Uploaded June 2015 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Once again we have the meteorological community using a term in unison to describe a ‘storm system’ that isn’t at all what they say it is. There’s nothing any different about this manufactured system than any manufactured system we see every day, yet ‘somehow’ it’s as if every TV Meteorologist is reading off of the same script. Clearly it would be educational to investigate where these terms for any given manufactured system originate.
So, once again it begs the question “what are these meteorologists looking at?” Do they only look at the same sanitized four-frame loops they feed the public? Do they ever actually watch these systems suddenly and consistently materialize out of nowhere? If so – what possible “meteorological” explanation could they be giving themselves that is even remotely plausible?
Certainly, there is none. There is no plausible “natural” explanation for what we look at every day, and it’s just that simple. No meteorologist or climate scientist (with a name, face, and reputation to stake on his answer) is offering any either.
I’d say that reality speaks for itself.
WW101
weatherwar101.com
No Natural Weather: Introduction to Geoengineering 101
tinyurl.com/NNW-101
Please support this continuing independent work. (PayPal)
tinyurl.com/WW101-PP
---
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
Once again we have the meteorological community using a term in unison to describe a ‘storm system’ that isn’t at all what they say it is. There’s nothing any different about this manufactured system than any manufactured system we see every day, yet ‘somehow’ it’s as if every TV Meteorologist is reading off of the same script. Clearly it would be educational to investigate where these terms for any given manufactured system originate.
So, once again it begs the question “what are these meteorologists looking at?” Do they only look at the same sanitized four-frame loops they feed the public? Do they ever actually watch these systems suddenly and consistently materialize out of nowhere? If so – what possible “meteorological” explanation could they be giving themselves that is even remotely plausible?
Certainly, there is none. There is no plausible “natural” explanation for what we look at every day, and it’s just that simple. No meteorologist or climate scientist (with a name, face, and reputation to stake on his answer) is offering any either.
I’d say that reality speaks for itself.
WW101
weatherwar101.com
No Natural Weather: Introduction to Geoengineering 101
tinyurl.com/NNW-101
Please support this continuing independent work. (PayPal)
tinyurl.com/WW101-PP
---
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
