists”. So, in addition to the Marxist answer, communism can also mean a state or party which is run by communists. Some states that are commonly called communist are the Soviet Union and china.
This video is a response to a pragerU video titled "Is communism moral?"
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999Yt
E-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
The song in the outro was produced by 08 (who gave me no way to credit them), you can listen to the whole remix on my second channel: youtu.be/jZOrMsIOZh0
Sources:
PragerU’s video: youtube.com/watch?v=A9J4WLEnpaM3
PragerU funding: sourcewatch.org/index.php/PragerU
Viki1999 funding: patreon.com/viki1999
My video on the death toll of communism: youtube.com/watch?v=wflMmNTXqKk
Heinz Kessler quote: mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/50-years-on-i-built-the-berlin-146041
Transcript:
Hello everybody. I’ve not made a video like this in a while so some of you may now know this. Prager University aka PragerU is not a University. It’s a right wing youtube Channel which tries to seem more credible by falsely calling themselves a university. They are funded by conservative oil barons and anonymous donors.
Personally I disclose all of my donors at the end of each video, that’s what the outro is. But I am just some silly socialist not a prestigious….fake online university with a strong right wing bias. That bias by the way is the reason I am talking to you today. Because they make videos with conservative opinions in them, so I am making a video on their video.
The one we will watch today is titled “Is communism moral?” and initially I didn’t want to make a video on that. I thought a video purely about morals would be mostly opinion based and you can’t prove an opinion wrong. But leave it to pragerU to manage to make a video on a moral question and to make enough factual mistakes for me to make a video on it.
The video starts with Dennis Prager saying your actions matter more than your words and I think everyone can agree with that. If you say you are conservative but then you support fascist policies and feature white supremacist hosts then that behaviour clearly outweighs all Judeo-Christian values you claim to hold. Completely random example by the way no accusations here.
Dennis goes on saying that the same applies to governments. Their actious outweigh their words. As a communist I would say “Material reality outweighs ideological purity” which is just the same thing with more fancy words. Also of course the obvious example of this is America being pro-freedom and democracy and stuff while establishing fascist dictatorships all over south and central America.
Prager then explains capitalism. “The individual pursues success to the best of his abilities (that’s capitalism) versus everyone shares everything equally (that’s communism). “ And if you are a communist, or a capitalist, or know anything about either communism or capitalism you will notice that….well, these definitions have issues.
The main one being that they are straight up wrong. Capitalism is an economy in which businesses are privately owned. That’s it. Commonly we mean free market capitalism which has competitions so I guess that kind of matches this definition? Of course, this also shows a core problem with capitalism. For example my boss pursuing success means I have to work overtime or get fired.
Like, everyone pursuing happiness sounds great but practically that way people will stand in the way of each other’s pursuit. So a better definition would be that capitalism is a economic system based on ruthless competition instead of cooperation.
This definition of communism was probably found in a book from a library…. in a preschool. It’s that bad. There are different definitions on communism. The orthodox Marxist take is that it is a utopic society in which everything has been overproduced so much that there is a practically infinite amount of everything, making money, trading and even the concept of owning things a thing of the past.
That’s the OG Marxist answer, nowadays most people don’t mean this when they say “communism”. And most even think superabundance, which is the fancy word for having infinite amounts of everything, is not possible at all. There is certainly nobody wo has that society as a tangible political goal. Instead, people are socialists who want socialism, which then at some stage turns into this communism.
Because of leftism the socialists split around a hundred years ago, one faction continuing to call themselves socialist, and the other one adopting the name “communists”. So, in addition to the Marxist answer, communism can also mean a state or party which is run by communists. Some states that are commonly called communist are the Soviet Union and china.
![Watching a funny libertarian rant [Reply to Scotty M] (he has since deleted the vid. Read desc.)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ARcQxpojjxc/mqdefault.jpg "Watching a funny libertarian rant [Reply to Scotty M] (he has since deleted the vid. Read desc.)
PLEASE NOTE: He took down the video I am replying to without explanation, one possibility is that he was getting harassed by people from this video. I oppose that. I considered taking my video down. After all my channel is now close to 3 times the size of his channel (unlike when I uploaded this, at that time his channel was bigger) and I dont want to lead a hate mob against a smaller channel. But on the other hand I came to the conclusion that it is my right to reply to a video about him and the fact that his channel is small should not be a reason for me to remove my criticism. Because of this I held a YT community post to decide and right now its 75% in favor of keeping this video up. This is why this video still exists despite the fact that the video I am replying to does not.
This video is a reply to Libertarian views scotty Ms video about me. He is replying to my last video in which he appeared. While he is pretending to reply to me all he actually does is rant about random topics for 30 minutes. Some of his topics include trumps covid comments, the starving time in 1607, the history of india as well as many other topics which are not related to my video. For the sake of speed I disregarded some of his argument in favor of focusing on the more credible ones.
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999Yt
E-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
Links:
Scottys video: youtube.com/watch?v=Hmi4qB_eXkY
820 Million people Lack the food to live a healthy life: htthttps://news.un.org/en/story/2019/07/1042411
9 Million Starve each year: https://www.creditdonkey.com/world-hunger-statistics.html
9 Million Starve each year2: https://www.mercycorps.org/blog/quick-facts-global-hunger
Transcript:
Hello everybody, one of my last videos was this one, it became my best received video so far, finally breaking the record set by my first video, long story. Anyway in that one I made fun of some silly libertarians including this one. Among other things I said that he must be reasonable and open to change his mind if he put his ideology into his username. And in the comment section he totally proved me right by going on a long rant about, well, everything.
I then told him that if he intends to make a video about me he should watch a few other of my videos so he wouldn’t repeat the same 5 old lies. Stuff like how socialism did not kill 100 million, that markets aren’t that efficient and that they are responsible for about 15 million deaths each year. He totally took that advice, I am sure. And he then made a 30 minute response video. So that’s what we are doing today, we are looking at his response to my video.
His video is quite long and if I made a full response it would take about 5 hours since videos take about 10 times their own runtime to be debunked. Because of this I will be ignoring some of the more generic arguments and only talk about actual interesting points and things that are so radicicolous that I had to show them to you. So, without further ado let’s get into it, shall we?
He starts of by showing the first few seconds of my video. This is the only time he shows anything from me which is kind of odd for a response video. The rest is kind of an unhinged rant. And there is one thing you might notice, he seems to be confused about my pronouns. And I should have addressed that earlier. I use she/her pronouns and I am not a boy either. I am a woman and I have always been one. I know it’s hard to believe because of the voice but that’s actually just because of a gene defect which causes my body to produce too much testosterone which then changed my voice. I recognise the confusion but from now on you know.
Anyway, his video starts off with explaining that socialism and collectivism are synonyms. And he further explains that I was using the wrong definition of socialism in my video. He then shows us his definition of socialism. Okay so this says. ”Any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods”
While I said. “Socialism is worker or community control over the means of production, like a factory which democratically decides how to operate” the only difference I can see is that I didn’t explicitly mention the state. Because if someone considers the state an extension of the community then to them state control is community control. So he says I am making up my own definition while showing my definition on screen. Okay then.")
