Authorship of John Part 2: Our Earliest Evidence @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Authorship of John Part 2: Our Earliest Evidence  @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Uploaded December 2025 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Here I talk about the earliest evidence we have about the authorship of John. as it happens, the author isn't named as "John" in this evidence, but it is still very valuable. It's very important to remember that "the earliest evidence that has come down to us" isn't "the earliest evidence that ever existed." Many ancient writings have simply been lost.

See here for a discussion of Bart Ehrman's misuse of the term "anonymous."

lydiaswebpage.blogspot.com/2015/07/on-bart-ehrman-and-authorship-of-gospels.html

If you want to hear me read my favorite Richard Bauckham quotation, which I allude to in the video, you can get that here:

youtu.be/Ineqa_QL9aw?si=8ufEXQtIH4zDdq40&t=1091

The Eye of the Beholder is available on Amazon:

amazon.com/Eye-Beholder-Gospel-Historical-Reportage/dp/1947929151

Or Logos users can get it here:

logos.com/product/416637/the-eye-of-the-beholder-the-gospel-of-john-as-historical-reportage
Authorship of John Part 2: Our Earliest EvidenceAlleged seams in John part 2: Into the Judean landName Statistics Argument 2: Mutilating the SampleEditorial Fatigue, Probably Not 4Easter reading 4: That will be a merry meeting!Running back to the prior 2: Vagueness, laziness, and antisupernaturalismName statistics argument 9: Judas Not Iscariot and Joseph Barsabbas (Justus)Name Statistics Argument 3: Some effects of mutilating the sampleNew Undesigned Coincidence in Acts 20:4Consensus, Bullying, and Social Pressure in Gospels StudiesThe Rigid Rule of All-or-nothing Factual IndependenceMisunderstandings of Liberal Scholars 1: Bad tone warning
Lydia McGrew |

Authorship of John Part 2: Our Earliest Evidence

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER