Why Troy Might Still be Lost, and how it went missing in the first place @TheFallofRome
Why Troy Might Still be Lost, and how it went missing in the first place @TheFallofRome
Uploaded April 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
The archaeological site of Hisarlik is generally believed to be the site of the a city that Hittite documents call Wilusa, and which Greek sources call Troy. Certainly during the Greco-Roman period it was known as Troy, but today some archaeologists are not so sure. And, for that matter, if Troy was so well known during the Roman period, how did it go missing anyway?

SOURCES:
The Trojans and their Neighbors, Bryce
The Trojan War: A Very Short Introduction, Cline
Digging for Troy: From Homer to Hisarlik, Cline & Rubalcaba
Why Troy Might Still be Lost, and how it went missing in the first placeWhen did the Romans think the Roman Empire fell?Land of the Tigers Mouths: Understanding the Iga-Kōga Phenomenon & the Birth of the NinjaThe Worst Archaeological Disaster in History...Like EverHow History Lost An Entire Army, And How We Maybe Found It AgainAn introduction to Roman MagicWere women present in the Roman military? A reply to Brandon FGo Fast Imperialism: The Manchurian Incident & Interwar Japanese Colonial PoliticsHow Sumer Became a Lost Civilization & Cuneiform Became a Lost ScriptVesuvius was so much worse than we thoughtMercenary Samurai & the Rise of the Kamakura ShogunateJapan to 1868 pt 15, Conclusions
The Historians Craft |

Why Troy Might Still be Lost, and how it went missing in the first place

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER