Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
One of the easiest ways to dismiss an argument is to question the motives of the person making it.
Social media comments have accused creation scientists of "lying for money," but accusations like that don't address the evidence. Scientific claims should be evaluated by whether the evidence supports the conclusions, not by speculation about someone's motives.
We look back at a conversation with Dr. Andrew Snelling and the geological evidence that challenges the conventional millions-of-years narrative. If the evidence is flawed, it should be answered with better evidence, not assumptions about the people presenting it.
👉 CreationToday.org/481
One of the easiest ways to dismiss an argument is to question the motives of the person making it.
Social media comments have accused creation scientists of "lying for money," but accusations like that don't address the evidence. Scientific claims should be evaluated by whether the evidence supports the conclusions, not by speculation about someone's motives.
We look back at a conversation with Dr. Andrew Snelling and the geological evidence that challenges the conventional millions-of-years narrative. If the evidence is flawed, it should be answered with better evidence, not assumptions about the people presenting it.
👉 CreationToday.org/481
