Uploaded March 2025 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 42,700 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 988 casebooks ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Lenhart v. Desmond
Wyoming Supreme Court
705 P.2d 338 (1985)
If someone signs a deed and sets it where the recipient has access to it, then it seems like the grantor has deeded the property to the recipient.
But as the court explained in Lenhart versus Desmond, that's not necessarily so. In nineteen seventy four, Edward Desmond executed a warranty deed to his daughter Elizabeth Lenhart and put it in a safe deposit box. Desmond explained that because he was in his eighties, he executed the deed, intending for her to have the house after he died.
To accomplish that, Desmond completed a signature card giving Lenhart access to the box.
Nine years later, Desmond was injured in a car crash and hospitalized.
Lenhart assisted him and retrieved insurance documents from the safe deposit box. Desmond later discovered that the deed, which had been in the box before the accident, was missing.
Three months later, Lenhart recorded the deed. When Desmond requested that she deed the property back to him, she refused, fearing he'd mortgage the property and spend his money on booze.
Desmond sued his daughter, seeking a declaration that the deed was invalid.
At trial, Desmond testified that he intended that the residence should pass to Lenhart when he died, but not before then. Lenhart testified that Desmond physically handed her the deed. The trial court found for Desmond and declared the deed invalid.
Lenhart appealed to the Wyoming Supreme Court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: hquimbee.com/cases/lenhart-v-desmond
The Quimbee App features over 42,700 case briefs keyed to 988 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: quimbee.com/cases/lenhart-v-desmond
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► facebook.com/quimbeedotcom
Twitter ► twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 42,700 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 988 casebooks ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Lenhart v. Desmond
Wyoming Supreme Court
705 P.2d 338 (1985)
If someone signs a deed and sets it where the recipient has access to it, then it seems like the grantor has deeded the property to the recipient.
But as the court explained in Lenhart versus Desmond, that's not necessarily so. In nineteen seventy four, Edward Desmond executed a warranty deed to his daughter Elizabeth Lenhart and put it in a safe deposit box. Desmond explained that because he was in his eighties, he executed the deed, intending for her to have the house after he died.
To accomplish that, Desmond completed a signature card giving Lenhart access to the box.
Nine years later, Desmond was injured in a car crash and hospitalized.
Lenhart assisted him and retrieved insurance documents from the safe deposit box. Desmond later discovered that the deed, which had been in the box before the accident, was missing.
Three months later, Lenhart recorded the deed. When Desmond requested that she deed the property back to him, she refused, fearing he'd mortgage the property and spend his money on booze.
Desmond sued his daughter, seeking a declaration that the deed was invalid.
At trial, Desmond testified that he intended that the residence should pass to Lenhart when he died, but not before then. Lenhart testified that Desmond physically handed her the deed. The trial court found for Desmond and declared the deed invalid.
Lenhart appealed to the Wyoming Supreme Court.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: hquimbee.com/cases/lenhart-v-desmond
The Quimbee App features over 42,700 case briefs keyed to 988 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: quimbee.com/cases/lenhart-v-desmond
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► facebook.com/quimbeedotcom
Twitter ► twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries





![United States v Dionisio Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 42,700 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 988 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
United States v. Dionisio | 410 U.S. 1, 93 S.Ct. 764, 35 L.Ed.2d 67 (1973)
Grand jury subpoenas can be used to secure testimony or documents. In United States versus Dionicio, the supreme court considered whether a grand jury subpoena could also be used to obtain other physical evidence.
A federal grand jury investigating unlawful gambling received wiretap voice recordings in evidence. The grand jury subpoenaed several people, including Antonio Dionisio, seeking to obtain recorded voice samples to compare with the recordings in evidence.
Amendment rights. The district court granted the governments petition to compel DOnicios compliance with the subpoena. After DAnnico still refused, he was found in contempt. The seventh circuit reversed, holding that the government had to make a preliminary showing of reasonableness before DAnnico could be compelled to provide physical evidence.
The United States Supreme Court granted cert.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: [insert link of case brief on Quimbee]
The Quimbee App features over 42,700 case briefs keyed to 988 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: [insert the link of the case brief on Quimbee]
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries United States v Dionisio Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q3nR-t8qubE/mqdefault.jpg)




