Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Benny Hinn is now going after the critics of Kenneth Copeland, and instead of dealing with the actual concerns people have raised about Copeland’s theology, health teachings, prosperity message, and decades of controversial claims, the conversation quickly turns into defending the man rather than examining the doctrine.
Original video: youtube.com/live/-604-FNl7tk?si=AAG8wUH25AMXI-uU
That is the problem.
Criticism is not persecution. Accountability is not an attack. And asking whether a preacher’s public teachings line up with Scripture is not the same thing as dishonoring them.
Kenneth Copeland has spent decades making extremely strong claims about divine health, faith, healing, prosperity, confession, and the authority of the believer. If those teachings are public, then they are open to public examination.
The biblical question should always be simple:
**Is what he teaches actually true?**
Not:
“Who are you to criticize him?”
Not:
“Don’t touch God’s anointed.”
Not:
“You’re attacking a man of God.”
The Bereans were called noble because they examined what they were being taught against Scripture. Paul himself said his teaching should be tested. Biblical leadership is not supposed to create immunity from scrutiny.
In this video, we look at Benny Hinn’s response to Kenneth Copeland’s critics and why defending a preacher’s reputation cannot become more important than defending sound doctrine.
If Kenneth Copeland has taught something biblical, then Scripture should be able to support it.
If he has taught something false, then his age, influence, friendships, wealth, or ministry history do not make it untouchable.
And if Benny Hinn wants to defend him, the strongest defense would be to answer the criticism with the Bible—not attack the people asking the questions.
Let me know what you think: **Has the modern church confused biblical honor with protecting powerful preachers from accountability?**
#BennyHinn #KennethCopeland #WordOfFaith #ProsperityGospel #FalseTeaching #ChristianCommentary #AllThingsTheology
Software I use (Ecamm) Sign up with this link: ecamm.com/mac/ecammlive/?fp_ref=christopher23
AFFILIATES
Amazon: amazon.com/shop/allthingstheology
Covenant Eyes: covenanteyes.sjv.io/zNYmqG
Join this channel to get access to perks:
youtube.com/channel/UCrLO95wGXUW0fY00Rss4aGw/join
Website: kdubtru.com
Music: open.spotify.com/artist/1TohVbZFbpZsW5yubbhYm3
Subscribe & click 🛎 for notifications of premieres and live
streams!
Follow me on social media:
Twitter.com/kdubtru
Facebook.com/allthingstheology
instagram.com/kdub.tru
SUPPORT:
Patreon.com/kdubtru
Listen on podcast: https://anchor.fm/allthingstheology
Email for interviews or booking:
allthingstheology@gmail.com
Benny Hinn is now going after the critics of Kenneth Copeland, and instead of dealing with the actual concerns people have raised about Copeland’s theology, health teachings, prosperity message, and decades of controversial claims, the conversation quickly turns into defending the man rather than examining the doctrine.
Original video: youtube.com/live/-604-FNl7tk?si=AAG8wUH25AMXI-uU
That is the problem.
Criticism is not persecution. Accountability is not an attack. And asking whether a preacher’s public teachings line up with Scripture is not the same thing as dishonoring them.
Kenneth Copeland has spent decades making extremely strong claims about divine health, faith, healing, prosperity, confession, and the authority of the believer. If those teachings are public, then they are open to public examination.
The biblical question should always be simple:
**Is what he teaches actually true?**
Not:
“Who are you to criticize him?”
Not:
“Don’t touch God’s anointed.”
Not:
“You’re attacking a man of God.”
The Bereans were called noble because they examined what they were being taught against Scripture. Paul himself said his teaching should be tested. Biblical leadership is not supposed to create immunity from scrutiny.
In this video, we look at Benny Hinn’s response to Kenneth Copeland’s critics and why defending a preacher’s reputation cannot become more important than defending sound doctrine.
If Kenneth Copeland has taught something biblical, then Scripture should be able to support it.
If he has taught something false, then his age, influence, friendships, wealth, or ministry history do not make it untouchable.
And if Benny Hinn wants to defend him, the strongest defense would be to answer the criticism with the Bible—not attack the people asking the questions.
Let me know what you think: **Has the modern church confused biblical honor with protecting powerful preachers from accountability?**
#BennyHinn #KennethCopeland #WordOfFaith #ProsperityGospel #FalseTeaching #ChristianCommentary #AllThingsTheology
Software I use (Ecamm) Sign up with this link: ecamm.com/mac/ecammlive/?fp_ref=christopher23
AFFILIATES
Amazon: amazon.com/shop/allthingstheology
Covenant Eyes: covenanteyes.sjv.io/zNYmqG
Join this channel to get access to perks:
youtube.com/channel/UCrLO95wGXUW0fY00Rss4aGw/join
Website: kdubtru.com
Music: open.spotify.com/artist/1TohVbZFbpZsW5yubbhYm3
Subscribe & click 🛎 for notifications of premieres and live
streams!
Follow me on social media:
Twitter.com/kdubtru
Facebook.com/allthingstheology
instagram.com/kdub.tru
SUPPORT:
Patreon.com/kdubtru
Listen on podcast: https://anchor.fm/allthingstheology
Email for interviews or booking:
allthingstheology@gmail.com
