Bayes, Skeptics, and the Resurrection 2 @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Bayes, Skeptics, and the Resurrection 2  @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Uploaded March 2026 | Updated September 2026, 6 days ago
Than Christopoulos and I continue discussing the resurrection, the max data case, and skepticism. In this video our topic is the fact that Brian Blais and Paulogia simply dismissed all the evidence for the historical reportage model of the Gospels despite its relevance to the resurrection.

Here is their video which we're responding to:

youtube.com/watch?v=v6QenX4Oo78

Here is a long video on Inspiring Philosophy about Gospel reliability. Note: I (Lydia) *have not* watched this video and *am not* saying that I endorse everything in it (because I haven't watched it). I'm including it for reference purposes because Than mentions it several times:

youtube.com/watch?v=aacs0_E7Qdw

My own work on Gospel reliability is contained in four books, many lectures, and in a huge number of videos on this channel. Here is my author page on Amazon:

amazon.com/stores/Lydia-McGrew/author/B073V1ZP1Y?ref=ap_rdr&shoppingPortalEnabled=true&ccs_id=72037756-4169-401f-aa11-b167b0794c46

Thanks again to Erik Manning (@TestifyApologetics ) for his help on this series.
Bayes, Skeptics, and the Resurrection 2Is this ancient novel realistic??No, not THOSE group appearances!Name Statistics Argument 7: Disambiguation and Unnecessary ClumpsName Statistics Argument 1: Whats it all about?Undesigned coincidences: Parable of the vineyard 1Bereavement Apparitions 3: Does not approach, cannot be followedUnexplained allusions: The little ladder at CivitellaDo Secular Historians Talk About Source Reliability? Woodman and KrausAuthorship of John Part 2: Our Earliest EvidenceAlleged seams in John part 2: Into the Judean landName Statistics Argument 2: Mutilating the Sample
Lydia McGrew |

Bayes, Skeptics, and the Resurrection 2

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER