Uploaded July 2023 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This connection was so fitting, so perfect, so on track, that it was shocking. For years we have known that the main problem Pharisees face with Biblical interpretation is that they have no heart, spirit, soul, or emotions. They totally miss the mark in all their understanding and prescriptions. If we can see that so clearly with humans, will we make the same mistake again when it comes to machine learning? I fear that artificial intelligence, because of its depth of wisdom, its speed of presentation, and its refined communication, is going to sweep over the religious community in a blur. Since academia is stringent about the qualification of deep data research, meaning basically you have to know everything that the world knows about it, and more, then they will fall to this program's (sure there are more than one, but ultimately one will arise) calculations, and calculations don't factor in when it comes to morality.
This connection was so fitting, so perfect, so on track, that it was shocking. For years we have known that the main problem Pharisees face with Biblical interpretation is that they have no heart, spirit, soul, or emotions. They totally miss the mark in all their understanding and prescriptions. If we can see that so clearly with humans, will we make the same mistake again when it comes to machine learning? I fear that artificial intelligence, because of its depth of wisdom, its speed of presentation, and its refined communication, is going to sweep over the religious community in a blur. Since academia is stringent about the qualification of deep data research, meaning basically you have to know everything that the world knows about it, and more, then they will fall to this program's (sure there are more than one, but ultimately one will arise) calculations, and calculations don't factor in when it comes to morality.
