Uploaded April 2022 | Updated September 2026, 4 hours ago

---

In this video, I discuss the latest New England Journal of Medicine study on time-restricted feeding and some exceptionally bad takes on it. In particular, I detail how Andrew Huberman appears not to have read the study and mischaracterizes it on Twitter. Then, I talk about how Satchin Panda and Rhonda Patrick each mis-state important facts about and misinterpret the study’s significance. I use these examples as a sounding board to explain what we can in fact take away from the study—and indeed, from the research on time-restricted feeding to date.

UPDATE: I published a follow-up video here: youtube.com/watch?v=rW0P2FFRcbs

===

Like, comment, subscribe.

For more, find me at:
PODCAST The Kevin Bass Show
YOUTUBE youtube.com/user/kbassphiladelphia
WEBSITE thedietwars.com
TWITTER twitter.com/kevinnbass
twitter.com/healthmisinfo
INSTAGRAM instagram.com/kevinnbass
TIKTOK tiktok.com/@kevinnbass

And above all, please donate to support what I do:
PATREON patreon.com/kevinnbass
DONATE thedietwars.com/support-me