Uploaded December 2020 | Updated September 2026, 1 day ago
Here I respond to a recent answer given by William Lane Craig to a question about the causal principle (everything that begins has a cause) asked by Nathan and me in a recent stream about the Kalam Cosmological Argument. I argue that Craig fails to answer the question satisfactorily, and actually raises more problems for his argument.
00:00 Introduction and the question
03:34 Causation and spatiotemporal events
09:25 Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article
16:30 Why this matters for the Kalam
20:18 Responding to the causal principle
28:23 Skepticism about introspection
Video with Craig's response:
youtu.be/B_9L1FTR8Jw?t=2260
Nathan and my video response to the Kalam:
youtube.com/watch?v=PNEpUEF9Ol4
My book Unreasonable Faith:
amazon.com/Unreasonable-Faith-William-Overstates-Christianity/dp/1912701189
Here I respond to a recent answer given by William Lane Craig to a question about the causal principle (everything that begins has a cause) asked by Nathan and me in a recent stream about the Kalam Cosmological Argument. I argue that Craig fails to answer the question satisfactorily, and actually raises more problems for his argument.
00:00 Introduction and the question
03:34 Causation and spatiotemporal events
09:25 Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article
16:30 Why this matters for the Kalam
20:18 Responding to the causal principle
28:23 Skepticism about introspection
Video with Craig's response:
youtu.be/B_9L1FTR8Jw?t=2260
Nathan and my video response to the Kalam:
youtube.com/watch?v=PNEpUEF9Ol4
My book Unreasonable Faith:
amazon.com/Unreasonable-Faith-William-Overstates-Christianity/dp/1912701189










