Is the Kalam Cosmological Argument Circular and Unscientific? @firstcauseargument
Is the Kalam Cosmological Argument Circular and Unscientific?  @firstcauseargument
Uploaded March 2014 | Updated September 2026, 3 days ago
An often-cited objection (by "Counter Apologist" - a college student) against the Kalam Cosmological Argument is answered by William Lane Craig. Does the Kalam Cosmological Argument engage in circular reasoning? Is it unscientific? How does the A Theory and B Theory of Time relate to the KCA? Is the cause before or after the effect in the KCA? Also, should we approach science as an atheistic naturalist in our presuppositions?
Is the Kalam Cosmological Argument Circular and Unscientific?The Bouncing Universe Fails (Stephen M. Barr, PhD)Dan Barker on Kalam Cosmological Argument - William Lane Craig, PhDKai Nielsen on Nothing Doing SomethingDoes Kalam Equivocate on the Phrase Begins to Exist? - Kalam Cosmological ArgumentThe Cosmos Just Is?: Carl Sagan vs William Lane CraigSequential Infinity in the Trinity? - William Lane Craig, PhDThe Law of Causality and Miracles - John Lennox, PhDThe Cosmos: Carl Sagan and Neil deGrasse Tyson - William Lane Craig, PhDScientific Evidence for the Kalam Cosmological ArgumentKalam Cosmological Argument (Christian Apologetics) - Doug PotterDoes Quantum Physics Provide an Exception to Premise 1 of the Kalam Cosmological Argument?
firstcauseargument |

Is the Kalam Cosmological Argument Circular and Unscientific?

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER