Uploaded April 2024 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
One challenge that is offered all the time to apologists is, "If God knows the one miracle it would take to convince me that He is real, why doesn't He do it? This means He either isn't real, or doesn't care." The first thing one has to consider is, does a morally relative ascriber have to tell the truth about their position? Second, does this not in fact overlook the fact that we all have free will and anyone can deny any evidence placed at their feet? There also seems to another feature at work here that we shall dive into briefly.
One challenge that is offered all the time to apologists is, "If God knows the one miracle it would take to convince me that He is real, why doesn't He do it? This means He either isn't real, or doesn't care." The first thing one has to consider is, does a morally relative ascriber have to tell the truth about their position? Second, does this not in fact overlook the fact that we all have free will and anyone can deny any evidence placed at their feet? There also seems to another feature at work here that we shall dive into briefly.
