My DEFINITIVE Response on Black Egypt (KueliMika, Mr. Imotep, TKM) @metatronyt

Metatron | My DEFINITIVE Response on Black Egypt (KueliMika, Mr. Imotep, TKM) @metatronyt | Uploaded March 2024 | Updated October 2024, 3 hours ago.
The debate has been opened.

Please check out my Patreon page if you wish to support my work and the spread of
objective, unapologetic truth.
patreon.com/themetatron

These are the links to the main videos featured on this presentation. Please be respectful and do not attack these creators.

KueliMika's work
youtube.com/watch?v=3QRpf7lD0uo&t=3766s
youtube.com/watch?v=vPb9afzHhCc&t=1403s
youtube.com/watch?v=I95eOF-Mkwk&t=1198s

Mr. Imotep's work
youtube.com/watch?v=0zTgUVo5wqM&t=214s

The Kings Monologue's work
youtube.com/watch?v=UZ6G7EGdkhA&t=119s
youtube.com/watch?v=NNckmQ6zs3U&t=6142s

Other channels
youtube.com/watch?v=Yn3jnjYIFNY&t=84s
youtube.com/watch?v=gXkOq6_eDPc&t=633s
youtube.com/watch?v=5m2ujZCgeuc&t=1s
youtube.com/watch?v=GN2y2KuCcJ0&t=311s
youtube.com/watch?v=ECeiW3VUcj8&t=8s

Links I promise on the video
My video on Nordic Romans
youtube.com/watch?v=wx90MPXeagw&t=786s
My video that apparently doesn't exist on me debunking White marble statues
youtube.com/watch?v=0IcS5xas08I

Links to the studies (please note that you have to add the https://www. part at the start of the link, as it seems that links to external websites are not seen well by the system.)

Studies on sensory pitch manipulation

researchgate.net/publication/367962828_Your_voice_pitch_speaks_volumes_about_you_How_voice_pitch_affects_mind_perception_of_the_speakers

researchgate.net/publication/228706007_A_comparative_evaluation_of_pitch_modification_techniques

Study from the university of Florence on the pigments darkening from Tomb of Seti I

net/publication/317061204_THE_TOMB_OF_SETI_I_KV17_IN_THE_FLORENCE_EGYPTIAN_MUSEUM_INTEGRATED_NON-INVASIVE_METHODS_FOR_DOCUMENTATION_MATERIAL_HISTORY_AND_DIAGNOSTICS

Link to this Matilda's blog for you to check my statements about it

mathildasanthropologyblog.wordpress.com/2009/12/03/ancient-descriptions-of-ancient-egyptians

Section on Nawqada culture: references

(cfr. Brace&Alii, Clines and clusters versus “Race:” a test in ancient Egypt and the case of a death on the Nile, American Journal of Phisci Anthropology 36,

(cfr. Patricia Smith, Egypt and the Levant: Interrelations from the 4th through the Early 3rd Millennium BC bioanthropology.huji.ac.il/pdf/13.pdf)

( cfr. A. Mączyńska, “Shaky foundation of the Egyptian Civilization: Response article to Of culture wars and the clash of civilizations in Prehistoric Egyptan epistemological analysis by E. Christiana Köhler, Vienna”, in Egypt and the Levant, Vol. 30 (2020), pp. 95-100)

Section on Dynamics of colour perception: references

this link will be added later, as I have to find it in my computer.

On the language section: references

researchgate.net/publication/376981115_Semito-Hamitic_or_Afro-Asiatic_consonantism_and_lexicon_Episodes_of_a_comparative_research_II_The_old_school_of_Egypto-Semitic_Part_2_Post-war_phase

In language colours are used for 2 purposes mostly: description and categorization. There is a linguistic phenomenon called type modification and it's extremely common in most languages. I'll leave a link in the description to an abstract “Categorical Perception” and Linguistic Categorization of Color that introduces this concept.
To you, what colour is the yolk of an egg. (from The dialectal names for ‘yolk’ collected in the 1980s for Atlas Linguarum Europae).
There is variation in this answer, depending on the language some say yellow, red, shades of brown.

Some ancients described honey as being green, the sea as wine coloured, and this is diachronic in nature, which means that it changes through time. But even you, Kings Monologue a modern English speaker say white wine and you are not being descriptive when you do so, since wine is arguably golden yellow. Your comments on the term olive skin make it sound like to you a glass of white wine should look like the glass on the left of the screen.

I have a lot of examples in Old Norse, how the sun and high quality gold was described as red, but the pertinent one is how they sometimes used blue to describe things that we see Black. Like ravens and before you say "structural coloration" they describe people from Africa as blue as well.

That's not because the Norse saw your people actually blue but because in that culture blue contains a undermeaning of exotic and mysterious.

We do this when we classify things rather than describe them.
So calling a hue of human skin olive to categorize it, even if said people do not look like actual olives is absolutely normal and it's silly to make fun of it.

#metatron #blackegypt #response

DELUSIONAL! Destroying The Neanderthal Apex Predator Theory

Medieval Swords Were Only For Stabbing, The Hussars Were Idiots, Swords Were Only Meant To Stun

Netflix Documentary Cleopatra Trailer: REACTION

Terryology is A JOKE! I Proved Terrence Howard WRONG

S3X In Ancient Greece? Weird Historys Video Is HORRIBLE

$Was Nazism Right Wing or Left Wing? An Answer From History Join this channel to get access to more old school Metatron videos the algorithm wouldnt prioritize! Support freedom and get your preferred content!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIjGKyrdT4Gja0VLO40RlOw/join Check out my new interactive adventure! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeHThdbAgJA https://www.patreon.com/themetatron 1 - Prysm of Evaluation This question is a form of ahistorical syllogism: Youll see several people giving you an answer today in the comments down below. People will not watch this video and they will type either obviously it was right wing or of course it was left wing. Now there are in my opinion, two major problems here. 1 - They use the American left right dichotomy or political spectrum and they focefully apply it to historical European political regimes an ideologies, hence the first problem is spacial or geographic/cultural in nature. 2 - They use 21st century political spectra and juxtapose them over 20th politics. Thus the second problem is temporal. The incongruence between modern and 20th-century political definitions within the right-left dichotomy is a complex phenomenon rooted in evolving socio-economic shifting of global dynamics. This discrepancy necessitates a nuanced analysis of the factors contributing to this conceptual divergence. Within these dynamics the correct and coherent answer is going to be fractal as there is no clean definition overlap. History is a multidimentional phenomenom. Expecting therefore 21st century American political ideas to overlap neatly and perfectly with 20th century European political factions in order to come out with an aswer is a flawed analytical method. So the people who are categorically stating it was left wing or it was right wing are not answering to present a comprehensive analysis of policies, ideologies, historal actions, military conduct, economic, religious and social positions pushed by said regimes, they are just insulting the other side. They are free to do it, but just so we are clear as to what that is. Make no mistake, Nazi is a slur and so people want to use it to identify and describe their political opponents. Thats why it works I will argue as a conduit to the detriment of the way public opinion perceives the other side. In this framework, fascism and Hitler currently have negative valence — they are derogatory, not complimentary. With that established the following coarsely represents the train of thought leading to this usage. Its a simple process, clearly this doesnt require any deep empirical analysis grounded in historical political science. Thats why the media uses this word constantly. You see once you take that leap then the historical vision will be irreversibly tainted. The question is flawed to begin with because its basis, namely the expectations and the prism of evaluation are not in alignment. This has rendered the traditional unidimensional political spectrum increasingly inadequate for capturing the complexity of 20th century political parties. This reflects the evolution in political taxonomy. First we need to ensure objectivity to our analysis. Focus on: attitudes toward private property, individual freedom, and wealth redistribution if needed even implementing a mathematical apparatus. Also we should explore the political alligiances and oppositions within the historical frame to correctly define these political regimes. Lets do that. Welcome to our qualitative comparative analysis. 2 - Inconsistent Nomenclature Some people will use nomenclature as a gotcha moment to place the Nazis within the political spectrum. In other words Nazim stands for National Socialism, so they were socialist, hence left wing. Nomenclature alone cannot be used as the basis for classification. Its too shallow and unscientific as a parametre. Let me prove it to you. If the name chosen by the party is the basis of the argument, then is the Communist Party in China republican in the American sense? I mean its the Peoples Republic of China. Similarly, is the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (aka North Korea) democratic? In the United States, simple liberalism often means social liberalism and a liberal is a left winger, but in Europe simple liberalism often means classical liberalism which can be a centre right position, particularly for those right-wing populist movements that may advocate for protectionist economic policies traditionally associated with the left in recent US history, while embracing cultural and social conservatism. Moreover since we are talking about how they named themselves, then note that Hitler himself enied that Nazism was either left-wing or right-wing: instead, they officially portrayed Nazism as a syncretic movement. Yeah lets ditch the name argument shall we. #history #ww2 #mythbusting$

The Truth About Sodom And Gomorrah Like You Have Never Seen Before