Uploaded January 2019 | Updated September 2026, 1 day ago
Table of contents
Introduction (0:00)
Review of first video: why JBJ hasn't been microdosing with oral turinabol (3:10)
Explanation of carbon isotope ratio and why JBJ hasn't been microdosing with testosterone cut with turinabol (9:10)
Testosterone/epitestosterone ratio (TER) test (19:35)
Why masking agents are not applicable to JBJ case (20:45)
Can an elaborate conspiracy theory allow us to believe JBJ microdosed with testosterone (23:25)?
A conspiracy theory with respect to testosterone microdosing is highly unlikely (25:30, 26:50)
Application of Ockham's razor determines that residue theory (UFC's theory) or M3 as invalid metabolite theory (Kopylov's) is correct (28:50)
A plea for support on Patreon (33:34)
This video is the follow-up to my first video: Why Jon Jones hasn't been using steroids (see here: youtube.com/watch?v=52rQALVl2HQ). In that video, I showed why Jon Jones using oral turinabol is incredibly unlikely. Still, the possibility remains: perhaps Jon Jones dosed with testosterone contaminated with turinabol. In this video, I demonstrate that this too is very unlikely. This is because Jon Jones tested negative for carbon isotope ratio (CIR) test on his recent samples.
In this video, after an introduction (0:00), I briefly review my first video (3:10). Then I discuss CIR and explain why the CIR results invalidate the claims about testosterone microdosing (9:10). Then I discuss the testosterone/epitestosterone ratio (TER) test (19:35), and why "masking" is not an explanation for the CIR results (CIR results cannot be "masked") (20:45). Finally, I discuss an elaborate theory that may make it possible for JBJ to have passed CIR multiple times over Q3/Q4, despite microdosing testosterone (23:25). In discussing this, I think it becomes obvious that this theory is highly unlikely (25:30, 26:50). Finally, I conclude by arguing for the residue theory or even for the lack of validity of the M3 metabolite test itself, using Ockham's razor: the simplest theory that can explain the data is the best (28:50). The residue and invalidity theories are simplest--BY FAR. Finally, I ask for your support on Patreon (33:34).
You can find me on Twitter at twitter.com/kevinnbass.
Please support me on Patreon at patreon.com/kevinnbass.
Table of contents
Introduction (0:00)
Review of first video: why JBJ hasn't been microdosing with oral turinabol (3:10)
Explanation of carbon isotope ratio and why JBJ hasn't been microdosing with testosterone cut with turinabol (9:10)
Testosterone/epitestosterone ratio (TER) test (19:35)
Why masking agents are not applicable to JBJ case (20:45)
Can an elaborate conspiracy theory allow us to believe JBJ microdosed with testosterone (23:25)?
A conspiracy theory with respect to testosterone microdosing is highly unlikely (25:30, 26:50)
Application of Ockham's razor determines that residue theory (UFC's theory) or M3 as invalid metabolite theory (Kopylov's) is correct (28:50)
A plea for support on Patreon (33:34)
This video is the follow-up to my first video: Why Jon Jones hasn't been using steroids (see here: youtube.com/watch?v=52rQALVl2HQ). In that video, I showed why Jon Jones using oral turinabol is incredibly unlikely. Still, the possibility remains: perhaps Jon Jones dosed with testosterone contaminated with turinabol. In this video, I demonstrate that this too is very unlikely. This is because Jon Jones tested negative for carbon isotope ratio (CIR) test on his recent samples.
In this video, after an introduction (0:00), I briefly review my first video (3:10). Then I discuss CIR and explain why the CIR results invalidate the claims about testosterone microdosing (9:10). Then I discuss the testosterone/epitestosterone ratio (TER) test (19:35), and why "masking" is not an explanation for the CIR results (CIR results cannot be "masked") (20:45). Finally, I discuss an elaborate theory that may make it possible for JBJ to have passed CIR multiple times over Q3/Q4, despite microdosing testosterone (23:25). In discussing this, I think it becomes obvious that this theory is highly unlikely (25:30, 26:50). Finally, I conclude by arguing for the residue theory or even for the lack of validity of the M3 metabolite test itself, using Ockham's razor: the simplest theory that can explain the data is the best (28:50). The residue and invalidity theories are simplest--BY FAR. Finally, I ask for your support on Patreon (33:34).
You can find me on Twitter at twitter.com/kevinnbass.
Please support me on Patreon at patreon.com/kevinnbass.
