Eugenie Scott explains why science is agnostic. @DonExodus2
Eugenie Scott explains why science is agnostic.  @DonExodus2
Uploaded April 2009 | Updated September 2026, 4 days ago
-=Expand before commenting=- NCSE director Eugenie Scott explains why science is, by definition agnostic, and cannot be made to prove, or disprove the existence of God. I also clear up a misconception from a previous video.

I'm not sure why people are having such a difficult time understanding this- its not controversial or complicated. Science CAN disprove factual claims in religious texts (ie a 6000 year old Earth), but NOT that some sort of deity exists. She is not saying to twist science, rather, she is warning us not to stretch its utility. She is also not saying that evidence supports a belief in God- she's an atheist...

After reading a lot of the comments, its clear that some people have such a knee jerk reaction to anything slightly promoting tolerance of religion that they don't even think about what Dr. Scott is saying.
Please think before commenting.
Eugenie Scott explains why science is agnostic.How Evolution Works- Introduction (Part I)Re: Revelation about Christianity - Part 2Debating Creationists - IIWhy Same Designer, Same Genes is not a valid argument.Part 4/6 My Debate: Is there evidence for the existence of God?  Part 4/6Re: 20 Evolutionist Logic Errors:1This is Why Every Scientist Accepts EvolutionProof of Evolution - Part 3 (Atavisms and Fossils)Part 3/6  My Debate: Is there evidence for the existence of God?  Part 3/6Re: A Bit More About ArchaeopteryxRefuting Way of the Master Part 3
DonExodus2 |

Eugenie Scott explains why science is agnostic.

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER