Uploaded April 2014 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
CORRECTIONS:
1) Sea level rise at the end of the last glaciation was 400 feet, not 200 feet.
2) @11:30 I show the wrong map from the 2004 Parry et al. paper. This one is without the effect of CO2 fertilization.
SOURCES:
1:48 "Recent Ice-Sheet Growth in the Interior of Greenland"
Ola M. Johannessen et al, Science November 2005
2:10 "Recent Greenland Ice Mass Loss by Drainage System from Satellite Gravity Observations" -- S. B. Luthcke, et al., Science November 2006
2:12 "Melting of Greenland Ice Sheet Satellite Gravity Measurements Confirm Accelerated Melting of Greenland Ice Sheet" --
J. L. Chen, et al., Science 2006
3:19 "Satellite gravity measurements confirm accelerated melting of Greenland ice sheet" J. Chen et al., Science, 2006
3:22 "Recent Greenland Ice Mass Loss by Drainage System from Satellite Gravity Observations" -- Luthcke et al, Science, 2006
3:24 "Lower estimates of Antarctic sea level contribution from satellite gravimetry" King et al, Nature 2012
3:26 Recent Antarctic ice mass loss from radar interferometry and regional climate modelling" -- Rignot et al, 2008
3:28 "Recent Contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise from GRACE"
3:30 "A Reconciled Estimate of Ice-Sheet Mass Balance"
Shepherd et al Science 2012
4:01 "Recent Contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise from GRACE"
4:24 "Toward prediction of environmental Arctic change"
W Maslowski, JC Kinney, J Jakacki - Computing in Science 2007
5:25 "Kinematic Constraints on Glacier Contributions to 21st-Century Sea-Level Rise" -- WT Pfeffer et al., Science 2008
5:40 "Global sea level linked to global temperature" --
Martin Vermeer and Stefan Rahmstorf, PNAS 2009
6:10 Table adapted from "Ranking Port Cities with High Exposure and Vulnerability to Climate Extremes"
-- R. J. Nicholls et al., OECD 2008
8:02 "Kinematic Constraints on Glacier Contributions to 21st-Century Sea-Level Rise" -- WT Pfeffer et al., Science 2008
8:57 "Climate: Observations, projections and Impacts" -- Met Office 2013.
metoffice.gov.uk/climate-guide/science/uk/obs-projections-impacts
10:05 "Precipitation and its extremes in changed climates"
-- T. Schneider and P. A. O'Gorman, Journal of Climate 2008
11:30 "Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios" -- Parry et al, Global Environmental Change 2004
11:52 "Threats to Water Supplies in the Tropical Andes" Bradley et al., Science 2006
11:55 "Evidence for Upwelling of Corrosive "Acidified" Water onto the Continental Shelf" -- Richard A. Feely, Science 2008
12:01 "Coral Reefs: Present Problems and Future Concerns Resulting from Anthropogenic Disturbance" -- RH Richmond, American Zoologist 1993
12:06 "Global Warming and Coastal Erosion" -- Zhang et al., Climatic Change
12: 08 "Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models" -- Cramer et al., Global Change Biology 2001
12:25 "The Recent Increase in Atlantic Hurricane Activity: Causes and Implications" -- Goldenberg, Science 2001
12:34 "A link between reduced Barents-Kara sea ice and cold winter extremes over northern continents"
Petoukhov, V., and V. A. Semenov,
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, Nov 2010
14:08 I backtracked this new "CAGW" label, and it seems to have started with author Michael Crichton in 2007, but was popularized in 2010 with an opinion piece in the Washington Post.
14:42 Table adapted from "Ranking Port Cities with High Exposure and Vulnerability to Climate Extremes"
-- R. J. Nicholls et al., OECD 2008
15:07 "Projected impacts of climate change on marine fish and fisheries"
Anne B. Hollowed
15:12 "Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change" -- UK Government report, 2006
17:47 Someone queried the nuclear fusion reactor - BP oil spill comparison.
I don't have my notes with me so I can't give you my source for the $28 billion. So let's look at a couple of other ratios.
According to ITER (the Experimental Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor), if all the manufacturing is done in Europe the estimated cost of building ITER, supported by the United States, the European Union, India, Japan, China, Russia, South Korea, has been estimated at approximately $14.4 billion (at April 2016 exchange rates.) That's around a third the estimated cost of the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico ($42 billion)." (SOURCE: iter.org/faq#Do_we_really_know_how_much_ITER_will_cost) "Based on the European evaluation, we can estimate the cost of ITER construction for the seven members at approximately EUR 13 billion, if all the manufacturing is done in Europe." )
Or, looking at it another way, the cost of building the National Ignition Facility -- a key research project into nuclear fusion -- was less that 10% of the cost of the BP oil spill.
CORRECTIONS:
1) Sea level rise at the end of the last glaciation was 400 feet, not 200 feet.
2) @11:30 I show the wrong map from the 2004 Parry et al. paper. This one is without the effect of CO2 fertilization.
SOURCES:
1:48 "Recent Ice-Sheet Growth in the Interior of Greenland"
Ola M. Johannessen et al, Science November 2005
2:10 "Recent Greenland Ice Mass Loss by Drainage System from Satellite Gravity Observations" -- S. B. Luthcke, et al., Science November 2006
2:12 "Melting of Greenland Ice Sheet Satellite Gravity Measurements Confirm Accelerated Melting of Greenland Ice Sheet" --
J. L. Chen, et al., Science 2006
3:19 "Satellite gravity measurements confirm accelerated melting of Greenland ice sheet" J. Chen et al., Science, 2006
3:22 "Recent Greenland Ice Mass Loss by Drainage System from Satellite Gravity Observations" -- Luthcke et al, Science, 2006
3:24 "Lower estimates of Antarctic sea level contribution from satellite gravimetry" King et al, Nature 2012
3:26 Recent Antarctic ice mass loss from radar interferometry and regional climate modelling" -- Rignot et al, 2008
3:28 "Recent Contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise from GRACE"
3:30 "A Reconciled Estimate of Ice-Sheet Mass Balance"
Shepherd et al Science 2012
4:01 "Recent Contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise from GRACE"
4:24 "Toward prediction of environmental Arctic change"
W Maslowski, JC Kinney, J Jakacki - Computing in Science 2007
5:25 "Kinematic Constraints on Glacier Contributions to 21st-Century Sea-Level Rise" -- WT Pfeffer et al., Science 2008
5:40 "Global sea level linked to global temperature" --
Martin Vermeer and Stefan Rahmstorf, PNAS 2009
6:10 Table adapted from "Ranking Port Cities with High Exposure and Vulnerability to Climate Extremes"
-- R. J. Nicholls et al., OECD 2008
8:02 "Kinematic Constraints on Glacier Contributions to 21st-Century Sea-Level Rise" -- WT Pfeffer et al., Science 2008
8:57 "Climate: Observations, projections and Impacts" -- Met Office 2013.
metoffice.gov.uk/climate-guide/science/uk/obs-projections-impacts
10:05 "Precipitation and its extremes in changed climates"
-- T. Schneider and P. A. O'Gorman, Journal of Climate 2008
11:30 "Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios" -- Parry et al, Global Environmental Change 2004
11:52 "Threats to Water Supplies in the Tropical Andes" Bradley et al., Science 2006
11:55 "Evidence for Upwelling of Corrosive "Acidified" Water onto the Continental Shelf" -- Richard A. Feely, Science 2008
12:01 "Coral Reefs: Present Problems and Future Concerns Resulting from Anthropogenic Disturbance" -- RH Richmond, American Zoologist 1993
12:06 "Global Warming and Coastal Erosion" -- Zhang et al., Climatic Change
12: 08 "Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models" -- Cramer et al., Global Change Biology 2001
12:25 "The Recent Increase in Atlantic Hurricane Activity: Causes and Implications" -- Goldenberg, Science 2001
12:34 "A link between reduced Barents-Kara sea ice and cold winter extremes over northern continents"
Petoukhov, V., and V. A. Semenov,
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, Nov 2010
14:08 I backtracked this new "CAGW" label, and it seems to have started with author Michael Crichton in 2007, but was popularized in 2010 with an opinion piece in the Washington Post.
14:42 Table adapted from "Ranking Port Cities with High Exposure and Vulnerability to Climate Extremes"
-- R. J. Nicholls et al., OECD 2008
15:07 "Projected impacts of climate change on marine fish and fisheries"
Anne B. Hollowed
15:12 "Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change" -- UK Government report, 2006
17:47 Someone queried the nuclear fusion reactor - BP oil spill comparison.
I don't have my notes with me so I can't give you my source for the $28 billion. So let's look at a couple of other ratios.
According to ITER (the Experimental Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor), if all the manufacturing is done in Europe the estimated cost of building ITER, supported by the United States, the European Union, India, Japan, China, Russia, South Korea, has been estimated at approximately $14.4 billion (at April 2016 exchange rates.) That's around a third the estimated cost of the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico ($42 billion)." (SOURCE: iter.org/faq#Do_we_really_know_how_much_ITER_will_cost) "Based on the European evaluation, we can estimate the cost of ITER construction for the seven members at approximately EUR 13 billion, if all the manufacturing is done in Europe." )
Or, looking at it another way, the cost of building the National Ignition Facility -- a key research project into nuclear fusion -- was less that 10% of the cost of the BP oil spill.


![Will Earths magnetic reversal cause catastrophe? (Part 2 of Did the CIA classify...?)
Part one of this video is here:
https://youtu.be/0FtYSzS53C0
TO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL PLEASE SUPPORT THIS CHARITY:
I do not ask for contributions. Instead, please support the work of Health in Harmony, which trades forest protections for health care. See my video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9-GRugP9pU for an explanation of their work.
Donations can be made here: https://healthinharmony.org/donate-today/
Health in Harmony also has a live website: https://actnow.healthinharmony.org/
CORRECTIONS:
1) 13:01 – I said ‘kilometers an hour’ instead of ‘miles an hour.’
2) As expected, someone corrected my understanding of the torque required to stop the Earths rotation. The formulaa I used is for a uniform sphere, whereas the Earth has a much denser center and a lighter crust. So the torque would be slightly less than I calculated. But in non-scientific terms, still a shitload.
3) Another poster wrote: The unit of torque is Nm [Newton-meter] not Nm/s.
4) @anttibra, a physics teacher from Finland, corrected my calculation. On the basis that he knows better then me, Im happy to lay it out here. He wrote:
Torque is calculated by this equation: M=F x r, where x is vector product. If force is plumb compared to distance of rotating axis, then you can use simple multiplication.
Angular momentum is L=J*w, where J=moment of inertia (similar to mass in rotation) and w=angular velocity.
Assuming Earth is uniform sphere (its not, but this is simplified math), then J=2/5*Mr^2=9,721052869650016e37 kgm^2
Since Earth rotate once every 23h 56min 4,10 seconds, then angular velocity w=2*pi/(86164,1 s)=7,292*10^-5 1/s.
Now we get Earths angular momentum L=7,08870359707824214497e33 kgm^2/s.
When we want to stop the Earth, we must apply torque over time.
delta L=M*delta t, delta t = time we apply torque. If the Earth stops in 10 hours, then delta t= 36000 seconds.
M=L/t=7,08870359707824214497e33 kgm^2/s / (36000 s) = 1,96908433252173392916e29 Nm.
How much is this? Well, if we apply force on the equator, the required force would be:
M=F*r
F = M/r = 1,96908433252173392916e29 Nm / (6 378 140 m) = 3,08723912068680513309e22 = 31e21 N = 31 ZN = 31 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 N.
Another poster added: You have this line as part of your corrections: Since Earth rotate once every 23h 56min 4,10 seconds, then angular velocity w=2*pi/(86164,1 s)=7,292*10^-5 1/s. The units are in radians per second, but the unit written have been written as rotations per second (Hz or 1/s).
SOURCES:
Earth Catastrophe Cycle | Pole Shift
Suspicious0bservers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgJ4zVNe_vk
An overview of Earth’s magnetic field
https://geomag.bgs.ac.uk/education/earthmag.html#_Toc2075556
Strength of field falling:
https://www.ontariobeneathourfeet.com/magnetic-reversal
Magnetic field over 9,000 years:
https://www.universetoday.com/156234/the-rapid-changes-were-seeing-with-the-earths-magnetic-field-dont-mean-the-poles-are-about-to-flip-this-is-normal/
Equations of inertia;
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/force-required-to-stop-a-rotating-disc.553017/#:~:text=a%20rotating%20disc%3F-,The%20formula%20for%20calculating%20the%20force%20required%20to%20stop%20a,takes%20to%20stop%20the%20disc.
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/613448/energy-required-to-tilt-earth-s-axis-by-90-degrees
https://www.universetoday.com/156234/the-rapid-changes-were-seeing-with-the-earths-magnetic-field-dont-mean-the-poles-are-about-to-flip-this-is-normal/
Recurrent ancient geomagnetic field anomalies shed light onfuture evolution of the South Atlantic Anomaly https://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.2200749119
The Earth’s magnetic field – an overview
https://geomag.bgs.ac.uk/education/earthmag.html
https://www.ontariobeneathourfeet.com/magnetic-reversal
How Does A Magnetic Reversal Affect Life On Earth?
RapidChangesinStrengthandDirectionofEarthsMagneticFieldOverthePast100,000Years
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GC011236 Will Earths magnetic reversal cause catastrophe? (Part 2 of Did the CIA classify...?)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VpmUdUDIjVQ/mqdefault.jpg)







![How to argue for science (and have fun!)
