Uploaded May 2023 | Updated September 2026, 6 hours ago
If your beloved doggie has lymphoma, I wanted to share with you a "how-to" guide on this horrible time, and what options are available. Lymphoma, is cancer of the lymph nodes, and is detected by enlarged lymph nodes under your dog's chin and on the rear legs. When these nodes enlarge, it usually means lymphoma, a very common form of cancer. Normally, your beloved family member only has about four to six weeks to live. You must act quickly. Check your doggie now, and look for the subtle cues of lymphoma. I describe a way that I call the "bottle trick," which is where you use a spray bottle and gently get it into your dog's mouth, and spray cool water into his mouth as he will start drinking less water, and then refuse food and water completely. At the end stages, as the body shuts down, your dog won't want to eat or drink, which only makes their suffering worse. With the bottle, the dog's mouth is open, and you can insert medicine and soft food into his mouth from the side while water goes down his throat. Go slow. When your dog gets a fever, move him to a cold floor and spray him down with cold mist. Dog's don't perspire, so help him regulate his temperature. During the final stages, your dog might engage in "hiding," could experience "head pressing" (pressing his head into the wall), extreme lethargy, dementia, collapsing and loss of bowels. I found that euthansia at home was the best option. Your dog is in his home environment, is comfortable and not stressed by being driven to a hospital. Be with your doggie as the process takes place. It's very hard to be there at his side, but you are his comfort. You are his whole world. He needs you to be there with him. As a pet parent, putting your pet to sleep will be among the hardest decisions you'll ever make. Make sure you get pain medications for your dog. He will need them to battle the end stages of cancer. I am sorry for your loss. Dogs are pure souls. Then love unconditionally, and are so loyal and such great companions. They are only with us for a short time, and are so magnificent. I hope you find this information helpful.
If your beloved doggie has lymphoma, I wanted to share with you a "how-to" guide on this horrible time, and what options are available. Lymphoma, is cancer of the lymph nodes, and is detected by enlarged lymph nodes under your dog's chin and on the rear legs. When these nodes enlarge, it usually means lymphoma, a very common form of cancer. Normally, your beloved family member only has about four to six weeks to live. You must act quickly. Check your doggie now, and look for the subtle cues of lymphoma. I describe a way that I call the "bottle trick," which is where you use a spray bottle and gently get it into your dog's mouth, and spray cool water into his mouth as he will start drinking less water, and then refuse food and water completely. At the end stages, as the body shuts down, your dog won't want to eat or drink, which only makes their suffering worse. With the bottle, the dog's mouth is open, and you can insert medicine and soft food into his mouth from the side while water goes down his throat. Go slow. When your dog gets a fever, move him to a cold floor and spray him down with cold mist. Dog's don't perspire, so help him regulate his temperature. During the final stages, your dog might engage in "hiding," could experience "head pressing" (pressing his head into the wall), extreme lethargy, dementia, collapsing and loss of bowels. I found that euthansia at home was the best option. Your dog is in his home environment, is comfortable and not stressed by being driven to a hospital. Be with your doggie as the process takes place. It's very hard to be there at his side, but you are his comfort. You are his whole world. He needs you to be there with him. As a pet parent, putting your pet to sleep will be among the hardest decisions you'll ever make. Make sure you get pain medications for your dog. He will need them to battle the end stages of cancer. I am sorry for your loss. Dogs are pure souls. Then love unconditionally, and are so loyal and such great companions. They are only with us for a short time, and are so magnificent. I hope you find this information helpful.
![Trial Lawyer Reviews Jose DeCastros Appeal. Will Willson Decision Reverse The Obstruction Charge?
Jose “Chille” DeCastro has a new case to deal with, Willson v. First Judicial District (2024), as it concerns his “obstruction” conviction. Spoiler alert: I would need to review the trial again to gain insight as to whether in light of Willson he would still be convicted on this charge.
Constitutional challenges are very complex. The statute could be so poorly written that nobody can really understand it, or its plain language is ambiguous and vague, or it can be discriminatory in its application, among others.
The case – the first reported decision since the statute was passed in 1911` - has narrowed the focus and reach of this statute to “specific” and not “general” intent. The case further held that it obstruction is limited to physical conduct and “fighting words.” The appellate court essentially admitted that the District Court was understandably in a bind trying to interpret a statute that looks unconstitutional to me, since that’s problem with unconstitutional statutes – you can’t figure them out with any precision. The appellate court stated: “Therefore, we conclude NRS 197.190 is ambiguous as to whether it prohibits speech.” While limiting it to physical conduct and “fighting words,” the appellate court still left open the possibility that non-physical acts and non-fighting words could still trigger a conviction. The appellate court canvassed other states in an aid to interpret it without invalidating it. There is no legislative history for the appellate court to consider when the legislature passed this statute.
The appellate court left in important exceptions: “Strictly speaking, the spoken word may slow, hamper, prevent, or impede a public officer from performing their duties….[Citations]. (stating “the spoken word can be just as effective in impeding an officer in the discharge of his duty as if the orater [sic] had grappled with the officer”); see also Scott, 131 Nev. at 1022, 363 P.3d at 1164 (stating a pedestrian may hinder or delay a deputy sheriff by asking the deputy for directions while the deputy is directing traffic at an intersection). As such, NRS 197.190 may reasonably be interpreted as prohibiting speech that hinders, delays, or obstructs a public officer. And, “The specific intent requirement also may not, in itself, provide sufficient guidance to law enforcement in the statutes application. See Hill, 482 U.S. at 469 n.18 (stating an intent requirement would not “cabin the excessive discretion the ordinance provides to officers”); Scott, 131 Nev. at 1027 n.6, 363 P.3d at 1168 n.6 (Hardesty, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (stating “there is little doubt” an obstruction ordinance would survive constitutional scrutiny if interpreted to require both specific intent and physical conduct or fighting words)” And this: “We note that NRS 197.190 does not require the use of force or violence, and that a persons action (e.g., blocking the path of an officer) or inaction (e.g., refusing to obey a lawful order) may constitute physical conduct that hinders, delays, or obstructs an officer. See State v. Hudson, 784 P.2d 533, 537 (Wash. Ct. App. 1990) (recognizing that “nonaggressive behavior” may hinder, delay, or obstruct an officer just as “assaultive conduct”); see also Christopher Hall, Annotation, What Constitutes Obstructing or Resisting Officer, in Absence of Actual Force, 66 A.L.R.5th 397 (1999) (collecting cases where courts have determined what constitutes obstructing an officer in the absence of actual force). Of course, whether a persons physical conduct actually hinders, delays, or obstructs a public officer is a question to be resolved by the trier of fact in a given case.”
This will require a review of the trial again to see if anything Chille did or said still constitutes obstruction. That will be a video for a later date.
None of this legal advice, nor can it be relied upon. This is the perspective from a California lawyer, and who is commenting on a public issue. All rights reserved, including anti-SLAPP defenses. No attorney client relationship is formed or implied. This information may not be relied upon. Seek advice from a locally licensed attorney. Trial Lawyer Reviews Jose DeCastros Appeal. Will Willson Decision Reverse The Obstruction Charge?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/54AT_RMBFMk/mqdefault.jpg)









