Is Believing in God Basic?  pt.1 Plantingas Reformed Epistemology @MattMcCormick1781
Is Believing in God Basic?  pt.1 Plantingas Reformed Epistemology  @MattMcCormick1781
Uploaded April 2014 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
The first of three lectures from Prof. Matt McCormick, Philosophy, California State University, Sacramento, about Plantinga's Reformed Epistemology analysis of God beliefs. Plantinga argues that a belief in God is basic, axiomatic, and defeasible. It doesn't need to be justified by appeal to argument. Parts 2 and 3 will consider the background to this view and objections.
Is Believing in God Basic?  pt.1 Plantingas Reformed EpistemologyCraig on Faith and DoubtPhilosophy of Religion Course Structure, McCormick, CSUSIntro to the Problem of EvilScience and ReligionKahnemans Thinking, Fast and Slow, chapters 19-24,  pt. 2Inductive Logic 2, Introduction to Decision Theory, Peterson, chap. 2Dehaene and Naccache Global Workspace Theory, pt. 2Taking an Online CourseDead as a Doornail:  Can Near Death or Out of Body Experiences Prove the Existence of an Afterlife?Kahnemans Thinking, Fast and Slow, chapters 37-38William Paleys Design Argument for God: Watches, Evolution, and The Gap
Matt McCormick, Professor in Philosophy, CSUS |

Is Believing in God Basic? pt.1 Plantinga's Reformed Epistemology

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER