A Critique of Substance Dualism Part 2 - Responding to @faithbecauseofreason8381 ​ @JamesFodor
A Critique of Substance Dualism Part 2 - Responding to @faithbecauseofreason8381 ​  @JamesFodor
Uploaded June 2025 | Updated September 2026, 1 day ago
A critique of David Pallmann's (Faith Because of Reason) responses to arguments against substance dualism, including the pairing problem, the interaction problem, and the causal closure objection, and find that he fails to present a coherent, explanatory alternative to physicalism about the mind.

Link to part 1: youtube.com/watch?v=9COVx5pwQUw
A Critique of Substance Dualism Part 2 - Responding to @faithbecauseofreason8381 ​More Responses to Craig on Causation and the UniverseIs Life Meaningful Without God: Theist vs Atheist Debate Part 2 - Discussion and Q&AGod Explains Nothing about ConsciousnessWhy God is Never a Good ExplanationDebate with Inspiring Philosophy after chatBraxton Says the Darndest Things - Why (some) Christians Talk Like ThisPhilosophy, Critical Thinking, and Misinformation TalkA Cavalcade of Crazy Christian ClaptrapUnreasonable Faith Audiobook - Chapter Two: the Kalam Cosmological Argument Part 1Lets review some more Capturing Christianity CringeResponding to Digital Gnosis on askcliffe - terrible arguments for Christianity
James Fodor |

A Critique of Substance Dualism Part 2 - Responding to @faithbecauseofreason8381 ​

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER