Uploaded February 2022 | Updated September 2026, 13 hours ago
Many health influencers on the Internet extrapolate from laboratory studies to health and medical recommendations. This is wrong and is not likely to produce benefit and may cause harm (PMID 29394327).
Andrew Huberman, now the most prominent podcaster and health influencer online, does this often. And although he may be more persuasive, he does not do it any better than the other influencers.
Take vitamin D. In a recent advertisement to promote the products of his affiliates, Huberman claimed that vitamin D is necessary to many biological functions (true) and that many people do not get enough. He then asserts that “many, many people” need to be supplementing with vitamin D.
This is not based on any evidence. In fact the U.S. Preventive Task Force, an evidence synthesis panel, recommends against even screening for vitamin D, noting that current evidence suggests that vitamin D does not provide benefit for most major outcomes (PMID 33847711).
The USPTF recommendations are based on the latest evidence. Extrapolating from mechanisms to shill for a supplement that is your affiliate is not a reliable way to communicate evidence or recommendations.
If you want to know whether you should supplement with vitamin D, talk with you doctor. Vitamin D is a powerful biologically active compounds. Don’t make your decisions based on unreliable marketing from a podcast.
Donate by clicking here: thedietwars.com/support-me
Many health influencers on the Internet extrapolate from laboratory studies to health and medical recommendations. This is wrong and is not likely to produce benefit and may cause harm (PMID 29394327).
Andrew Huberman, now the most prominent podcaster and health influencer online, does this often. And although he may be more persuasive, he does not do it any better than the other influencers.
Take vitamin D. In a recent advertisement to promote the products of his affiliates, Huberman claimed that vitamin D is necessary to many biological functions (true) and that many people do not get enough. He then asserts that “many, many people” need to be supplementing with vitamin D.
This is not based on any evidence. In fact the U.S. Preventive Task Force, an evidence synthesis panel, recommends against even screening for vitamin D, noting that current evidence suggests that vitamin D does not provide benefit for most major outcomes (PMID 33847711).
The USPTF recommendations are based on the latest evidence. Extrapolating from mechanisms to shill for a supplement that is your affiliate is not a reliable way to communicate evidence or recommendations.
If you want to know whether you should supplement with vitamin D, talk with you doctor. Vitamin D is a powerful biologically active compounds. Don’t make your decisions based on unreliable marketing from a podcast.
Donate by clicking here: thedietwars.com/support-me



![Is resistance training overhyped?
When it comes to promoting resistance training for health, lifting bros want it both ways.
They refuse to let anyone criticize any of their current lifting practices—despite an injury rate between 1-2 injuries per year for most strength sports [1]. They downplay increasing rates of body dysmorphia among men [2], eating disorders [3], and the psychological and physical risks associated with the lifestyles idolized by their communities [4-6].
In the same breath, they extol the health benefits of resistance training, comparing it to medicines, listing endless benefits.
Now imagine that there was a drug that produced 1-2 substantial injuries per year and did so for as long as the person took the drug.
Imagine that some of these acute injuries would eventually culminate in lifelong, chronic injuries. That’s 10-20 acute injuries per decade and some chronic injuries.
And that’s just on average.
And that’s just injuries.
Would many people forgo the drug, especially if it required a large amount of effort, every single week, to take? You bet ya.
So what explains the contradictions here:
Treating resistance training as if it were an extremely important tool for longevity, yet being extremely resistant to changing the culture around resistance training in order to reduce risk of harm and make it optimally healthy for the average person?
The answer is pretty simple: lifting bros simply enjoy resistance training and positive messages about it. But they don’t want to question what they are doing or promoting to make their messages fully coherent. They promote good news about resistance training, claiming that they want everyone to engage with it, but they don’t want to do the actual work of making it more accessible to the person who finds the toxic bro culture off-putting
This is not unlike the health communities that I have criticized in the past. In fact, it’s exactly the same phenomenon.
For making resistance training more popular, the resistance community is its own worst enemy.
PMIDs:
[1] 27328853
[2] 27930760
[3] 34712596
[4] 24494162
[5] 31818274
[6] 17506239
Like, comment, subscribe.
For more, find me at:
PODCAST The Kevin Bass Show
YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/user/kbassphiladelphia
SUBREDDIT www.reddit.com/r/kevinbass
WEBSITE http://thedietwars.com
TWITTER https://twitter.com/kevinnbass/
https://twitter.com/healthmisinfo/
INSTAGRAM https://instagram.com/kevinnbass/
TIKTOK https://tiktok.com/@kevinnbass
And above all, please donate to support what I do:
PATREON https://patreon.com/kevinnbass/
DONATE https://thedietwars.com/support-me/ Is resistance training overhyped?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yXzJQHb-5xI/mqdefault.jpg)






