Uploaded April 2010 | Updated September 2026, 23 hours ago
The THIRD QUARTET is my sixth work using micro-intervals and my last to use quarter-tones. The more I worked with quarter-tones the more I realized that they provided a rather too-inflexible division of the octave. Now Im calling for quarter- and sixth-tones mixed. It was a curiously satisfying piece to write. Its a commonplace to describe sections of a piece as having written themselves when work was going at its best. But the whole of the quartet seemed something granted me rather than something Id invented or uncovered. My role seemed essentially that of amanuensis: to keep my mind open, follow it where it wanted to go, and record its trip. When it was finished, I saw that what had gone onto the page was a pretty conclusive survey, summing up, and dismissal, of what Id been doing up till then.
I came to a use of microtones not by whim, or because of an intellectual decision, nor from a desire to be epatant, but of necessity rather, indeed, against my better judgment: What composer wants to add still another obstacle to performance? I had known for a long time, of course, of Haba and Carillo and later of Vincentino, Yasser, the electronics people and Partch but their example was tangential to the music I was, and am, interested in and had done nothing to recommend my following them. It was only after I came to use microtones that I discovered that a goodly number of composers around my age were finding themselves compelled to the same thng. --
Ezra Simms
The composition of Ezra Simms THIRD QUARTET was made possible by a Guggenheim and a commission from the Endicott Fund. The composition was begun in Roxbury, Massachusetts, continued in New York and San Francisco, and finished in Tokyo. It is dedicated to the Lenox Quartet, which gave it its first performance in Carnegie Recital Hall in 1965.
Ezra Simms was born in Birmingham, Alabama, and stuied at Mills College in Oakland with Darius Milhaud and Leon Kirchner.
The THIRD QUARTET is my sixth work using micro-intervals and my last to use quarter-tones. The more I worked with quarter-tones the more I realized that they provided a rather too-inflexible division of the octave. Now Im calling for quarter- and sixth-tones mixed. It was a curiously satisfying piece to write. Its a commonplace to describe sections of a piece as having written themselves when work was going at its best. But the whole of the quartet seemed something granted me rather than something Id invented or uncovered. My role seemed essentially that of amanuensis: to keep my mind open, follow it where it wanted to go, and record its trip. When it was finished, I saw that what had gone onto the page was a pretty conclusive survey, summing up, and dismissal, of what Id been doing up till then.
I came to a use of microtones not by whim, or because of an intellectual decision, nor from a desire to be epatant, but of necessity rather, indeed, against my better judgment: What composer wants to add still another obstacle to performance? I had known for a long time, of course, of Haba and Carillo and later of Vincentino, Yasser, the electronics people and Partch but their example was tangential to the music I was, and am, interested in and had done nothing to recommend my following them. It was only after I came to use microtones that I discovered that a goodly number of composers around my age were finding themselves compelled to the same thng. --
Ezra Simms
The composition of Ezra Simms THIRD QUARTET was made possible by a Guggenheim and a commission from the Endicott Fund. The composition was begun in Roxbury, Massachusetts, continued in New York and San Francisco, and finished in Tokyo. It is dedicated to the Lenox Quartet, which gave it its first performance in Carnegie Recital Hall in 1965.
Ezra Simms was born in Birmingham, Alabama, and stuied at Mills College in Oakland with Darius Milhaud and Leon Kirchner.

![Karel Goeyvaerts, Sonata für zwei Klaviere, 2. Satz(K.Goeyvaerts & Karlheinz Stockhausen, Klavier)
Darmstadt, 1951: The now famous, often-repeated ancecdote about the premiere of the second movement of the Sonata for Two Pianos, which Karel Goeyvaerts and Karlheinz Stockhausen presented in the composition course given by Theodor W. Adorno: Adorno reacted to the sparse sequence of notes with the question, Why did you write it for two pianos? Goeyvaerts who spoke only a little German was thrown off at first; but then Stockhausen stood up and offered a clear analysis of the composition. Adorno asked about the classical foundations of music, such as motif, antecedent and consequent phrase. Professor, answered Stockhausen, you are looking for a chicken in an abstract painting. In a radio address three years later, Adorno discussed the scene again: Critics cannot be blamed for not having understood this latest form of rationality set free; for, by its own agenda, it wishes not to be understood but to be demonstrated. Any question regarding the function of any phenomenon in the context of the composition is responded to with derivations from within the system itself.
After studies at the Royal Flemish Music Conservatory in Antwerp, Goeyvaerts studied composition in Paris with Darius Milhaud and analysis with Olivier Messiaen. He also studied ondes martenot with Maurice Martenot, who invented the instrument (Delaere 2001).
In 1951, Goeyvaerts attended the famous Darmstadt New Music Summer School where he met Karlheinz Stockhausen who was five years younger. Both were devout Catholics and found ways of integrating religious numerology into their serial compositions. They found themselves deep in conversation, and performed a movement from Goeyvaertss Nummer 1, Sonata for 2 pianos in the composition course by Theodor Adorno there. They were both astonished upon hearing for the first time Messiaens Mode de valeurs et dintensités (from Quatre Études de rhythme), in a recording by the composer which Antoine Goléa played at a lecture. These experiences together convinced Stockhausen he should study with Messiaen.
Goeyvaerts became very excited in 1952 when he learned that Stockhausen had access in Paris to a generator of sine waves. Goeyvaerts saw them as an important discovery for music: the purest sound possible. At the time, Stockhausen did not share his enthusiasm, owing partly to the inability with the equipment at hand to superimpose sine tones. Only later, after taking up his new post at the NWDR Electronic Music Studio in Cologne, did Stockhausen find more suitable equipment, in July 1953 (Toop 1979). One of the first works produced there was Goeyvaertss Nr. 5 with Pure Tones, which Stockhausen helped his friend to realize. (When Stockhausen seemingly abandoned his work with sine waves and returned to writing compositions for solo piano, Goeyvaerts felt that Stockhausen was abandoning an important discovery and took up the matter from a philosophical point of view himself.)
There has been some controversy about who wrote the first European total serial composition. His Nummer 2 (1951) for 13 instruments is one of the contenders (Delaere 1994, 13), as is his Nummer 1 (1950) Sonata for Two Pianos, and the Sonata for Two Pianos by Michel Fano (1950), depending on definitions of total serialism (Toop 1974).
After withdrawing from the musical world for a while, he accepted a position in 1970 at the Institute for Psychoacoustic and Electronic Music (IPEM) in Ghent, which led to several other prestigious appointments in Belgium. His works from after 1960 take on aspects of minimalism, the best-known examples being his series of five Litanies (1979 82) and his final work, the opera Aquarius (1983 93). Though minimalism is ordinarily thought of as a reaction against serialism, for Goeyvaerts both techniques were merely subcategories of a non-dynamic, static music (Delaere, Beirens, and Staples 2004, 32 33). Analyses of his early serial compositions (especially the electronic Nr. 4, met dode tonen [with dead tones] and Nr. 5, met zuivere tonen [with pure tones]) reveal how close the connections actually are (Sabbe 1977). [The perpetrator of this channel take the liberty of expressing his strong disagreement with Goeyvaerts in this matter, and regrets this composers sad regression into minimalism at the end of his career.] Goeyvaerts died suddenly in 1993. Karel Goeyvaerts, Sonata für zwei Klaviere, 2. Satz(K.Goeyvaerts & Karlheinz Stockhausen, Klavier)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gDDFbMKde-c/mqdefault.jpg)






![Artur Schnabel, String Quartet No. 4 - i Molto moderato
Despite his performing repertoire being concentrated largely on the works of Beethoven, Schubert, Mozart and Brahms, almost all of Artur Schnabels own compositions (none of which are in the active repertoire) are atonal. (It is interesting, in this regard, to note that Schnabel was a close friend of Arnold Schoenberg, his Austrian-American compatriot, who was famous as a pioneering composer of atonal and twelve-tone music.) They are difficult yet fascinating and complex works, and are marked by genuine originality of style. Composers Ernst Krenek and Roger Sessions have commented that they show signs of undoubted genius (see biography of Schnabel by Cesar Saerchinger). Schnabels list of compositions eventually included three symphonies, a piano concerto, a piano sonata (premiered by Eduard Erdmann at the 1925 Venice ISCM Festival[10]) and five string quartets, amongst various smaller works.
Harmonically, the first movement of Artur Schnabels fourth string quartet (dating from 1924) is by far the most complex of the quartet, making extensive use of unordered aggregates one per measure or, in other words, the use of all twelve pitches (or more properly pitch classes) in each of the initial measures for quite an extended period. Indeed, one could speculate that this use of all pitch classes per measure is the factor which determines the placement of the barlines.
From 1925 Schnabel taught at the Berlin State Academy, where his masterclasses brought him great renown. Among Schnabels many piano pupils were Clifford Curzon, Rudolf Firkušný, Adrian Aeschbacher, Lili Kraus, Leon Fleisher, Carlo Zecchi, Claude Frank, Leonard Shure, Alan Bush, Nancy Weir, Konrad Wolff, Jascha Spivakovsky, Eunice Norton, Henry Jolles, and radio personality Karl Haas. His last and favourite pupil was Maria Curcio. Artur Schnabel, String Quartet No. 4 - i Molto moderato](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jJjtOvJtM2k/mqdefault.jpg)
![René Koering, Quatuor No 2nd mouvement, largo [second movement of two]
On dit et on répète à tous les compositeurs depuis Beethoven que la forme du quatuor à cordes est la chose la plus difficile (les vrais pervers, après vous avoir asséné cette vérité historique, vous font savoir que la vraie difficulté est le trio à cordes mais que ce divertissement nest réservé quà la catégorie quatre étoiles des compositeurs).
Je pense au contraire quil y a dans laustère (et brillante) gymnastique de quatuor une première « facilité* qui est celle des vois intermédiaires (situées entre le dessus et la basse) nécessaires à tout épanouissement. Et que ces deux voix (voies), tellement indispensables à la plénitude du discours ne sont vraiment exploitables que dans la formule du quatuor à cordes. En effet, le répartitions sur lambitus sont parfaites entre le do grave du violoncelle et lut ultime du violon, en passant par le second violon et le bienheureux alto. De là extrême confort du compositeur, libéré du handicap des deux mains au piano ou des innombrables pièges des jeux de cache cache à lorchestre. Là, tout est clair, chaque note est entendue et la virtuosité est lenfant de Bohême dont rêve limpétrant.
Cest pourquoi je me pose souvent le question des multiples et inutiles séductions ajoutées à la musique, depuis le piano jusquà lorchestres « gurreliederien », il existe, je le sais, le pur raffinement de la beauté « quartetisante ». Alors pourquoi hésiter ?
Parce quil est difficil dimaginer un audimat que satisfasse un éditeur, même passionné de quatuor, marié à un compositeur fécond seulement dans ce domaine. La carrière internationale et triomphante de Georges Onslow est là pous nous le rappeler. (Nata : Onslow est lauteur de 35 quatuors et 34 quintettes dans la continuité rare et appréciable de Schubert.)
Finalement je conclus, à titre personnel, que le quatuor à cordes simpose sans discussion possible au moment où la nostalgie du pays perdue ou égaré sempare de moi et que remonter à la surface, aborder les plages aux franges de lexistence, ne peut se faire quà la condition « quartettane ».
René Koering René Koering, Quatuor No 2nd mouvement, largo [second movement of two]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jbpD3mJL9O8/mqdefault.jpg)