This title replaces the original How to argue with assholes, which many people misinterpreted despite my exhortations right at the beginning.
Here are the questions I showed on the video from 17:54, with my answers.
From: http://creation.com/15-questions
1. HOW DID LIFE ORIGINATE?
See my video The Origin of Life Made Easy.
2. HOW DID THE DNA CODE ORIGINATE?
It probably evolved from RNA.
3. HOW COULD MUTATIONS CREATE THE HUGE VOLUMES OF INFORMATION IN THE DNA OF LIVING THINGS?
They probably couldn’t, as most modern biology textbooks explain.
4. WHY IS NATURAL SELECTION, A PRINCIPLE
RECOGNIZED BY CREATIONISTS TAUGHT AS
‘EVOLUTION’, AS IF IT EXPLAINS THE ORIGIN OF
THE DIVERSITY OF LIFE?
It isn’t, except in creationist schools.
5. HOW DID NEW BIOCHEMICAL PATHWAYS,
WHICH INVOLVE MULTIPLE ENZYMES WORKING
TOGETHER IN SEQUENCE, ORIGINATE?
Through natural selection.
6. LIVING THINGS LOOK LIKE THEY WERE DESIGNED, SO HOW DO EVOLUTIONISTS KNOW THAT THEY WERE NOT DESIGNED?
Because we can see from the fossil evidence that they evolved.
7. HOW DID MULTI-CELLULAR LIFE ORIGINATE?
From single-celled organisms clumping together.
8. HOW DID SEX ORIGINATE?
Probably through the DNA from one organism entering another cell.
9. WHY ARE THE (EXPECTED) COUNTLESS
MILLIONS OF TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS MISSING?
Because not everything fossilizes, and not every sedimentary rock has been cracked open.
(No space for the other questions)
From: http://breakingthepresidium.wordpress.com/2011/02/18/10-questions-evolution-cant-answer/
1. Which came first? Time, Space, Matter or energy?
A: Time (nothing can exist ‘before’ time.)
2.Where did the necessary materials to create the universe come from and where did they exist if there was no space?
A: Matter condensed from energy (since the two are equivalent.) They existed in space (your question was wrong).
3. Where did life originally come from if it can not appear spontaneously?
Chemicals like methane, hydrogen cyanide and water (see answer to Creation Ministries)
4. Which came first? Male or Female?
Both at the same time, I would have thought. If there are no females, how can you tell something is ‘male’, and vice-versa.
5. Why do we find petrified trees standing up through supposedly “millions” of years worth of geological layers?
We don’t. If you think we do, please give an example.
6. What were the first elements to be formed?
Hydrogen and helium (and smaller amounts of lithium and beryllium).
7. When and how did the stars come to be?
Through fusion, about 100 million years after the Big Bang
8. When did the laws of nature(i.e. Gravity) first come into effect?
When our universe began.
9. Why is an unproven theory used as fact?
It isn’t, in science at least. If you think it is, please give an example.
10. How did the universe start(please provide specified details)?
Inflation of space from singularity.
From: http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/06/my_two_favorite_questions_for_global_warmists.html
Question 1: Did you know that there’s no such thing as a greenhouse gas?
A: No. (I’m stupid, remember?)
Question 2: How much actual CO2 is there in the atmosphere?
About 3 trillion tons. That’s about 400 parts per million, which is 0.04% by volume.
From http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3163503/posts
Q: There was once nearly a mile of ice over what is now Manhattan. Was the warming that melted its good thing or a bad thing? What caused it?
Q: The Glaciers covered New York, Chicago and Seattle with a mile and a half of ice as recently as 11,000 years ago and also formed the great lakes. Geologists claim they have come and gone many times previously. What caused them to retreat (and advance) then?
ANSWER TO BOTH QUESTIONS: Ice advance and retreat was triggered by a slight change in the Earth’s orbit, amplified by positive feedback.
Q: What’s causing the documented warming on Mars?
A: Dust storms which exposed darker patches which absorbed more solar energy.
Q: Can you tell me +/- 3 degress F what the optimal correct temperatures should be on the high end and the low end?
There is no “optimal” temperature for the entire Earth because ‘optimal’ means most favorable, i.e. the temperature which yields the best results. No single temperature will achieve the best results for everything from coral to moose to brussel sprouts, even if the Earth was able to achieve a uniform temperature (which it can’t), because each has very different optimal temperatures.
Does the historical data indicate that an increase in temperature followed [or preceded] an increase in atmospheric CO2?
Answer: The historical data shows both. See my video “The 800-year lag explained.” How to argue for science (and have fun!)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YezbREhH_Eg/mqdefault.jpg)