Alleged seams in John part 2: Into the Judean land @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Alleged seams in John part 2: Into the Judean land  @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Uploaded September 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Today I'm talking about the alleged "seam" in John 3:22, which says that after these things, Jesus and his disciples came/went "into the Judean land." Does this mean that they weren't in Judea before? Is this an internal contradiction, because Jesus was already in Judea, in Jerusalem, in the preceding events? And does it mean that an editor was trying awkwardly to fit stories together in the Gospel?

I answer "no" to all these questions.

Here are various translations of the verse:

biblehub.com/john/3-22.htm

Here is the Greek text analysis page:

biblehub.com/text/john/3-22.htm

Here is my video on four ways of narrating time. (But note: In this case I don't even think the narration is achronological.)

youtube.com/watch?v=n4TzGiFCeLE&t=8s

Thumbnail by Foto: Jonn Leffmann, CC BY 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=122817403
Alleged seams in John part 2: Into the Judean landName Statistics Argument 2: Mutilating the SampleEditorial Fatigue, Probably Not 4Easter reading 4: That will be a merry meeting!Running back to the prior 2: Vagueness, laziness, and antisupernaturalismName statistics argument 9: Judas Not Iscariot and Joseph Barsabbas (Justus)Name Statistics Argument 3: Some effects of mutilating the sampleNew Undesigned Coincidence in Acts 20:4Consensus, Bullying, and Social Pressure in Gospels StudiesThe Rigid Rule of All-or-nothing Factual IndependenceMisunderstandings of Liberal Scholars 1: Bad tone warningEaster 2025: Where did the women see an angel?
Lydia McGrew |

Alleged seams in John part 2: "Into the Judean land"

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER