Craig Responds about the Causal Principle - and Fails to Answer the Question! @JamesFodor
Craig Responds about the Causal Principle - and Fails to Answer the Question!  @JamesFodor
Uploaded December 2020 | Updated September 2026, 1 day ago
Here I respond to a recent answer given by William Lane Craig to a question about the causal principle (everything that begins has a cause) asked by Nathan and me in a recent stream about the Kalam Cosmological Argument. I argue that Craig fails to answer the question satisfactorily, and actually raises more problems for his argument.

00:00 Introduction and the question
03:34 Causation and spatiotemporal events
09:25 Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article
16:30 Why this matters for the Kalam
20:18 Responding to the causal principle
28:23 Skepticism about introspection

Video with Craig's response:
youtu.be/B_9L1FTR8Jw?t=2260

Nathan and my video response to the Kalam:
youtube.com/watch?v=PNEpUEF9Ol4
My book Unreasonable Faith:
amazon.com/Unreasonable-Faith-William-Overstates-Christianity/dp/1912701189
Craig Responds about the Causal Principle - and Fails to Answer the Question!Is Life Meaningful Without God: Theist vs Atheist Debate Part 1 - Opening RemarksUnreasonable Faith Audiobook - Chapter Two: the Kalam Cosmological Argument Part 3A Critique of Substance Dualism Part 2 - Responding to @faithbecauseofreason8381 ​More Responses to Craig on Causation and the UniverseIs Life Meaningful Without God: Theist vs Atheist Debate Part 2 - Discussion and Q&AGod Explains Nothing about ConsciousnessWhy God is Never a Good ExplanationDebate with Inspiring Philosophy after chatBraxton Says the Darndest Things - Why (some) Christians Talk Like ThisPhilosophy, Critical Thinking, and Misinformation TalkA Cavalcade of Crazy Christian Claptrap
James Fodor |

Craig Responds about the Causal Principle - and Fails to Answer the Question!

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER